Impikiswano engezansi mayelana neSiriya noRichard Seymour. U-Richard ungumbhali we-"Lenin's Tomb", owake waba negalelo elivamile kuwebhusayithi ye-Media Lens, futhi manje ungumnikezeli ovamile we-Op-ed ku-UK Guardian.
Inkulumompikiswano yethu igqugquzelwe yilokhu okuthunyelwe kwakhe kwebhulogi kwakamuva maqondana neSyria.
http://www.leninology.com/2012/07/the-syrian-revolt-enters-new-phase.html
Sawubona Richard.
Vele ufunde ibhulogi yakho yakamuva ngeSyria.
Isikhulu esiphezulu samalungelo abantu ku-UN, uNavi Pillay, sishilo
"Ukuhlinzekwa kwezikhali kuhulumeni waseSyria nakubaphikisi bawo kukhuthaza udlame. Noma yikuphi ukungezwani kwempi kumele kugwenywe ngazo zonke izindlela."
Ingabe uyawusekela umbono wokuvinjelwa kwezikhali nhlangothi zombili?
UJoe Emersberger
SEYMOUR: Cha, angikubizi ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali. Ngicabanga ukuthi lokho kuvumela umbuso ohlomile ongcono. Ngicabanga ukuthi okuhamba phambili kwethu kufanele kube ukumisa ukudunwa kwe-impiriyali yokuvukela kunokunqanda ukuvukela.
IMPENDULO YAMI: Akukhona yini ukunikezwa kwezikhali kwangaphandle kanye nolunye usizo lwezempi olunikezwa amandla e-NATO namakhasimende awo kumavukela-mbuso ahlomile ukuthi yini eyenza "ukudunwa" okuphikisana nakho. Ihlinzeka ngesikhuthazo esinamandla - uma singeqisi - sokuthembela kubaxhasi abanamandla kunokusekela ngobuningi.
Ngifaka "ukudunwa kwezimoto" kumacaphuno coz ibhulogi yakho ingishiya kude nokuqiniseka ukuthi lokhu akukenzeki.
Kungenzeka kanjani ukuthi i-embargo ehlangothini eyodwa kuphela kuhulumeni waseSyria iholele ekususweni kwezempi - ukubeka eceleni ukuthi kungenzeka ukuthi iRussia neChina bavumelane nakho?
SEYMOUR: Ukuze kucace, ngishilo ukuthi angihambisani nokuvinjelwa kwezikhali, hhayi ukuthi ngikhetha ukuvinjelwa kohlangothi olulodwa. Ngicabanga ukuthi lesi yisixazululo esingamanga.
Mayelana nokudunwa kwezimoto - lapho amavukelambuso athenga khona izikhali akuyona into enqumayo ukuthi uguquko luphela kanjani nokuthi ngokwemibandela kabani. Isici esinqumayo ukuthi ingabe uquqaba lukhishwe inyumbazane, njengoba kwakunjalo ngenkathi uQadhafi eqala ukunqoba izihlubuki lapho: kwaba ukudilizwa komzabalazo othandwayo ngaphansi kokuhlaselwa okuchitha igazi okwavumela ubuholi ukuba bakhe umbimbi ne-imperialism. Kulokhu, imibuso yama-impiriyali encintisanayo ayinalo igunya phezu kwezombusazwe, i-tempo noma amaqhinga omzabalazo. Noma ngabe ubuholi be-SNC busafuna ukudlala indima efana nobuholi be-NTC, (okungenzeka abanye babo benze), buncane kakhulu ukulawula ipolitiki namasu ama-LCC, noma amabutho. Ngaphezu kwalokho, banamaqembu ezimbangi ezombusazwe ahlanganisa amabutho e-left-nationalist kanye namaKurdish alwela ubuholi, inkinga i-NTC ingazange ibe nayo njengoba ngokuyisisekelo yayingekho iNxele ehlelekile eLibya ngenxa yezimo zengcindezelo eJamahiriya. Alikho nje ithuluzi elitholakala kuma-imperialism ukuze lilawule lo mzabalazo njengamanje.
IMPENDULO YAMI: Kuyathakazelisa lokho. Uthanda ngempela - noma awunandaba - ukuvumela izingalo zigeleze nhlangothi zombili?
Uma ngicabangela ukuchema kwe-UN, ngisiboni isizathu esincane sokungabaza lokho uNavi Pillay akusho mayelana nezikhali ezibhebhezela impi yempi ("udlame").
Ngicabanga ukuthi ubukela phansi kakhulu amandla amakhulu (kanye namakhasimende awo) amandla okubhubhisa uma ubhala ukuthi "Akukho thuluzi elitholakalayo ku-imperialism ukuze lilawule lo mzabalazo okwamanje."
Akudingekile ukuthi basungule "ukulawula" ukwenza inani elimangalisayo lomonakalo. Ngokuvamile abaqali "ukulawula" ezindaweni lapho bengenela khona ngokubulala.
SEYMOUR: Angikholwa ukuthi ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali kuzosiza uguquko. Yilokho umbandela wami. Angivumi ukuthi ukuhamba kwezikhali yikho okubhebhezela impi yombango; kunalokho, impendulo yezempi yombuso waseSyria ebhebhezela impi, futhi ukwehlulwa kwayo kuphela okungakuqeda.
Ngokuphambene nalokho okushoyo, angiwabukeli phansi amandla *ombuso* wokubhubhisa. Kodwa simane asivumelani ngokubaluleka kokungenelela kwabo esimweni *esikhona*: ama-imperialists *akuwona* imithombo eyinhloko yodlame e-Syria namuhla. Bangenelela ngokusemandleni ukuzama ukutshekisa ibhalansi ukuze bavune umphumela abawufunayo, futhi endabeni ye-US namadlelandawonye ayo isu labo wukuzama ukuhlanganisa ubuholi bezepolitiki obuhlanganiswe yizingxenye zombuso ezihlubukayo ezingazifaka ekuvukeleni. futhi ulicekele phansi, njengaseLibhiya. Kuze kube manje, alukho uphawu abangakufeza lokhu. USarkozy wakhononda ngalokhu ngaphambi kokuba akhishwe: ebeka ngamafuphi, "thina emazweni aseNtshonalanga singathanda *ukungenelela futhi sisekele imbangela yenu, kodwa anibumbene futhi angeke sethembe ukuthi sizokwazi ukulawula isimo" . Futhi lokho kulungile: ama-LCC, amabutho kanye namanye amabutho ezombusazwe angeke abhalisele ukungenelela.
Btw, kufanele ngempela sicabange ngobuhlakani bokuthi uguquko oludume kakhulu ngokumelene nombuso ongathandwa kakhulu eMpumalanga Ephakathi kuya kuma-imperialism ase-US, ngesikhathi lapho impiriyali yase-US izama ngamandla ukuhlehlisa ukufana okuthile kokwethembeka ngokubonakala injalo. ngasohlangothini lwezinguquko...
IMPENDULO YAMI: Angiboni ukuthi kungani sidinga ukuhalalisela amavukela-mbuso ahlomile ukuthi anqobe u-Assad njengoba kufanele sikujabulele - noma, ngokufanelekile, ukucabanga mayelana - ama-Palestine axosha abahlali bakwa-Israel.
Akumele sijabulele u-Assad ukuthi naye aphihlize izitha zakhe.
Ungakhuluma ngokufaneleka kokuziphatha kodlame lwasePalestine olubhekiswe kubahlali ngokwesibonelo. Imiphumela yomhlaba wangempela yokuhlohla izingalo kubo ingokunye. Angiwuthengi umqondo othi u-Assad usezowa kodwa lokho kuqeda impi kungenzeka noma nini uma umbuso wakhe ukuphishekela lokho.
Ungase ufune ukukhumbula okwenzeka ku-Aristide, uZelaya kanye (kafushane) noHugo Chavez. Ukuphishekela indlela enentando yeningi ngokuphelele futhi engenalo udlame kunikeza ukuzivikela okuncane ekushintsheni umbuso osekelwa amazwe angaphandle. Ukuthobela ngokuphelele kukaSaddam Hussein nezimfuno zaseNtshonalanga zokuthi akhiphe izikhali akwenzanga lutho ukuvimbela ukuhlasela kwe-Iraq. Angiboni zizathu zokuthi ngimemezele ngokuzethemba ukuthi iningi lamaSyria lijabulela ukuthi amavukelambuso aketula uhulumeni ngodlame.
Lokho kubheke ohlangothini lwemiphumela ebikezelwayo nesabekayo yempi yombango esekelwe entshonalanga.
SEYMOUR: Akudingeki ujabule ngomuntu vele, kodwa mina ngihalalisela abahlubuki, njengoba nje ngizojabula lapho amaPalestine namadlelandawonye abo ehlula u-Israyeli. Uthi awuboni ukuthi kungani 'sidinga' ukwenza lokhu. Ngizikhulumela ngokuqinile, ngivumelana nazo zonke izinhlangano ezilwela inkululeko, futhi angikubeki imibandela kulokho kusekelwa. Lokhu ukunyakaza okunjalo; Ngiyakweseka. Ukuthi 'udinga' ukwabelana ngalokho kuhlola, ngeke ngicabange ukusho.
Ngesaba ukuthi angiyiqondi ingxabano mayelana "nezikhali ezidubulayo" kumaPalestine. Uma ngabe bekukhona, ake sithi, iqembu le-leftist ebelifakela izikhali, futhi engangingaba nomthelela - njengoba nje ama-Jeanson brigades efaka izikhali ku-FLN - khona-ke besizokwazi ukuxoxa ngalokho. Njengoba kunje, ngiyabuzwa ukuthi ngingeseka noma ngicele ukuthi kuvinjwe izikhali nhlangothi zombili eSyria. Futhi uma isifaniso sibambelela, khona-ke lokhu kufana nokucelwa ukuthi usekele ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali 'nhlangothi zombili' e-Israel-Palestine. Hhayi-ke, njengoba ubuza, ngicabanga ukuthi lokho kungaba isimo esingenangqondo kunoma yimuphi umuntu ongakwesokunxele ukuthi asithathe: asifuni ukuthi amaPalestine ahlome? Ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali cishe kuhlale kuthinta amaqembu abuthaka, kuyilapho amaqembu aqinile ethola izindlela zokuyizungeza, ayishaye indiva, ayizibe, njll. Ngakho-ke ukubiza i-embargo yezikhali - ngokuphambene, ake sithi, ukuzama ukumisa ohulumeni bethu ekuhlomiseni izikhali. abahlaseli - kungishaya njengesenzo esiyize nokuzikhukhumeza.
Ungimema ukuthi ngiqhathanise u-Assad no-Chavez no-Aristide. Ngesaba ukuthi ngizothola lokhu kuxosha i-juxtaposition. U-Assad ungumashiqela, usebenzisa izinqubomgomo ze-neoliberal, ohlela inhlangano yonxiwankulu bakahulumeni ngendlela eqhubekayo yengcindezelo nengamahlelo. Uphendule kulokho okwakuwumbhikisho ongenalo udlame ngempela ngokuwuhlenga, ngokuthi amasosha akhe ahlomile adubule futhi abulale ababhikishi abanokuthula: futhi ngaleyo ndlela wakhiqiza abaphikisi abahlomile. (Lokhu kusho, ngendlela, ukuthi asikho isidingo sokuphikisana ngokuthi umbuso waseSyria ungayiqeda le mpi kusasa noma cha; okudingeka sikwazi ukuthi uye waphishekela impi futhi akakaze nakanye ayeke leli qhinga. noma ekubulaweni kwabantu abaningi obekubandakanya, yingakho noma iyiphi inkulumo yezingxoxo ishoda ngokuphelele). Uma noma yikuphi kwalokhu kungashiwo ngoChavez noma u-Aristide, futhi kungenzeki, khona-ke uChavez uzobe engasekho futhi u-Aristide ubezokhishwa maduze nje. Futhi abambalwa abanxele babezolila. Ngoba ngaleso sikhathi babengeke babe nesibindi, ama-radicals kwesokunxele abenza konke okusemandleni abo ukusebenzisa ihhovisi elikhethiwe ukunika amandla abantu babo.
Ubhekisela ngokungacacile futhi ngokuvamile ekushintsheni kombuso osekelwa amazwe angaphandle. Kodwa kusho ukuthini lokhu? Ngokusobala kungasho noma yini kusukela kumaqembu abulalayo e-CIA kanye nokuqothulwa kohlanga okuhlangene nabanikazi bezitolo zomjuluko abadlula esiqhingini esincane beya kuguquko oludumile ngokungena okulinganiselwe kakhulu kwamandla angaphandle. Ngokunokwenzeka, ngenxa yokuthi amanye amandla angaphandle ayejabule ukubona uMubarak ehamba, lokho kuketulwa “kwakusekelwe kwelinye izwe” ukushintsha kombuso. Noma yiliphi igama elibanzi ngalolu hlelo ekusebenzeni kwalo alisho lutho. Ngokunjalo negama lakho elithi "impi yombango esekelwe kwamanye amazwe".
Uyagomela ukuthi awuboni sizathu sokuthi "ngokuzethemba okungaka" ukuthi "iningi lamaSyria" lifuna uhulumeni uketulwe ngobudlova. Kodwa angenzanga isimemezelo esinjalo. Akunakwenzeka ukwazi ngokuqinisekile ukuthi "iningi lamaSiriya" lalifunani, njengoba kwakunzima ukwazi ukuthi "iningi lamaGibhithe" lalifunani ngesikhathi sokuwa kukaMubarak. Ukuvukela umbuso akuzona izinqubo eziqhutshwa ngokuvota, futhi akufani nokuthi kukhona owake wanikezwa izwi lokuthi i-Baath Party kufanele ibuse i-Syria. Futhi akufani nokuthi kukhona amandla esithathu abalulekile ongakhetha kuwo phakathi kombuso nabasekeli bawo, kanye namavukelambuso njengoba amiswe njengamanje. Uma kubhekwa lokhu, umuntu akayidingi inhlolovo noma umphumela wokuvota ukuze enze isinqumo; ukukhetha kuphakathi kobushiqela nenhlangano ethandwayo, futhi ngikhetha lokhu kwakamuva ngaphandle kokuxolisa.
IMPENDULO YAMI: Ngicabanga ukuthi sidinga (okungukuthi kufanele) sizame ukuvimbela enye i-Iraq, Enye i-Libya. Lena imiphumela cishe engafinyeleleki. Ngeshwa, kungenzeka kakhulu. "Izinhlangano zenkululeko yangempela" obhala ngazo ziyakwamukela - ngentshiseko - ukusuka enkundleni yezempi lapho zivame ukuba buthaka ziye kwezombusazwe lapho zinamandla khona. Akumangazi, ngokwesibonelo, ukuthi ukunyakaza kwentando yeningi eLatin America kuseduze nokubuthaka kakhulu eColombia lapho ukungqubuzana kusalokhu kugcwele impi.
Ngicabanga ukuthi abantu bangaphandle abazama "ukusekela" umzabalazo osemthethweni wamaPalestine ngokuthunyelwa kwezikhali kungaba yinhlekelele ngenxa yezizathu ezisobala. Futhi qaphela, lokho kuhlangothini lokuziphatha kwabantu basePalestine besebenzisa udlame olubhekiswe kwamasosha akwa-Israel. Ukugcina umzabalazo ungowezempi ovuna iqembu elinamandla - hhayi ukuvinjelwa okuphelele kwezikhali.
Angikumemanga ukuthi uqhathanise u-Assad, ongumashiqela, no-Aristide, Chavez, Zelaya – izinhloko zezwe ezikhethwe ngentando yeningi. Ngicela nje ukuthi ukhumbule ukuthi lapho kungekho nhlobo "ukuhlaselwa" okunodlame kwabaphikisayo, abezindaba basentshonalanga basungula ngempumelelo eyodwa ngokuthanda kwe-US kanye nabalingani bayo. Ngiphinde ngakucela ukuthi ukhumbule ukuthi ukuthobela izimfuno zaseNtshonalanga - njengase-Iraq ngaphansi kuka-Hussien - kungaba kubi kakhulu bese kungenamsebenzi futhi empeleni kube yingozi kakhulu kunokudelela. Uma kukude kakhulu nokusobala ukuthi u-Assad, noma uGaddafi ngaphambi kwakhe, ubengavimba ukuketulwa esikhundleni ngendlela ehlukile lapho kukhona amavukelambuso ahlomile anikezwa ugqozi olunamandla kakhulu - ngamagunya amakhulu - ukuthi aqhubeke engaguquki ngokuphelele.
Ngemuva kwe-Iraq ne-Libya (kanye ne-Haiti, i-Honduras) angikwazi ukwamukela ukuthi umbuso osekelwa amazwe wangaphandle ushintshile kuwumqondo oyindida. Ukuyivimba kufanele kube yinto eza kuqala kithi.
SEYMOUR: Ngicabanga ukuthi enye i-Iraq ayinakwenzeka kakhulu. I-US ayifuni ukwenza amasosha ayo kwenye impi yezwe. Ubuholi bezempi bucace kakhulu ngalokhu.
Ngicabanga ukuthi enye iLibya inethuba elikhulu kunenye i-Iraq, kodwa namanje akwenzeki ezimweni. Lokhu kungenxa yokuthi ithuba lokungenelela okwenzekile eLibya kwaba umphumela wokuhlangana okuqondile kwezimo ezingazivezi lapha. Ukusho lokhu: 1) ukuvukela uQadhafi kwenzeka esimweni lapho amaJamahiriya ayekhiphe wonke amaqembu aphikisayo (ngokwesisekelo sokuthi amaqembu nezinyunyana nokunye kwakuyizigaba ezicindezelayo ezazingadingeki emphakathini okhululekile wezenhlalakahle), futhi lokhu kwakusho ukuthi kwakuyisiko elincane kakhulu lokuzihlanganisa okuthandwayo, kungekho mnyakazo wabasebenzi futhi kungekho kwesokunxele - okuhluke kakhulu kwelaseGibhithe ngalokhu; 2) umbuso ngokushesha waphoqeleka ukuba umbango ungene endaweni yezempi, futhi ngokushesha ngemva kwalokho waqala ukunqoba kahle kakhulu, wahlasela amavukelambuso ayengahlomile kahle kakhulu, okwabangela ukuthi iningi lesixuku esasibuthene futhi lasiza ukulawula amadolobha amakhulu namadolobhana aqala ukuncibilika futhi ahlehlela ezindlini zawo ngokwesaba ukuphindiselwa; 3) amandla abusayo avela ekupheleni kukaFebhuwari nasekuqaleni kukaMashi kwakuyizici zombuso wangaphambili kanye nezigaba zesigaba esibusayo - abantu ababevele benamandla omphakathi futhi ababesebenzelana namandla ase-US kanye ne-EU iminyaka embalwa emihle ngenkathi. U-Qadhafi wabaxosha - futhi yibona abasungula okuwukuphela kwabo abameleli bezombusazwe abahlubukayo, iNational Transitional Council; 4) kusukela ekuqaleni komzabalazo waseLibya, onxiwankulu babebanga umbimbi ne-imperialism, kwathi lapho ukunqotshwa kwakukhula baqala ukunqoba amaqembu antengantengayo, okwathi ekugcineni lapho sebexoxisana ngesivumelwano ne-imperialism kwakungekho ukuphikiswa. nhlobo. Ngicabanga ukuthi lezi zimo (ukungabikho kombutho wangakwesokunxele omelene nama impiriyali, ukubusa kweqembu elilodwa lezombusazwe lonxiwankulu, ukunqotshwa okusheshayo, ukuntuleka kwenhlangano ethandwayo, ukucwaswa ngokushesha koquqaba) yizimo ezingavamile kwavimba ukuvukela okwabe kufushane kakhulu ngesikhathi sokufukamela ngenxa yezimo zeJamihiriya engizishilo. Azisebenzi nhlobo eSyria. Lokhu akusho ukuthi abukho ubungozi bokuthi i-US *ingakwazi* ukuduna umzabalazo waseSyria, kodwa okwamanje angikabuboni *ubufakazi bokuthi lokhu kwenzekile ngempela: kude kakhulu nakho, amabutho ahleliwe abusayo emhlabeni. yenqaba ukubandakanyeka kwe-US, amaqembu ahlomile ahluke kakhulu, awahlukanisiwe futhi abekwe endaweni ukuthi aguqulwe abe ummeleli, futhi ubudlelwano phakathi kobuholi be-SNC namanye amabutho ezepolitiki kanye namasosha kanye nezimpande buyaphikisana kakhulu futhi buqhelile ukuba bangabuqonda. bakwazi ukuzibophezela ngendlela ye-NTC.
Mayelana nePalestine, masingathatheki: akekho othumela izikhali kubo, okungenani awekho amaqembu angakwesokunxele engiwaziyo. Akuyona impikiswano yangempela. Iphuzu lami laliwukuthi angiboni ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali ukusiza amaPalestine. Ngicabanga ukuthi umthwalo kufanele kube kuphela ekuphucweni u-Israyeli, umhlukumezi, izikhali. Lowo umgomo obambekayo ongafezwa, nakuba kube nobunzima obuthile (okungukuthi kudinga ukunyakaza kwabantu abaningi emiphakathini yama-imperialist). E-Syria, angiboni lutho olungenziwa ngokuyikho ukunqamula umhlaseli, ngoba umhlaseli uhlonywe yiRussia. Futhi kuleso simo angiyena owokuvimba amavukelambuso, ngoba lokho kuzoholela ekunqotshweni kwabo okuchitha igazi.
Nithi ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali kunqanda abanamandla futhi kusize ababuthakathaka; akunjalo ngempela. Uma kuvela ekucindezelweni okudumile futhi kubhekiswe kubahlaseli (okungukuthi, uma benqanda imibuso yama-imperialist ekuhlomeni ngezikhali), lokho kungasiza ngezinye izikhathi – okungukuthi iNingizimu Afrika. Kodwa uma bekhomba 'izinhlangothi zombili', njengesibonelo ngeMpi Yombango yaseSpain noma ngesikhathi sokuvinjelwa kwe-US ePalestine ngo-1947, ngokuvamile balimaza amaqembu abuthaka kakhulu. Okokuqala ngoba ngokujwayelekile *baqondisa* ababuthaka, okwesibili ngoba nalapho bengekho khona, amaqembu aqinile anezinsiza eziningi zokuxoxisana eduze kwawo. Ngokuphambene nalokho okubonakala ukucabangela, ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali akubangeli ukuhoxiswa: lokho kulandela kuphela ushintsho ezimweni zezombusazwe.
