U-Mohsen Abdelmoumen: Ukuchaza kanjani ukuhanjiswa kohulumeni baseNtshonalanga kanye nabezindaba zabo kwa-Israyeli?
UJean Bricmont: Ngokucindezelwa kwama-lobbies, ukuphikelela okuqhubekayo ekukhunjweni kokuqothulwa kwesizwe, njll. Lokhu kudala isimo lapho ongqondongqondo beZionist bengasoze bagxekwa ngaphandle kwengozi yokuphathwa njengefascist noma amaNazi. Konke lokhu kuphumelela kakhulu futhi abantu bathule ngoba beswele isibindi.
Kungani, ngokubona kwakho, bonke labo abalahla inqubomgomo yobugebengu yakwa-Israyeli bebizwa ngokuthi abamelene namaSemite?
Akubona bonke abagxeka izinqubomgomo zakwa-Israel abathathwa njengabamelene namaSemite, masingafaki ihaba. Kodwa ukugxeka kufanele ngaso sonke isikhathi kwenziwe ngaphakathi kohlaka olulinganiselwe. Singagxeka egameni lamalungelo abantu, kodwa asikwazi ukukhuluma ngelungelo lasePalestine lokubuya noma izinto ezingathinta ukuba semthethweni kuka-Israyeli noma lokho okubizwa ngokuthi ilungelo lika-Israyeli lokuba khona. Nokho ilungelo lokuba khona liwumqondo ongenalutho weMibuso; isibonelo, angicabangi ukuthi umuntu angasho ukuthi iBelgium inelungelo lokuba khona, ingase inyamalale kusasa ngenxa yokuhlukana kwezwe. Izwe lingakhetha ukubumbana noma ukwehlukana, umbuso ungashintsha, kodwa uma kuziwa kwa-Israel, awunalo ilungelo lokudlulela phambili ekugxekeni kwakho, akukho sicelo sokuduba isibonelo.. Uzotshelwa ukuthi ubeka u-Israyeli oyedwa ekugxekeni kwakho, ukuthi ugxeka u-Israyeli ngaphezu kwezinye izifundazwe, ngakho-ke i-anti-Semitic.
Muva nje, umholi wakwa-Israel uvumile ukuthi i-Israel ihlomile futhi isekela amaqembu amaphekula eSyria, futhi akukho ukuphawula noma ukuphathwa kwalolu lwazi olubucayi oluye lwabonwa. Kungani ucabanga ngakho? Futhi kungani, ngokubona kwakho, izwe lamaZayoni elikhohlakele lakwa-Israyeli lijabulela ukungajeziswa okuphelele?
Mayelana neSyria, izinhlangano eziningi zeZionist ezingakwesokunxele noma ze-crypto-Zionist ziye zazihlanganisa nezinye izinhlangano ezingakwesokunxele ukuze zisekele ukuketulwa kuka-Assad, futhi azithandi ukwaziwa ukuthi u-Israel naye usekela amavukelambuso noma amaphekula afuna ukuketula u-Assad. Ngokwengqondo, abantu abathandi ukubonakala besohlangothini luka-Israyeli. U-Israyeli akadumile. Sisesimweni lapho izinto zishintsha futhi, empeleni, I-Israel ayisadumile nhlobo, ngokungafani neminyaka ye-1950-60. Inkulumo yokugxeka u-Israyeli isalinganiselwe kakhulu, kodwa ngasese, abantu abanqikazi ukuyigxeka. Ngaphambili, u-Israyeli wayebhekwa njengesikhundla esithuthukisiwe saseNtshonalanga, akunjalo namuhla. Wonke “amaDemocrats and Progressives” abize ukuketulwa kuka-Assad, ngokusobala ngenxa yamalungelo abantu, awathandi nakancane ukuthi kuboniswe ukuthi, empeleni, ukuketula u-Assad kwakugxile kakhulu ku-ajenda yakwa-Israyeli.
Siyini isisindo sangempela sendawo yokwamukela izivakashi yakwa-Israyeli eYurophu?
