In the old George Carlin joke, the TV sportscaster announces: āHereās a partial score from the West Coast āĀ Los Angeles 6.ā
For a brilliant comedian like Carlin ā who skeweredĀ corporate power,Ā class structureĀ and political/mediaĀ propaganda ā thatās one of his more innocuous jokes. But itās sharply relevant today as corporate TV news outlets serve up a series of partial scores. Call it āpropaganda by omission.ā
Take the coverage that followed Thursdayās Democratic debate. Bernie Sanders didnāt object in the debate when Joe Biden hung a price tag on Sandersā āMedicare for Allā plan of $30 trillion (over 10 years). Sanders responded by offering the other score: āThat’s right, Joe. Status quo over 10 years will be $50 trillion. Every study done shows that Medicare for All is the most cost-effective approach to providing health care to every man, woman, and child in this country.ā
The $50 trillion figure for continuing the status quo (actually $47 trillion) comes from the āNational Health Expenditure Fact SheetāĀ of the federal governmentās Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
I checked the post-debate news coverage. As in the Carlin joke, I found many references to the partial score: the $30-32 trillion estimated cost of Sandersā legislation. But not the other score: the more costly estimate of sticking with a system in which health insurance is provided by for-profit corporations.
I watched, for example, the next dayāsĀ in-depthĀ report on CBS Evening News lasting a full two minutes. (Thatās āin-depthā nowadays on nightly newscasts.) The $32 trillion estimate was prominent, but the other score was omitted ā no estimate for staying with the status quo. When the report ended, anchor Nora OāDonnell accentuated the bias by saying:Ā “That’s an expensive plan, Ed. Thank you.”
CBS opened its report speaking of āgovernment-run healthcare plans being touted by liberal Democrats.ā Itās well-known that āgovernment-run healthcareā is aĀ GOP/Fox News/insurance industryĀ talking point. As is āgovernment takeoverā of healthcare.Ā Just ask GOP propagandist Frank Luntz.
Of course, when Medicare simply provides the coverage ā whether to older people today or everyone tomorrow ā thatās NOT āgovernment-run healthcare.ā
As I recently wrote to theĀ L.A. TimesĀ in response to a biased poll question: āDoctors and hospitals are private todayĀ within Medicare in the U.S. (I know because Iām old enough to be on Medicare) ā and they would remain so under a MedicareĀ for AllĀ system, just asĀ doctors and hospitals are privateĀ today under Canada’s Medicare for All system. Insurance is government-provided; not the healthcare itself.ā
Itās easy to explain why Medicare for All is more cost-effectiveĀ than the corporate-insurance system.Ā Less bureaucracyĀ and wasteful paperwork. No sales commissions. No exorbitant CEO compensation ā averagingĀ $18 million per healthcare CEO last year. No insurance company profits; the ābig 8 health insurersā raked in $7 billion in one quarterĀ last year.
But confusion, not clarity, is the job of TV news ā which is so heavily sponsored by drug and healthcare companies. (Night after night, big pharma is the main sponsor of network newscasts.) And confusion is the job ofĀ industry adsĀ andĀ corporate politiciansĀ likeĀ Biden, who receivesĀ more healthcare industry donationsĀ than any other Democratic candidate.
Thatās why we keep getting partial scores.
Besides the reduction in financial cost, imagine the reduction in human cost ā hardship and anxiety ā if our country joined every other wealthy country in achieving truly universal health coverage.
Which bring us to a partial score on another crisis causing hardship and anxiety today: climate change. The Green New DealĀ proposal in CongressĀ to address the problem, while creating millions of high-paying jobs, has been savaged as ātoo expensiveā ā withĀ Mitch McConnellĀ and RepublicansĀ incessantly invokingĀ aĀ concoctedĀ andĀ ridic
As with Medicare for All, moneyed elites want to omit the other score ā the price tag of sticking with the status quo into a future that Bill McKibben describes as āa modern Dark Ages.ā From science-denying Republicans to solution-denying corporate Democrats who seek a go-slow āmiddle-ground,ā thereās an attempt to downplay the more expensive cost ofĀ denyĀ andĀ delay, including:Ā Ā rising seas and rivers, more damaging hurricanes and floods, worsening droughts and wildfires, buckling bridges and roads, increased air pollution and hospitalizations, premature deaths, crop failures,Ā extinct species, spread of new diseases, intensified migration and more brutal civil wars.
McKibben argues that the Green New Deal ācosts pennies on the dollarā compared to the bleak and costly future predicted by scientists. McKibben, of course, doesnāt sponsor TV news. The fossil fuel industry does.
In a country as wealthy as ours ā when progressive proposals to address the crises of climate, healthcare and social inequality are routinely shot down by corporate politicians and media as ātoo expensiveā ā George Carlinās quip reminds us to demand the other score: the horrific cost of our unequal and unsustainable status quo.
Jeff Cohen was an associate professor of journalism at Ithaca College and founder of the media watch group FAIR. In 2011, he cofounded the online activism group RootsAction.org. He is the author of āCable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media.ā
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate