Business Mogul, reality TV star, and presidential candidate, Donald Trump recently mocked Serge Kovaleski, a New York Times investigative reporter with a disability, at a rally in South Carolina. This contemptuous reference to Kovaleski’s physical disability was morally odious and painful to observe, but not to comprehend, at least not politically. Trump is a hate-monger, and spreads his message without apology in almost every public encounter in which he finds himself.
Some reporters claim he stepped over the line with this act of reprehensible cruelty. That is only partly true. In this loathsome instance, he just expanded his hate-filled discourse, making clear his embrace of a politics founded on arrogance, cynicism, unchecked wealth, and a deeply ingrained racism. In actuality, he stepped over the line the moment he announced his candidacy for the presidency and called Mexican immigrants violent rapists, gang members, and drug dealers. Or for that matter when he called, along with other right-wing extremists, to put refugees in detention centers and create a data base for them. These comments sound eerily close to SS (SS chief) Heinrich Himmler’s call for camps that held prisoners under orders of what euphemistically called “protective custody. To quote the Holocaust Encyclopedia:
In the earliest years of the Third Reich, various central, regional, and local authorities in Germany established concentration camps to detain political opponents of the regime, including German Communists, Socialists, trade unionists, and others from left and liberal political circles. In the spring of 1933, the SS established Dachau concentration camp, which came to serve as a model for an expanding and centralized concentration camp system under SS management.
What is truly sad, dangerous, and even cowardly is how few people along with the corporate media and his intellectual defenders recognize that Trump is symptomatic of the brutal seeds of totalitarianism now being cultivated in American society. Donald Trump represents more than the anti-democratic practices and antics of Joe McCarthy.[1]
On the contrary, he signifies how totalitarianism can mutate and take different forms in specific historical moments. Rather than being dismisses as a wild-card in American politics, it is crucial to recognize that Trump’s popularity represents a dangerous “political space…in both the wider culture and in recent history.”[2] This is evident not only in his race baiting, but in his increasing support for violence against protesters at his rallies, and his call to “make American great again” by any means necessary, none of which is new to American society.
What is new is the degree to which this endorsement of violence, racism, and the call to violate civil liberties are expressed so visibly and without apology. How else to explain the muted criticisms, if not almost non-existent public and media response, to his comments that: “we’re going to have to do things that we never did before. And some people are going to be upset about it, but I think that now everybody is feeling that security is going to rule… And so we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago…”[3] This call to do “the unthinkable” is a fundamental principle of any notion of totalitarianism, regardless of the form it takes.
For instance, Trump’s recent call to bring back waterboarding and to support a torture regime far exceeds what might be called an act of stupidity or ignorance. Torture in this instance becomes a means of exacting revenge on those considered “Other,” un-American, and inferior—principally Muslims, immigrants, and members of the Black Lives Matter Movement. We have heard this discourse before in the totalitarian regimes of the 1930s and later in the dictatorships in Latin America in the 1970s. Heather Digby Parton is right when she writes that Donald Trump “may be the first openly fascistic frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination but the ground was prepared and the seeds of his success sowed over the course of many years. We’ve had fascism flowing through the American political bloodstream for quite some time.”[4]
This is a discourse that betrays dark and dangerous secrets not simply about Trump, but more importantly about the state of American culture and politics. Trump’s brutal racism, cruelty, and Nazi-style policy recommendations are more than shocking, they are emblematic of totalitarianism’s hatred of liberalism, its call for racial purity, its mythic celebration of nationalism, its embrace of violence, its disdain for weakness, and its anti-intellectualism. This is the discourse of total terror. These elements of totalitarianism have become the new American normal. The conditions that produced the torture chambers, intolerable violence, extermination camps, squelching of dissent are still with us. Totalitarianism is not simply a relic of the past. It lives on in new forms and it is just as terrifying and dangerous today as it was in the past.[5]
Trump is not just a fool or an idiot, or ethically dead, he is symptomatic of a long line of fascists who shut down public debate, attempt to humiliate their opponents, endorse violence as a response to dissent, and criticize any public display of democratic principles. America has reached its endpoint with Trump, and his presence should be viewed as a stern warning of the nightmare to come. This is not the discourse of Kafka, but of those extremists who have become cheerleaders for totalitarianism.
Trump is not a straight talker as some writers have claimed, he is a monster without a conscience, a politician with a toxic set of policies. He is the product of a form of finance capitalism and a long legacy of racism and violence in which conscience is put to sleep, democracy withers, and public values are extinguished. This is truly a time of monsters and Trump is simply the most visible and certainly one of the most despicable.