Ayinamandla kunase-United States, kodwa futhi iyahlukahluka kuye ngamazwe. Isibonelo, iNorway noma i-Ireland amazwe lapho indawo yokwamukela izivakashi ingathwali isisindo ngakho-ke yenza okungaphezulu noma okuncane abakufunayo, kodwa abancane. Indawo yokwamukela izivakashi inamandla kakhulu eFrance naseGreat Britain. Bheka nje ukuhlaselwa kukaCorbyn eNgilandi kuyilapho uCorbyn engakaze asho noma enze okuthile okuphambene namaSemite. Iqembu lakhe lahlanjalazwa; kwenziwa ucwaningo kuthungathwa noma yimuphi umusho ongasetshenziselwa ukumdiliza. Lokhu kwenziwa no-Ken Loach, no-Ken Livingstone, owayengumeya waseLondon. Umusho omncane ongacacile uphakanyiswa njengobufakazi bokubhubhisa laba bantu, abangahambisani namaJuda nakancane. E-France, unabantu abafana noBernard-Henri Levy okwathi kusukela ekuqaleni bathi ama-Yellow Vests aphikisana namaSemite naphezu kokuthi akukho anti-Semitism yangempela kule nhlangano.
Ingabe abezindaba eNtshonalanga ababi amathuluzi e-propaganda okusungulwa?
Ngeke ngisebenzise igama elithi "propaganda" ngoba ngithanda ukubhekisela encwadini kaHerman noChomsky "Imvume yokukhiqiza". Ayikho inkulumo-ze ngomqondo weSoviet waleli gama, akuyona i-naïve propaganda, izintatheli zibonakala zikhululekile futhi empeleni zikhululekile, kodwa labo abasebenzela abezindaba abavamile bamukela ngokusobala izithiyo ezithile zengqondo ngaphandle kokucabanga ngakho. Ngokusobala, uma sebezamukele lezi zingqinamba futhi bacabanga ngaphakathi kwalezi zingqinamba, bakhululekile.
Kungani, ngokubona kwakho, inhlangano ye-Yellow Vest iphazamisa ukusungulwa?
Ziyaphazamisa ngoba azikho izimangalo ezithile ezinganeliseka kakhulu noma kancane ngakho-ke kukhona uhlobo lwenselelo yomhlaba wonke ohlelweni oluhamba kuzo zonke izinkomba. Kungaba izintela ezimbalwa, ezinye izintela, izintela ezifanele; kuyinselelo yomhlaba wonke kangangoba uhlelo alwazi ukuthi luyisingatha kanjani. Uma kunemibhikisho yezinyunyana, kusuke kuvunyelwane ngokuthile bese kuthi izinyunyana zigculiseke ngakho. Isimo esihle esilawulekayo, kodwa lapha amandla akazi ukuthi kufanele enzeni ukuze anelise ama-Yellow Vest. Noma ngabe uMacron angahamba, izinto bezingeke zishintshe kakhulu.
Ngokusho kwakho, ukuvela kwama-Yellow Vests akuwona umlando? Ingabe le nhlangano ayibalulekile kakhulu esifisweni sayo sokubuyisela amandla kubantu?
Yebo, ngicabanga kanjalo, kodwa kuyinkimbinkimbi kakhulu ukucabanga indlela abantu ababezothatha ngayo amandla. Bakhuluma nge-RIC (Citizens' Initiative Referendum) kanye ne-European Union, kodwa abacacisi nhlobo kulolu daba lwakamuva. Inkinga ukuthi kuwumnyakazo ozenzakalelayo futhi ongahlelekile, ngakho abekho abaholi, ayikho indlela yokucabanga ngokuhlanganyela. Kunomqondo ohlangene othuthukiswa ngabantu abaxoxa emigwaqweni becabanga ezinye izindlela, kodwa umnyakazo awukahleleki ngokwanele ukuze sazi ukuthi uzosiholelaphi. Ngithanda ukucabanga ukuthi kufanele silinde ukwazi ukuthi kuzovelani ngakho konke lokhu. Okwamanje, bayamelana, osekuphawulekayo kakade, kodwa lapho kuzoya khona, angazi. Akufanele, ngokwesibonelo, benze uhlu lokhetho lwase-Europe; Ngicabanga ukuthi kuyiphutha. Ama-Yellow Vest amaningi ayavuma ukuthi kuyiphutha, kodwa kusenemizamo ehlukahlukene. Kunemizamo enzima kakhulu yokucindezela abantu abanobugqila futhi ngesikhathi esifanayo izama ukuphulukisa abantu abangenangqondo ezimisele ukungena engxoxweni noMacron futhi badlale umdlalo wokhetho.
