The US war against Syria was one that people almost stopped. President Obama was unable to get Congress to authorize the war in 2013, but the Pentagon and foreign policy establishment, who have long wanted to control Syria, pushed forward with war anyway.
It has been a disaster. TheĀ war has resulted inĀ hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries as well six million people displaced within the country and five million people who have fled the country.
The people were right, and the military was wrong. The war on Syria never should have happened and now must end.
President Trump announced withdrawal from Syria this week. This creates an opportunity to end the war on Syria. We have work to do to make peace a reality.
The People Almost Prevented the USĀ War in Syria
In 2013, amidst highly-doubted,Ā unproven allegations of aĀ chemical attack by Syrian President Assad (debunked a year later), the threat of war escalated, and so did opposition to the war. Protests against an attack on Syria took place around the world. In the US, people wereĀ in the streets and speaking out at town halls. Obama was forced to bring the issue to Congress for authorization.
Congress was barraged with aĀ Peace Insurrection encamped outside its doors, sit-insĀ in Congressional offices, and a massive number ofĀ phone calls with 499 to 1 opposing the war.Ā Obama could not get the votes to support the war.Ā Harry Reid surrendered to the public by never holding a vote.
The other superpower, the people, had stopped a war.Ā Obama became the first president to announce a bombing campaign who was forced to back down by the people.
ButĀ the victory would be temporary, neocons and militarists continued to push for war. Based on new fake terror fears, andĀ false chemical attack allegations, the āhumanitarianā destruction of Syria proceeded.
WSWS described how the war escalated under Obama,Ā writing, āThe illegal US occupation of Syria, begun under the Obama administration in October 2015 without authorization from either the United Nations or the Syrian government.ā There was a shift from CIA support for Al Qaeda-linked militias to war to bring down the Assad government. US troops coordinated a campaign of airstrikes that reduced the city of Raqqa and other Syrian communities to rubble. Amnesty International, after conducting field investigations, reportedĀ the US has committed war crimes in Syria. Vijay Prashad described the US creating āhell on Earthā in Syria.
Despite this, the US was losing the war in Syria. With Russia coming to the aid of its ally, Assad was not going to be removed.
Trump escalated andĀ drove the US deeper into the Middle East quagmireĀ betraying the non-interventionist base who elected him. The corporate media praised TrumpĀ as ābecoming presidentā for bombing SyriaĀ based on another unproven chemical attack. Later,Ā even GeneralĀ Mattis admittedĀ there was no evidence tying Assad to chemical attacks.
Early this year, the Trump administration was announcedĀ a permanent presence in one-third of Syria withĀ 30,000 Syrian Kurds as the ground forces, US air support, and eight new US bases. Protests continued against the bombing of Syria throughout the spring in the US and around the world.
Now, as Andre Vltchek describes, the Syrian people have prevailed and most of the country is liberated. People are returning and rebuilding.
Trump Announces Withdrawal
President Trumpās announcement that he is withdrawing from SyriaĀ over the next 60 to 100 daysĀ has been met with a firestorm of opposition. Trump tweeted onĀ Wednesday, āWe have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump Presidency.ā
Russia isĀ drawing down its military activities withĀ Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu reporting Russia was carrying out 100 to 110 flights per day at its peak and now they do no more than two to four flights per week, chiefly for reconnaissance purposes. Putin agreed that ISIS had been defeated and supported Trumpās decision but cast doubt on Washingtonās plans, saying, āWe donāt see any signs of withdrawing US troops yet, but I concede that it is possible.ā
There has been very little support for withdrawal from elected officials. ManyĀ Republicans and the corporate media are criticizing Trump.Ā The first two Democrats to stepĀ forward to support the removal of troops wereĀ Rep. Ted Lieu, a frequent Trump critic who applaudedĀ the action, and Rep. Ro Khanna. But, the bi-partisan war Congress opposes Trump.
Secretary of Defense Mattis resigned after Trumpās announcement. In his resignation, he expressed disagreements with Trump over foreign policy. The media is mourning the exit of Mattis, neglecting his history as a likely war criminal who targeted civilians. Ray McGovern reminds usĀ Mattis was famous forĀ quipping, āItās fun to shoot some people.ā
Mattis is the fourth of āMy Generals,ā as Trump called them, to leave the administration, e.g.Ā Director of Homeland Security and then Chief of Staff, John Kelly, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, and National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. This leaves neocon extremist John Bolton and pro-militarist Mike Pompeo as the biggest influences on Trumpās foreign policy.
Popular Resistance supports the withdrawal of troops from Syria and applauds Trumpās decision.