Mayelana nokuthi u-Assad ubengakugwema yini ukuketulwa; kahle, akusiyo inkinga yami ukwethembeka. Angizami ukubala ukuthi u-Assad ubengazikhulula kanjani: Anginandaba nesiphetho sakhe. Ngimane ngisho ukuthi ekuqaleni kwalo mzabalazo, wawungenalo udlame; leli bekuyisu lokuzicabangela lona ohlangothini lwamaqembu aphikisayo; kanti kwathatha izinyanga zengcindezelo ngaphambi kokuba kuqhamuke amaqembu ahlomile ezindaweni ezehlukene futhi, ahlangana nabahlubukile ebuthweni, amemezela ukusungulwa kweFree Syrian Army. Ngamanye amazwi, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi u-Assad wayengenza noma yini ukuze agweme ukuketulwa, wakhetha ngokuqaphela isu lokubhidliza kwezempi ngesikhathi lapho abaphikisi babekhethe ngamabomu isu lokubhikisha ngokuthula. Ngakho-ke, icala lokwenziwa impi yempi - ngempela, icala lokuthi kunomzabalazo kwasekuqaleni - lisemahlombe ka-Assad kanye nesigaba esibusayo saseSyria.
Uqagela 'ngemibuso emikhulu' enikeza amavukelambuso ahlomile 'isisusa esinamandla' sokuthi 'ahlale engaguquki ngokuphelele'. Lokhu kuvele kungishaye njengempumputhe: uphuthelwe yini okwenzekile kusukela kwaqala ukuvukela? Ukungalaleli kusehlangothini lombuso; konke ukuqagela mayelana nalokho 'amandla amakhulu' abengakuzuza ukube bekudinga kulokhu kuphambene nephuzu. Iqiniso liwukuthi kusazoqhubeka kube nezinxushunxushu kanye neziyaluyalu esifundeni, ezinye zazo ezithinta izifundazwe nemibuso i-US ebikade iphikisana nayo ngokomlando. Kwesinye isikhathi i-US izokwazi ukungenelela, kwesinye isikhathi ngeke; ngesinye isikhathi ukungenelela kwayo kuzoba yisinqumo, futhi kwesinye isikhathi ngeke. Iphuzu alikona ukwahlulela kusengaphambili isimo, kodwa ukunquma ngokuqondile ukuthi kwenzekani: imibuzo yokuthi yiziphi izinhlobo zamandla ezisebenza phansi, yiziphi izivumelwano zekilasi ezitholakalayo, yimiphi imibono ehilelekile, izinga lokuzihlanganisa okudumile, ubudlelwano phakathi kwempi nengcindezelo, isisekelo esiqondile senhlalo-mnotho sombuso, njll., akuzona izinto ezikhathazayo ezingashiwo ngemuva kokuba sekutholakele ukuthi umbuso ukuluphi uhlangothi lokuqhekeka kwama-impiriyali - lena *yimibuzo. Yimibuzo *eyisisekelo*, yonke into ebalulekile njengombuzo we-imperialism uqobo. Lokhu yikho iningi lalabo abaphikisana nesikhundla sakho elibukeka lingakuthathi ngokungathi sína.
IMPENDULO YAMI:Ucela ukucatshangelwa okuncane (ukuqagela okungabazekayo lapho) ukuze ulungise isimo esihlukanayo ezingeni elikhulu. Uguquko lombuso olusekelwa yi-US e-Iraq, eLibya, eHaiti, eHonduras (naseVenezuela lapho lubhuntshiwe khona kuze kube manje) - zonke ziyahlukahluka ngemininingwane yazo. Esinye kuphela salezo zibonelo esihilela ukuthunyelwa isikhathi eside kwamasosha ase-US owavezayo. Bonke baye bahilela ukubambisana okuphawulekayo nokusekelwa okuvela kwamanye amandla ombuso anemigomo namagugu afana kakhulu. Kuzo zonke lezi zimo ungaphikisana ngezinga i-US empeleni elilawula ngayo noma “idune” abaphikisi. Lokho kuhlangothini lomthelela olimaza ngendlela emangalisayo wokungenelela kwe-US (ngokuvamile kusizwa amanye amandla amakhulu). Ukuthi kufanele sivimbele “enye i-Iraq” noma “enye i-Lybia” (noma enye iHaiti nenye iHonduras) kumane kusho ukuvimbela imibuso emikhulu ekubhebhezeleni elinye futhi igazi. Uma kubhekwa imiphumela enyantisayo kuwo wonke amazwe engiwashilo (ngaphandle kwaseVenezuela lapho umbuso uvinjelwe khona kuze kube manje) ngeke ngikuthole ukuqagela kwakho mayelana nokungenzeka kuhambisana kakhulu noma ngikuthola kukholisa (futhi angikwenzi). Ngithatha ukuhlola kuka-Navi Pilla (kucatshangelwa ukuchema kwe-UN) njengobufakazi obanele bokuphetha ngokuthi kuyenzeka kakade futhi kungenzeka kube kubi kakhulu.
Mayelana nePalestine (lapho ukumelana nezikhali kwa-Israyeli kubuthakathaka kakhulu kunokumelana nezikhali eSyria nombuso ka-Assad) kusobala ukuthi ukuvinjelwa kwezikhali okuphelele nhlangothi zombili kungaba usizo kakhulu ekuqedeni umsebenzi. Kungaba wusizo kanjani emhlabeni kuma-leftists asentshonalanga ukuthi "i-jolly good show" uma amabhomu asePalestine azibulalayo ephumelele ukubulala ojenene abaningi bakwa-Israel? [QAPHELA MFUNDI Ukusabela okubhalwe ku-Twitter kukachwepheshe “wakwesokunxele” wase-UK u-Owen Jones ekubulaweni kwezikhulu zase-Syria "Adios Assad. Ngiyethemba"] Uma intshisekelo yakho isekuvimbeni iqembu elinamandla, kanye nokufeza ukuhoxiswa kwezempi, akunjalo. ukuthi okuphambene ncamashí nalokho umuntu okufanele akwenze? Angikwazi ukucabanga indlela engcono evela kuzishoshovu ezisekela i-Palestine eNtshonalanga ukuze bazidelise kunokuba bajabulele ukumelana nezikhali - noma ukuphikisa imingcele yokumelana nezikhali - njengoba uphakamisa ukuthi senze eSyria. Eqinisweni, uma abashisekeli basentshonalanga bengadelelwa ngokuhalalisela amavukela-mbuso aseSyria, lokho kukodwa kusho okuningi mayelana nokuzethemba kwezikhungo zasentshonalanga emandleni azo okuthonya ingxabano.
SEYMOUR:Lokho okubiza ngokuthi "ukucatshangelwa okuncane" kuphakathi kwezinto ezibaluleke kakhulu ekuhlaziyeni noma yisiphi isimo sokuvukela: izinga lokuzihlanganisa okudumile; ukubandakanyeka kwesobunxele; izinhlobo zokumelwa kwezombangazwe; ukuqondanisa kwabancane abacindezelwe; izinga lokuzibandakanya nokulawula umzabalazo wezikhali; njll njll. Ngaphezu kwalokho, izitatimende zami mayelana nalokhu aziwona "ukuqagela okungabazisayo" njengoba usho, kodwa ukuqaphela okunesisekelo esiqinile. Ngenze ucwaningo olwanele ukusho lokhu ngokuzethemba.
Ukushintsha kombuso osekelwe e-US ngempela kuyehluka ngokwemininingwane; kodwa esisodwa kuphela sezibonelo osiphakamisile sihilela ukuthi i-US iduna uguquko futhi yalulawula, futhi leso sibonelo yiLibya: yingakho ngithe kuwe ukuphindwa kweLibya kungenzeka kakhulu kunokuphinda i-Iraq. : kodwa noma kunjalo, akunakwenzeka ngenxa yokungabikho kwezici eziyinhloko ezivumelayo. Ezinye izibonelo oziphakamisile - i-Iraq, i-Haiti, i-Honduras - azihlanganisi ukungena kwamabutho *aziwayo* kodwa ukushintshwa kombuso ngamabutho ahlomile angaphandle noma amaqembu angaphakathi esigaba esibusayo (imvamisa nje, kunomfelandawonye phakathi kwalokhu kokubili). Kungakho ukukhuluma ngendlela engacacile, namagama ajwayelekile mayelana 'nokuphikisa' akusizi: 'abaphikisayo' kwakungeyona into efanayo e-Iraq neyaseSyria, ngoba e-Iraq okwakubaluleke kakhulu 'kwabaphikisayo' kwakuyinqwaba yabashaya izandla. abadingisiwe hhayi inhlangano ehleleke kahle, ehlukene ngokwepolitiki.
