When the U.S.-based researchers Christian Davenport and Allan Stam had concluded their last assessment of mortality rates in Rwanda during the period of extreme violence from April through July, 1994, Davenport, who is a professor of Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame, released a statement which raised questions that the advocates for the standard account of the “Rwandan genocide” never confront, let alone answer (see Joan Fallon, “Penyelidikan memberi penerangan baharu tentang pembunuhan Rwanda, " Berita Notre Dame, 24 Mac 2009):
Banyak usaha telah dilanjutkan untuk memastikan tumpuan kekal secara eksklusif kepada mangsa Francophone Tutsi dan algojo Hutu mereka. Tetapi daripada anggaran satu juta orang yang terbunuh, antara 300,000 dan 500,000 daripada mereka adalah Tutsi, menurut anggaran terbaik. Bagaimana pula dengan 500,000 hingga 700,000 orang yang lain? Siapa yang bertanggungjawab atas kematian mereka?
Adalah sangat mendedahkan bahawa penyokong akaun standard pernah attempt to analyze or dispute facts such as these. Instead, they settle for making the accusation that anyone who raises this kind of question is a “genocide minimizer” or “genocide denier”—that is, is someone who recognizes the reality of the military invasion and subsequent conquest of state-power inside Rwanda by the Rwandan Patriotic Front from October 1990 through July 1994, causing an enormous loss of human life in the process.
According to Rwanda’s 1991 census, the total Tutsi population in the country stood at slightly less than 600,000 persons. Seperti yang ditulis oleh Davenport dan Stam "Apa yang Sebenarnya Berlaku di Rwanda?"(Miller-McCune, 6 Oktober 2009), the Tutsi organization IBUKA claimed that “about 300,000 Tutsi survived the 1994 slaughter”—a number which means that “out of the 800,000 to 1 million believed to have been killed then, more than half were Hutu.”
These assertions are incompatible with the standard account of the “Rwandan genocide.” It is for this reason that I’m reproducing here a very important table that I adapted from the 1991 census of Rwanda’s national population. If there’s any accuracy in this census, there is something profoundly wrong with the version of the “Rwandan genocide” that has been handed down to us as if some kind of Ten Commandments from God.
Table. Rwanda’s national population as of 1991,
dipecahkan oleh dua kumpulan etnik terbesarnya [A]
Prefektur |
Hutu |
Tutsi |
Jumlah [B] |
Butare |
618,172 (82.0%) |
130,419 (17.3%) |
753,868 |
Byumba |
761,966 (98.2%) |
11,639 (1.5%) |
775,933 |
Cyangugu |
489,238 (88.7%) |
57,914 (10.5%) |
551,565 |
Gikongoro |
401,997 (86.3%) |
59,624 (12.8%) |
465,814 |
Gisenyi |
708,572 (96.8%) |
21,228 (2.9%) |
731,996 |
Gitarama |
764,920 (90.2%) |
78,018 (9.2%) |
848,027 |
Kibungo |
596,999 (92.0%) |
49,966 (7.7%) |
648,912 |
Kibuye |
398,131 (84.8%) |
69,485 (14.8%) |
469,494 |
Kigali |
822,314 (90.8%) |
79,696 (8.8%) |
905,632 |
Kigali City [C] |
180,550 (81.4%) |
39,703 (17.9%) |
221,806 |
Ruhengeri |
760,661 (99.2%) |
3,834 (0.5%) |
766,795 |
JUMLAH |
6,467,958 (91.1%) |
596,387 (8.4%) |
7,099,844 |
Bandar |
313,586 (83.9%) |
57,186 (15.3%) |
373,762 |
Luar Bandar |
6,154,365 (91.5%) |
558,265 (8.3%) |
6,726,082 |
[A] Adapted from Table 4.2, “Répartition (en %) de la population de nationalité rwandaise selon l’ethnie, la préfecture ou le milieu de résidence, "Dalam Recensement general de la population et de l’habitat au 15 aout 1991, Service National de Recensement, Republique Rwandaise, p. 124. Table 4.2 reported the national population of Rwanda, ca. 1991, mengikut etnik dan dinyatakan sebagai peratusan (iaitu, di sini peratusan di dalam kurungan). Based on Rwanda’s total population (7,099,844) at the time, I’ve simply calculated the related approximate totals in the second and third columns for Hutu and Tutsi (e.g., 7,099,844 x 8.4% = 596,387 for the total Tutsi population of Rwanda at the time of the 1991 census). Ambil perhatian bahawa nombor ini harus dianggap sebagai jumlah anggaran.
[B] Note that although I’ve omitted separate columns for the Twa and Other (relatively small) ethnic groups that were listed in Table 4.2 (1991), the Totals column here includes the totals for Twa and Other.
[C] Note that Kigali City’s total is separate from the total for Kigali Prefecture.
ZNetwork dibiayai semata-mata melalui kemurahan hati pembacanya.
Donate