Ingabe ukunyakaza kwama-Yellow Vests akunayo imfanelo yokusibonisa ukwethuka kwe-oligarchy eqondisa i-France nomhlaba?
(Ehleka). Angilithandi ngempela igama elithi “oligarchy”, ngakho ngizothi isigaba esibusayo. Akubona onxiwankulu kuphela, kukhona bonke onxiwankulu abancane, kukhona abezindaba, njalo njalo. Futhi ngeke ngikubize nge-oligarchy. Siyabona ukuthi kuzo zonke lezi zimo kukhona uhlobo lokwethuka. E-France, abaculi, izihlakaniphi, zithule kakhulu. Kukhona ukugqugquzelwa okuncane okuvuna ama-Yellow Vests, kodwa abazi ngempela ukuthi benzeni. Njengoba ukunyakaza kunothando kakhulu lwezwe - bacula i-"Marseillaise", bevezela ifulege lesiFulentshi, njll. Kuyisimo sengqondo esiphazamisa ngokujulile kwesokunxele. Abantu bakhombisa ukuthi banamathele ezweni labo - njengoba ama-Algerians enamathele e-Algeria, amaFulentshi anamathele eFrance - okungasho ukuthi kukhona ubutha kubantu bakwamanye amazwe, kodwa kusho umqondo othile womphakathi wezwe futhi lokhu kuyinto abanxele sebekuzonde amashumi eminyaka. Kuyinkinga enkulu yesokunxele ukuthi inqanyulwe iningi labantu ngoba iwuchitha lo mbono womphakathi wesizwe futhi ibeka phambili ubulungu bayo eYurophu, ukuhwebelana kwembulunga yonke, njll. Kusukela kulo mbono, kwesokunxele sinqunywe ngokuphelele. ngaphandle kwabantu.
Ukuchaza kanjani lokhu kuqubuka kodlame lwamaphoyisa, njengoba sibonile ikakhulukazi kuJerome Rodriguez owaphuphuthekiswa iso elilodwa ngenhlamvu yenjoloba?
Ngokubona kwami abazi ukuthi yini enye okumele bayenze. Angicabangi ukuthi udlame lwamaphoyisa luyimpendulo kuphela odlameni lwama-Yellow Vests ngoba izibhelu, ama-Black Blocks, njll. Kuyathakazelisa ngoba uma befuna ukubabopha, bebezobabopha, kodwa abababophi. Banodlame kodwa abahlanganise lutho namaVest Aphuzi futhi beza ngayo yonke imibhikisho ukuze balethe isiphithiphithi. Kubukeka sengathi bangangenwa, baboshwe, kodwa lutho. Sengivele ngibambe iqhaza emibukisweni ye-Yellow Vests; amaphoyisa anodlame kakhulu ngamaVest Aphuzi, futhi kuwukuzithandela. Ukudutshulwa kwenhlamvu yenjoloba, amabhomu e-teargas, kungokuzithandela. Amaphoyisa awahlali ezimweni eziyingozi ngaso sonke isikhathi. Ngokuvamile bachukuluza ababhikishi. Kungokuzithandela futhi ngicabanga ukuthi imiyalo ivela phezulu, evela kuNgqongqoshe uCastaner noma kumphathi wesifunda, angazi. Kunamaqhinga amaningi okuhlambalaza ama-Yellow Vests kwabezindaba ukuze siwacindezele kakhulu ngokuthi kunodlame ngaphandle kokucacisa ukuthi udlame luvelaphi, nokuzama ukuwahlukanisa ngohlu lokhetho lwase-Europe kanye nezingxoxo neMacron, njll. , wonke amaqhinga asetshenziswa amandla ukudelela le nhlangano ethandwayo.
