Occasionally when I’m speaking to college students, attempting to inspire
at least a few to commit themselves to social justice as a way of life and
perhaps career, I’m asked the question for which there is no easy answer; the
one that goes: "What’s the point? Can you make a difference? Why fight
against such incredible odds?" As disturbing as such fatalism is,
particularly from persons so young, I appreciate the opportunity to confront
it. It’s one of those rare times during a lecture when the speaker has to drop
all pretense, put aside academic theories, and actually connect with that one
other human being, even if only for a moment. And it is in that brief span of
time when one can actually move another to a different place-without
statistics or applause lines-by standing in a figurative sense naked before
those one hopes to inspire.
And it’s a good question, after all. There is much to suggest that justice,
peace and equity are pipe dreams; that even our best efforts aren’t enough to
prevent tragedy. The bombing of Yugoslavia; the embargo against the people of
Iraq; the passage of welfare "reform"; the expansion of the
prison-industrial-complex as education budgets are slashed. "Don’t these
ominous trends,’ they ask, ‘ever make you want to throw up your hands and
quit?"
There was a time when I might have said yes to that question, but not
anymore. Like everyone, I confront fatigue and need rest. But that’s not the
same as wanting to quit. And what made the difference was a letter I received
many years ago from Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa; a letter he sent
in 1988 to the anti-apartheid group I co-founded at Tulane University; a
letter in which he thanked us for sending information on Tulane’s investments
in apartheid-complicit firms-information which convinced him to reject the
school’s offer of an honorary doctorate.
As if knowing that those of us involved in the divestment battle were
doubting our relevance-after all, even if we succeeded would things really
change in South Africa? -he offered what I consider an obvious, yet profound
rationale for the work of any freedom fighter: "You do not do the things
you do because others will necessarily join you in the doing of them, nor
because they will ultimately prove successful. You do the things you do
because the things you do are right."
There’s much to be said for such simplicity, as it’s usually a lack of
complication which allows people to feel. Religion, after all, isn’t terribly
complex, but has inspired, for good and evil, millions around the world.
Sometimes I think we both oversell and undersell the notion of fighting for
social justice. Oversell in that we focus so much on "winning" the
battle in which we’re engaged, that we often create false hope, and if victory
proves limited or fleeting, those in whom we nurtured the hope feel spent,
unable to rise again to the challenge. And yet we undersell the work too, in
that we often neglect to point out that there is redemption in struggle
itself, and that "victory," although sought, is not the only point,
and is never finally won anyway. Even when you succeed in obtaining a measure
of justice, you must mobilize to defend that which you’ve won. There is no
looming vacation. But there is redemption in struggle.
There is something to be said for confronting the choice one must make in
this life-between collaborating with or resisting injustice-and choosing the
latter. There is something to be said for knowing you did all you could to
stop a war, eliminate racism, or improve your community. There is something to
be said for a good night’s sleep, and the ability to wake in the morning, look
oneself in the mirror, and never doubt that if you died before lunch, you
would have lived a life of integrity.
Now some may think such an answer would be of little import to college
students, obsessed as they supposedly are with consumerism and six-figure
jobs. But quite the opposite is true. Sure, some roll their eyes at such talk;
but these are folks who didn’t care about social justice careers to begin
with; those for whom attendance at my speech was simply a classroom
assignment. But for others, including those who posed the challenge, the
answer is meaningful. These are folks desperate for lives of principle and
substance; desperate for someone to assure them they can do it, and that it’s
worth it, win or lose. These are people in need of assurance that someone is
there for them, to nurture their interest and allow their contribution. But
unless we reach them before the "real world" begins to feel more
like a burden than a challenge, and before they develop an interest,
proprietary or otherwise in maintaining the status quo, they will likely
drift, moved to action rarely if ever, having had to compromise so much so
soon. And it’s important to remind them that every now and then you really do
make a difference; you really do improve people’s lives; you really do force
better working conditions; you really do stop people from being bombed, and
tortured. And you never know when that will happen; when your efforts will
break loose the dam and send forth waters of triumph. But you do know one
thing. You know for certain-as certain as the sun rising and setting-what will
happen if you don’t do the work; if we don’t. Nothing. And given that choice,
between certainty and promise, in which territory lies the measure of our
resolve and humanity, I will gladly opt for hope.
If a monster like Adolph Hitler can rise from a movement which started with
roughly seven guys, sitting in a pub, then surely those who fight for his
antithesis can make do with the raw material to be found in Generations X and
Y. Surely we can inspire as well as he.
And all of us can play that role. A few years ago, I was approached by a
student at San Francisco State who said he had seen me on television, and that
in the five minutes I’d been given to explain why whites should challenge
racism, I had changed his life. At first I thought he had the wrong guy. It
never occurred to me that a few words between commercials could have such
impact. But the look in his eyes indicated he was sincere, and it’s a look
I’ve seen elsewhere since. And who knows whom those inspired by me, may
themselves inspire in the future? What great things might they do? All I know
is, it’s worth my entire being to be part of it. Recently, I spoke at the
University of Oregon, and gave a workshop in the Ben Linder room of the
student center; a room named for a man who, in April, 1987, in Nicaragua, was
murdered by contra forces, armed by my government, and his; killed for helping
bring running water to rural villagers.
And as I sat there reflecting on how I’d felt upon hearing of his
assassination, I remembered why he, and the revolution of which he was a part
had to be crushed. They both posed, as we used to say, the threat of a good
example. And that’s when I realized that Ben Linder’s life and death sum up
why I do what I do, and what’s required of us. I can think of nothing more
rewarding, after all, than to serve as the threat of a good example; and no
higher calling than to be prepared to die for your principles if need be, but
even more, to be unafraid to live for them.
Tim Wise is a Nashville-based writer and lecturer, and the Director of the
newly-formed Association for White Anti-Racist Education (AWARE). He can be
reached at [email protected].