What about creating an organization of pareconists, so to speak? I don’t know whether this would be positive if it were it to grow to considerable size, nor even whether it would grow at all, for that matter. So this is an idea that pounds away in my mind…not escaping those borders into actual practice.
No vienas puses, un šī vienmēr ir vieglākā daļa, iedomājieties, ka mums ir līdzdalības ekonomikas organizācija, ko sauc par ope vai tamlīdzīgi. Pieņemsim, ka tai ir desmit tūkstoši vai pat simts tūkstoši vai miljons dalībnieku visā pasaulē ar nodaļām desmitiem valstu. Pieņemsim, ka tā bija iekšēji pašpārvalde. Pieņemsim, ka tā aizstāvēja, pētīja, apsprieda un mēģināja elastīgi, lokāli ieviest parekonisku struktūru, kā arī mēģina uzvarēt nereformistiskas reformas trajektorijā, kas ved uz parekonu. Vai tā būtu laba lieta?
Manuprāt, protams, ja parecon ir laba lieta, tad šāda organizācija būtu brīnišķīga.
But, you say, if we did this now it wouldn’t be this big and so powerful and so structurally consistent with pareconish values at the outset. Well of course it wouldn’t – that takes time. But nor could it ever get to that desired stature unless it got started at some initial time and place and scale, however initially small and inferior to ultimate hopes. So there is an argument for doing it.
On the other hand, who is going to define such an organization at its outset? What confidence can we have it would remain or become self-managing as its membership grew? What confidence can we have, for that matter, that it would grow rather than petering out at the expense of our efforts? What confidence can we have that such an organization would be open and exploratory and constantly innovative, as compared to being stodgy and sectarian. How can we be confident that it would implement changes flexibly as compared to being an adventurist nuisance or just plain incompetent? Should these and other concerns cause us only to function with great care, or should they cause us to entirely reject such an attempt?
ZNetwork tiek finansēts tikai ar lasītāju dāsnumu.
Ziedot