Totalitarianism destroys everything that makes politics possible. It is both an ideological poison and a brutal mode of governance and control. It puts reason to sleep and destroys and viable elements of democracy. Trump reminds us in the most exacerbated and dramatic forms of totalitarianism’s addiction to tyranny, its attachments to the machineries of death, and its moral emptiness.
What is crucial to acknowledge is that the stories, legacies, and violence that are part of totalitarianism’s history must be told over and over again so that it becomes possible to recognize how it appears in new forms, replicated under the banner of terror and insecurity by design, and endlessly legitimated by in the image making of the corporate disimagination machines.
Dark times are here but history is open and Trump’s presence—along with his fellow extremists and supporters– should be a rallying cry for a struggle not simply against a crude and reactionary popularism, but against the tyranny of totalitarianism in its new and offensive forms.
Notes.
[1] John Kiriakou, “Donald Trump and the Legacy of Joe McCarthy,” Reader Supported News, [November 15, 2015]. Online: http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/33687-focus-donald-trump-and-the-legacy-of-joe-mccarthy
[2] Victor Wallis, “The Trump Phenomenon,” Monthly Review, [November 25, 2015]
Online: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2015/wallis251115.html
[3] Zaid Jilani , “Donald Trump Won’t Rule Out Special ID Cards For Muslim Americans,”
AlterNet (November 19, 2015). Online:http://www.alternet.org/donald-trump-wont-rule-out-special-id-cards-muslim-americans
[4] Heather Digby Parton, “The Unprecedented Nightmare of Donald Trump: He’s Actually a Fascist,” Alter Net, [November 25, 2015]. Online: http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/unprecedented-nightmare-donald-trump-hes-actually-fascist
[5] See, especially, Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York: 2001).
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
1 Comment
But the good thing about Don is that he says it all out in the open, so “we” can all appreciate what an arsehole he truly is. He doesn’t couch it in well mannered language. He’s not hiding behind some private tyranny, capitalist, CEO facade.
Totalitarianism is all over the US, and the world, in the guise of private tyrannies (corporations). The very places most of us spend most of our time. Not one state tyranny, like the Soviet Union was, but many private tyrannies. Better that way. It’s not so obvious. So most of us just go about our business and believe that democracy happens on a Sunday, in the market place, exercising our freedom of choice, as Takis Fotopoulos believes. Shit, how did I get there, to Takis Fotopoulos?
At least the Trumpster brings the batons out into the open so we can see ’em. Yeah, he’s an idiot, but an old fashioned totalitarian one.
The brutal seeds of totalitarianism were sown long long ago, in foreign lands, transplanted across the atlantic, and then just dressed up in nice well mannered clothing by the founding fathers, who so many of you Yanks love to regurgitate, again and again. As if America lost its way somewhere along the line and “we” gotta find it again! Even Gar Alperovitz and Gus Speth, co-chairs of the Next System Project, invoke this shit sometimes. Give me a break. Lost its way?
What, the Philippines, Cuba, Haiti and everywhere else in the US’s backyard (just the twentieth century) , WW1 and the Creel Committee, Ed Bernays, Lippmann and co, Roosevelt’s Green New Deal to lull everyone into a false sense that elites and their security division, the State, really care. Post WW2 Keynesian economics as if that caring was being extended (could be good to remember Mossedgh and Vietnam during the mid fifties) right up until the early to mid seventies when the Big Daddy White Geezer Power Grid decided enough of this being nice shit, and put the foot down.
Don is merely one recipient of the riches to be gained by the BDWGPG’s (Big Daddy White Geezer Power Grid) decision to kick the shit out of the bewildered herd while they are down. Or is that the collective “we”.
No, totalitarianism is the norm. It’s the Don coming out so openly about it that is odd. But not really, it gives the rulers of the universe a chance to look like they care again. “Look, Don’s really not that bad a bloke. I agree, he goes too far and shit with all that racist stuff and could pull his head in at times but essentially he has some good ideas. Most of us here, in the ruling class, are good caring people and Donny would do well to keep his mouth shut, because he makes the rest of us look bad. And really, we’re not!”
If Sanders wants to be taken seriously with some sort of socialism, a counter to Don’s overt totalitarianism, he has to be as equally overt, and not water down the definition, but ramp it up to radical revolutionary proportions, then be willing to lose, and continue the fight outside the electoral system, with all those real revolutionaries, where ever they are. What are the odds?
Shit, I’m starting to sound like Joey Val.