Ngabe ucabanga ukuthi umbuso wakwaMacron awukwazi ukunikeza impendulo yezepolitiki enkingeni yamaYellow Vests futhi unomnikelo owodwa kuphela owudlame?
Yebo. Iyiphi impendulo yezombangazwe eyayingayinikeza? Ngandlela thize, ama-Yellow Vest abuza imibuzo eyisisekelo kangangokuthi akekho uhulumeni waseYurophu ongayiphendula. Ngaphezu kwalokho, uMacron uyisiboshwa se-European Union logic. Uphonsa amafutha emlilweni ngokucasula kwakhe, kodwa inkinga iwumphumela wamashumi eminyaka ezombusazwe ze-neoliberal, i-deindustrialization, ukucekelwa phansi kwezinsizakalo zomphakathi, njalonjalo. Ngakho-ke, sisesimweni esiyinhlekelele okungewona umthwalo wakhe kuphela, kodwa obuyela eminyakeni yaseMitterrand.
Ulichaza kanjani iqiniso lokuthi ohulumeni baseYurophu, ngenkathi bethi baphikisana nelungelo elidlulele, basekela i-fascist Jaïr Bolsonaro, kanye nelungelo elidlulele eVenezuela nase-Ukraine? Ngabe ohulumeni baseNtshonalanga abadale iGladio kanye “nesala ngemuva” bathi abahlangene nelungelo elikude?
Yebo, basekela ilungelo elikude e-Ukraine ngakolunye uhlangothi futhi bagxeka u-Dieudonné ngokuthi uqinisile. Kuyabheda impela kodwa sekuhlale kunjalo. Ngesikhathi seMpi Yomshoshaphansi, bathi kwakudingekile ukulwa nobushiqela kuyilapho besekela umbuso wobushiqela eGreece, eChile, njll futhi kuqhunyiswa amabhomu iVietnam. Bebelokhu benawo lo mgomo. Bangakwazi ukweseka izinto ezingaphandle abathi balwela ngaphakathi. Kodwa abalwi nabo ngempela ngaphakathi. Ukunyakaza kwama-Yellow Vests akukude kwesokudla futhi ngisho no-Marine Le Pen akayena umshicileli ngomqondo womlando waleli gama, kodwa bamsebenzisa njengesabisa. Phakathi neMpi Yomshoshaphansi, basebenzisa ingxenye ekude kwesokunxele njengesabisa. Bahlale bedinga i-scarecrow. Futhi ngokumangalisayo, bafaka iRussia esikhwameni esifanayo nesokudla, ngakho-ke bangakwazi ukwenza isiyaluyalu esiphikisana nesiRashiya. Wonke amandla adinga isitha, ngakho-ke kuyadingeka ukuthi ube nesabisa esithembeke kakhulu kubantu.
Ingabe abakude kwesokudla akusona yini isiphukuphuku esiwusizo sohlelo lwe-European capitalist njengamaphekula namajihadist abayiziphukuphuku eziwusizo ze-imperialism?
Yebo, umuntu angakwenza lokhu kuqhathanisa. Ngaphandle kokuthi kunamalungelo ahlukene akude. Ngaphambili, kwakukhona ilungelo elikude, ngokwezinga elithile, lokushisekela izwe kanye ne-anti-Zionist. Kwakukhona ukuthambekela okukude kwesokudla okwakungabalandeli basePalestine. Namuhla, konke lokhu sekunyamalele. Bonke banquma ukuthi lapho bebhekene nengcindezi evela kuma-pro-Israel lobbies, ukuphela kwendlela yokuphuma kwakuwukuba umsekeli ka-Israyeli kakhulu kunabanye, ukufuna ukubeka inxusa eJerusalema njengoTrump, Bolsonaro, njll. Bese uthi “ uma singamaZayoni, mhlawumbe azosishiya ngokuthula ekufudukeni njalonjalo”, ngoba ngokujwayelekile amaZion bekuyimingcele evulekile.
Uchaza kanjani ukuthi amaqembu akude kwesokudla amelene neYurophu ngenkathi elokhu ebambe iqhaza okhethweni lwaseYurophu?
Ukubamba iqhaza okhethweni lwaseYurophu akuphikisani nokuphikisana nokwakhiwa kwaseYurophu. Umuntu angabamba iqhaza njengoba uNigel Farage enzile ukugxeka ukwakhiwa kwaseYurophu ePhalamende laseYurophu.
Akukho yini ukungahambisani?
Cha, akuhambisani. Kunamaqembu amaningi amakhomanisi abambe iqhaza okhethweni ngesikhathi egxeka amaphalamende onxiwankulu. Ngeke ngisho ukuthi akuhambisani. Inkinga yelungelo elikude akukhona ukuthi ligxeka i-European Union kodwa alihambisani nokushiya i-European Union. Kuya ngokuthi yiliphi ilungelo elidlulele, kodwa kunoma yikuphi, i-Marine Le Pen, e-France, akuyona eyokushiya i-EU, ngicabanga ukuthi naseMpumalanga Yurophu, bagxeka i-European Union, kodwa bafuna ukuqhubeka nokuthola imali evela eYurophu. Inyunyana; e-Italy, bamukele izimo ze-European Union. Ngakho-ke ngokuvamile kuyaluza. Ngokuvamile ilungelo elidlulele liyi-demagogic ekwenzeni umsindo esihlokweni esisodwa noma kwenye, njengokufika kwamanye amazwe njengesibonelo, ukuze bathathe amandla, kodwa uma befika emandleni, ngeke benze okuningi, ngaphandle kokunciphisa abokufika kanye namaSulumane.
Ngokusho kwakho, ingabe siphila ngaphansi kwentando yeningi eNtshonalanga noma kunalokho i-plutocracy? Ingabe ohulumeni baseNtshonalanga bakhululekile futhi banentando yeningi noma balalela i-oligarchy?
Angivumelani neqiniso lokuthi balalela i-oligarchy. Kufana nezintatheli, ukungena enqubweni yezombangazwe futhi ukuze wamukelwe, kufanele ubhalisele umbono othile. Futhi labo abaphethe, kuzo zonke izinhlangothi, babelana ngombono othize owokwakhiwa kwe-Europe, ukuhwebelana kwezwe, lokho okubizwa ngokuthi ukuhweba mahhala, lokho okubizwa ngokuthi imakethe ekhululekile, inkolelo ekhona kusukela ngaleso sikhathi. ngawo-1980 futhi ibusa ukucabanga kwabo bonke okuthiwa abantu abanomthwalo wemfanelo eNtshonalanga. Bonke laba bantu banombono ofanayo. Uma sithi bayawathola ama-oda bese sibabuza ngawo, bazophendula ngokuthi “cha akekho ongiyalelayo”. Kuyiqiniso ukuthi akekho obanika imiyalo. Izintatheli nosopolitiki bakhululekile, kodwa izingqinamba zohlelo zenza ukuthi labo abaphumelelayo, labo abahamba phambili futhi baqhubeke nokuba yingxenye yohlelo babe nendlela ethile yokubona umhlaba nokucabanga okubenza bamukeleke ohlelweni, kodwa ungawamukeli ama-oda.
Uzwile ngombiko wakamuva we-Oxfam okhuluma ngabantu abangama-26 abangabanikazi bengxenye yomcebo womhlaba. Ngabe lolu hlelo lonxiwankulu aluholeli yini ekushabalaleni kwesintu?
Ngicabanga ukuthi kunehaba ngoba angiboni ukuthi kungani uhlanga lwesintu lungashabalala. Akufanele futhi senze ihaba ngoba izinga lokuphila liye lenyuka ngokuhamba kwesikhathi emazweni amaningi oMhlaba Wesithathu, njengaseShayina nase-Afrika imbala.
Uhlelo lonxiwankulu lusiholela odongeni.
Lokho akuqinisekile. Ngiyavuma ukuthi kukhona ukungalingani kwezinkanyezi, kodwa lo mbiko we-Oxfam uvulekele ukugxekwa ngoba mayelana nalabo bantu abangama-26, umuntu kufanele ahlole ukuthi yini umuntu ayithatha njengempahla yabo nokuthi ulinganisela kanjani okungokwabanye abantu. Izinombolo ziyangabazeka. Ukuthi kunokungalingani okwandayo, akukho ukungabaza ngakho, kodwa ngakolunye uhlangothi kukhona nezinga lokuphila elikhulayo ngenxa yobuchwepheshe nesayensi. Angikuvikeli lokho kungalingani, kodwa ngiphikisana nakakhulu nobudlelwano bamandla obuvunyelwa yilokhu kungalingani. Kodwa akukhona ukuthi lokhu kungalingani kuyakhula okwenza isintu sinyamalale. Angikholwa ngoba ukukhiqizwa kwezolimo kwenyuke kakhulu.
Lona umbono kasosayensi ukuthi wena.
Ngiyisazi sefiziksi. Ososayensi, ngaphandle kwalabo abazinikele esimweni sezulu, abazona izinhlekelele.
Ubhale izincwadi ezimbalwa ngokubambisana noNoam Chomsky. Awucabangi ukuthi incwadi yakhe eyabhalwa no-Edward S. Herman "Imvume yokukhiqiza" ibaluleke kakhulu ukuqonda indima yabezindaba kanye nenkulumo-ze yabo enkonzweni yombuso?
Yebo, abakubonisayo kuyisibonelo se-propaganda, kodwa kubalulekile ukusho ukuthi kubo kwakungekho ubuchopho bangempela ohlelweni lwethu. Abantu bakhululekile kwabezindaba. Ngicabanga ukuthi ngisho nasezinhlelweni zobushiqela, ngezinye izikhathi bakhululekile, okungukuthi, okungenani labo abangena ohlelweni futhi bahambisane nemibono yesimiso. Yiqiniso, zikhona izimo lapho bengekho mahhala. Kodwa siyabona ukuthi kunabantu abafana noChris Hedges, Glenn Greenwald, Seymour Hersh nezinye izintatheli eziningi ezaziwayo ebezikhona ohlelweni futhi eziphume ngoba zicikwa wuhlelo noma uhlelo lungasabavumeli ukuthi basebenze ngaphakathi. yona. Banjalo abantu de facto uxoshwe ngezizathu ezingokwengqondo.
Kwenzeka kanjani ukuthi le mithombo yezindaba ye-propaganda enkonzweni ye-oligarchy iziqhenya ngokukhuluma ngezindaba ezingezona iqiniso kuyilapho ingayekanga ukubikela umphakathi ngokungeyikho phakathi nakho konke ukungenelela kwama-imperial e-Iraq, eLibya, eSiriya njll. Ingabe imithombo yezindaba yombuso isenakho ukwethembeka noma ukuziphatha?
Cha, ngicabanga ukuthi abanayo, yebo, kodwa zonke izindaba ezingamanga zizama ukuqinisa umbono ngoba zithi izindaba ezingamanga zibangelwa amanethiwekhi omphakathi, amaRussia, njll. Kuningi izindaba ezingamanga ezinkundleni zokuxhumana. ungakuphikisi lokho, kodwa abezindaba abajwayelekile basebenzisa lokho njengesikhali ukuze bazivikele. Bafuna ukudicilela phansi isithunzi sabo bonke abagxeki bemithombo yezindaba kanye nalo lonke ulwazi oluhlukile. Ngolunye ulwazi, kufanele unake futhi uthole imithombo efanele.
Ucabangani ngokuthula okuvala izindlebe okuzungeze impi yobugebengu yaseSaudi Arabia ngokumelene nabantu baseYemen?
Kubi impela. Sithengisela iSaudi Arabia izikhali. Futhi iSaudi Arabia iseduze kakhulu no-Israyeli phakathi kwamazwe ama-Arab. Abakwazi ukusho ukuthi bahlangene ngokusobala ne-Israel ngoba iyizwe lamaSulumane, kodwa basondelene kakhulu no-Israel njengoba umuntu engaba njalo ngenkathi esengumbuso wamaSulumane. Futhi ngaphezu kwalokho, bakhuthaza i-jihadism yonke indawo emhlabeni wama-Arab. Futhi thina, sihlangene nalo mbuso, ngenxa yezizathu ezintathu: izingalo, uwoyela no-Israyeli. Ngesikhathi secala likaKhashoggi, uTrump wayenamagama abucayi kakhulu ngeSaudi Arabia kodwa isikhohliwe manje. Bafuna ukuketula uMaduro ngokumbiza ngondlovukayiphikiswa kodwa ngeke bayithinte iSaudi Arabia.
Ungathini indoda ezinikele oyikho kubo bonke abalwi emhlabeni abamelana ne-imperialism kanye neZionism?
Ngicabanga ukuthi basesimweni esingcono kunasesikhathini esidlule, ngoba bobabili iRussia neChina banikeza ukumelana ne-United States, iRussia ngokusobala kuneChina, kodwa kukhona ukumelana kwangempela. Inkinga ye-Europe ukuthi isabambekile emcabangweni wokuzithoba e-United States. Emhlabeni wonke, ngicabanga ukuthi izinto zihamba kangcono kakhulu, kunomlando ophathelene nokwenza buthaka i-United States - eLatin America, kuncike emazweni - futhi ngandlela thile futhi neZionism. Kunesikhathi lapho abantu bethanda u-Israyeli, namuhla akusenjalo.
Ilungelo elidlulele libuyele kwamanye amazwe aseLatin America, Argentina, Brazil, njll.
Kuyinkimbinkimbi. Ilungelo elikude lihlomule ebunzimeni bemibuso yamanxele. I-United States ibhekene nokuhlasela eLatin America, kodwa ngaphambi kwalokho, yayibusa yonke into eLatin America, Europe, Middle East, njll. bona. E-Afghanistan, bavinjelwe. Kwa-Israyeli, akekho obathandayo, ngisho nase-United States. AbaseMelika babelawula iRussia ngesikhathi sikaYeltsin, manje abasayilawuli. I-China, singasho ukuthi iba ngokuzimela. Isimo se-United States emhlabeni sibi kakhulu. U-Trump unomgomo we-imperialist ngaphezu kwalokho ayethembisile, ngokuqinisekile, kodwa ngakolunye uhlangothi, ngenxa yobuntu bakhe, naye uzondwa.
Ucabanga ukuthi sinomhlaba onama-multipolar njengamanje?
Kunzima ukusho. Kunoma yikuphi, abaseYurophu kufanele bazimele kodwa lokho akubonakali kwenzeka.
Ingxoxo eyenziwa nguMohsen Abdelmoumen
Ubani uDkt. Jean Bricmont?
UDkt. Jean Bricmont uyisazi sefiziksi saseBelgium. Unguprofesa osafufusa wesayensi yetiyetha e-Catholic University of Louvain (Belgium) futhi uyilungu leRoyal Academy yaseBelgium. Wathola iPh.D. ngo-1976 e-Catholic University of Louvain. Wasebenza njengomcwaningi eRutgers University wabe esefundisa ePrinceton University, e-United States. Ucwaningo lwakhe lumtholele omehluko ababili: Umklomelo we-J. Deruyts weRoyal Academy of Belgium ngo-1996 kanye nomklomelo weminyaka emihlanu we-FNRS (A. Leeuw-Damry-Bourlart) ngo-2005.
UJean Bricmont waziwa nangokuthi isishoshovu esinengqondo esizihlanganisa nezihlakaniphi zaseMelika ezifana noNoam Chomsky, u-Alan Sokal, njll. Ungumbhali wezincwadi ezimbalwa, okuhlanganisa. Ukungaqini Kwengqondo (2003) no-Alan Sokal; Imperialalism: Ukusebenzisa Amalungelo Abantu Ukuthengisa Impi (2007); Ukwenza umqondo we-Quantum Mechanics (2016); I-Chomsky Notebook (2010) noJulie Franck kanye noNoam Chomsky; Imihlaba Efihliwe ku-Quantum Physics noDkt. Gérard Gouesbet (2013) ; Umsebenzi noNoam Chomsky (2013); Raison contre pouvoir : Le pari de Pascal noNoam Chomsky (2009); Le monde qui pourrait être : Socialisme, anarchisme et anarcho-syndicalisme noBertrand Russel (2014); A l'ombre des Lumières : Débat entre un philosophe et un scientifique no-Régis Debray (2003), njll.
I-ZNetwork ixhaswa kuphela ngokuphana kwabafundi bayo.
Nikela