Uma iphuzu lakho kuphela ukuthi kufanele sivimbele amandla ama-imperialist ekukhiqizeni igazi eSyria ngandlela thize, khona-ke umbuzo wokuthi lokhu kubaluleke kangakanani. *Kuyisinqumo ngokuphelele* empeleni: yimaphi amandla okungenzeka ukuthi akhiqize ukuchitheka kwegazi eSyria namuhla? Ingabe bangama-imperialists; bangamandla oguquko; noma bakuhulumeni waseSyria? Futhi ubufakazi obuqand' ikhanda bonyaka odlule nengxenye kube ukuthi nguhulumeni waseSyria. Ngakho-ke, akukho ukuqagela okudingekayo ukuze kwahlulele lokhu. Ngokuphambene nalokho, yisikhundla * sakho, lapho ubiza usongo lwempi yombango ekhiqizwa ikakhulukazi yi-imperialism, lokho kuyaqagela. Ngike ngabuza kaningi ukuthi, buyini *ubufakazi* bokubusa kwama impiriyali kulesi simo? Esinakho nje izinsolo zokubandakanyeka *okuncane*, okujwayelekile okuwumbiko wamaqembu okuqeqesha e-CIA emingceleni yaseSyria. Banesisindo esingakanani uma kuqhathaniswa namasosha endawo, amakomidi axhumanisa, i-NCC, amaqembu amaKurdish, njll njll? Banesisindo esingakanani uma kuqhathaniswa nombuso waseSyria? Ngokwesimo sakho, ukuthi i-imperialism yiyona nto ehamba phambili futhi ibaluleke kakhulu kunanoma yikuphi ukuvukela kwangaphakathi, ukuze kwenzeke, kufanele ucabange ngoba abukho ubufakazi ohlangothini lwakho - noma uma bukhona, ubunembese ngokuphawulekayo ekuthuleni. .
EPalestine, asivumelani nje. Ulokhu uphinda ukuthi i-embargo yezikhali ingaba usizo ekuqedeni umsebenzi, kodwa ngithola umqondo walokhu opaque ngokuphelele. Kunezibonelo eziningi kakhulu zokuvinjelwa kwezikhali ezisetshenziswa ukuvimba uhlangothi olubuthaka kuyilapho uhlangothi oluqinile, umhlaseli, luqhubeka nokuhloma. Umcabango wokuthi i-arms embargo = ukuchithwa kwezikhali akusimeme. Ngaphezu kwalokho, angiboni ukuthi ukubiza i-embargo yezikhali kuyokwenziwani: ubani ongalalela lokhu? Ngokuqondile, unganqanda isimo osebenza kuso ngemizabalazo yomphakathi. Lokhu kwenza sikwazi ukuthi sifune ukuthi amazwe akithi, ama-imperialist, ayeke ukuhlomisa u-Israyeli. Kodwa ayikho indlela, ngokwesibonelo, yokuthi iNxele emazweni angama-impiriyali izokwazi ukuvimba i-Iran ukuthi ithumele amarokhethi e-Hamas nanoma yiziphi ezinye izikhali eziyizigaxa enazo, noma ngabe lokhu bekuwukusetshenziswa okunengqondo kwamandla ayo. Inkinga enkulu kubantu basePalestine ukuthi *bazobhekana* nokuhlaselwa okuqhubekayo kanye nodlame, futhi ngenxa yobukhona babo abaningi njengesizwe esilindile, baye babhekana nokucabanga okucwasa ngokwebala ukuthi abanalo ilungelo lokuzivikela. I-Left, engakwazi ukumisa ukugeleza kwezikhali ku-Israel esikhathini esifushane kuya kwesikhashana, kufanele *okungenani * kube yibo abathi "ubudlova basePalestine busemthethweni futhi bufanelekile ekuzivikeleni". Futhi uma ukukhathazeka kwakho okukhulu kungukuthi *ukwethembeka*, angazi-ke ukuthi kungani ukhuluma nami: Anginantshisekelo yokubeka umbono odumile noma umqondo ovamile. Umuntu kufanele azilungiselele ukuba yidlanzana phezu kwezindaba ezibalulekile, ngaphandle kwalokho ngeke enze noma yimuphi umehluko nhlobo.
Okokugcina - hhayi ukuthi nginendaba ngempela, kodwa kuwukungahloniphi ukuthi awungitshelanga ukuthi uthumela lokhu kushintshana ku-Media Lens. Angizitsheli ngokuzenzakalelayo ukuthi lezo zincwadi zisetshenziswa umphakathi, futhi ngingaqagela ukuthi nabanye abaningi ababhalelana nabo abakwenzi lokho.
I-ZNetwork ixhaswa kuphela ngokuphana kwabafundi bayo.
Nikela