We are not alone in supporting Trumpās withdrawal announcement. Medea Benjamin of CODE PINK described the withdrawal as āa positive contribution to the peace process,ā urgingĀ āall foreign powers that have been involved in Syriaās destruction, including the United States, take responsibility for rebuilding this nation and providing assistance to the Syrian people, including the refugees, who have suffered so tragically for over seven years.ā
Veterans for Peace supports the withdrawal saying the US has āno legal right to be [there] in the first placeā and describing the brutal destruction caused by US bombs.
Black Alliance for Peace supports the withdrawal writingĀ the war āshould have never been allowed in the first place.ā They denounce the corporate press and members of the political duopoly for opposing the withdrawal. BAP also recognizes that the foreign policy establishment will fight this withdrawal and promises to work to end all US involvement in Syria and other nations.
Will the Long History Of US Regime Change In Syria End?
Trump is being fought because theĀ US has a long history of trying to control Syria dating back to the 1940s. Controlling Syria has been a consistent policy objective.Ā CIA documents from 1986 describe how the US could remove the Assad family.
While the bulk of destruction of Syria occurred during the Obama administration, plans for the current war and overthrowing Assad date back to the George W. Bush administration. A State Department cable,Ā āInfluencing the SARG In The End Of 2006ā, examines strategies to bring about regime change in Syria.
This is not the first time President Trump said the war on Syria would be ending. He did so in March, but in April, Mattis announced expanding the US military in Syria. As Patrick Lawrence writes inĀ Donāt Hold Your Breath on US Troop Withdrawal from Syria,Ā āBy September the Pentagon was sayingĀ . . .U.S. forces had to stay until Damascus and its political opponents achieved a full settlement.ā
In response to Trumpās newest announcement,Ā the Pentagon said it will continue the air war in Syria.Ā They would do so at least for as long as troops were on the ground, adding āAs for anything post-US troops on the ground, we will not speculate on future operations.āĀ The Pentagon has not given any details on a withdrawal timeline, citing āforce protection and operational security reasons.ā
As Trumpās removal of US troops from Syria challenges the foreign policy establishment, which seemed to be planning a long-term presence in Syria, theĀ movement must support Trump to end the war.
The People Must Ensure the End of the War on Syria
The peace movement should do all it can to support Trumpā call for withdrawal because he needs allies. Patrick Lawrence describes the experience thus far during the Trump administration:
āAs Trump finishes his second year in office, the pattern is plain: This president can have all the foreign policy ideas he wants, but the Pentagon, State, the intelligence apparatus, and the rest of what some call āthe deep stateā will either reverse, delay, or never implement any policy not to its liking.ā
We saw this scenario play out earlier this month whenĀ Trump complained about the Pentagonās out-of-control budget and pledged to cut it. As Lawrence points out, just days later the president met with Mattis and the chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services Committee and announced that the three had agreed on a 2020 defense budget of $750 billion, a 5 percent increase.
Trump has made no progress on North Korea since the first meeting and has been prevented from making progress on positive relations with Russia. The foreign policy establishment of the Pentagon, State Department, Intelligence Agencies, weapons makers and Congressional hawks are in control. Trump will need all the help he can get to overcome them and withdraw from Syria.
We should urge Trump to be clear that ALL troops are leaving Syria.Ā This should include not only the troops on the ground but the air force as well as private contractors. The CIA should also stop its secret war on Syria. And the US should leaveĀ the military bases it has built in Syria.Ā Similarly, the movement should support Trumpās calls to withdraw from Afghanistan.
The US has done incredible damage to Syria and owes restitution, which is needed to help bring Syria back to normalcy.
Syria and Afghanistan join the list of failed and counterproductive US wars. These are more signs of a failing empire. The people of the United States must rise up to finish the job we started in 2013 ā stop the war on Syria, a war that never should have occurred.
Please Help ZNet and Z Magazine
Due to problems with our programming that we have only now finally been able to fix, it has been over a year since our last fund raising. As a result, we need your help more than ever toĀ continue to bring the alternative information you have been looking for for 30 years.
Z offers the most useful societal news we can, but in judging what is useful, unlike many other sources we emphasize vision, strategy, and activist relevance. When we address Trump, for example, it is to find ways beyond Trump, not to merely repeat, over and over, how terrible he is. And the same is true for our addressing global warming, poverty, inequality, racism, sexism, and war making. Our priority is always that what we provide has potential for aiding determining what to do, and how best to do it.
In fixing our programming problems, we have updated our system to make becoming a sustainer and giving donations easier. It has been a long process but we are hopeful it will make it more convenient for everyone to help us grow. If you have any trouble, please let us know right away. We need input on any problems to make sure the system can continue to be easy to use for everyone.
The best way to help, however, is to become a monthly or annual sustainer. Sustainers can comment, post blogs, and receive a nightly commentary by direct email.
You can also or alternatively make a one-time donation or get a print subscription to Z Magazine.
Subscribe to Z Magazine here.
Any aid will help greatly. And please email any suggestions for improvements, comments, or problems right away.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate