According to Sinclair Broadcasting Group, it’s doing a service to its viewers by requiring the many local TV news stations it owns to airĀ unabashedly pro-Trump propagandaĀ on a regular basis.
TheĀ local TV news giantĀ has been pushing a right-wing slant on local television stations across the countryĀ for years. Owned byĀ the Smiths, aĀ family of longtime Republican donorsĀ who have all the ambition of News Corp.ās Rupert Murdoch but a much lower profile, Sinclair has mostly flown under the radar. But following the election of President Donald Trump, the network has begunĀ adopting the playbookĀ Roger Ailes used to turn Fox News into a conservative media goliath.
Over the last few months, Sinclair has been requiring its stations to run more commentaries from pro-Trump personalities and expanding its reach to greater numbers of unassuming viewers in new local media markets. Now it’s defending these clear moves to mimic theĀ aspiring state mediaĀ overĀ at Fox with warped, brainwash-y logic: The conservative propaganda it pushes on its viewers is necessary because the rest of the media is biased.
Politicoās Hadas GoldĀ obtainedĀ aĀ new internal memoĀ from Sinclair executive Scott LivingstonĀ declaring that much of the recent reporting about Sinclairās moves to expand right-wing local news is āfalse.ā
In the memo, Livingston said the networkās right-wing commentary segments āprovide a viewpoint that often gets lost in the typical national broadcast media dialogue.ā His memo closed with an attempt to cast recent criticism of Sinclair asĀ illegitimateĀ and perpetrated by “biased” reporters seeking to “destroy our reputation.” On and off-screen, it’s Sinclair vs. the world:
“What we find most troubling in the reporting about our company, by major media outlets (like the New York Times and Washington Post), is the omission of key facts in their stories,ā Livingston wrote. “Such omissions suggest the existence of either journalistic incompetency or editorial bias. We do not believe these journalists are incompetent, so we are left to conclude that they are biased.
“We are proud to offer a range of perspectives, both conservative and liberal — to our consumers — -on our Sinclair broadcast stations each day. It is unfortunate that so many of our competitors do not provide the same marketplace of ideas,ā he continued. “Our commitment is to tracking the truth, providing context and perspective in our reporting and serving our communities with valuable and, at times, life-saving information. We value our viewers and our journalists who work hard each day to serve the communities in which they live — -all across this great country. Itās concerning and troubling that so many once trusted news organizations continue to push false narratives with an agenda to destroy our reputation and discredit the great journalism across our company.ā
Like Ailes before him, Livingston hopes that he can garner ratings by presenting his network as āfair and balancedā in opposition to the mainstream press. But here are the undeniable, troubling facts aboutĀ the direction Sinclair is taking:
- Months after hiring former Trump aide Boris Epshteyn as its chief political analyst, SinclairĀ announcedĀ it would be increasing the number of times per week that Epshteynās right-wing commentary segment, āBottom Line with Boris,ā mustĀ air on its local stations. Media critic David Zurawik hasĀ describedĀ these segments as āas close to classic propaganda as I think I have seenā over his 30-year career.
- āBottom Line with Borisā is one of three regular Sinclair segments considered to be āmust runā content, meaning that all Sinclair stations are required to air them. The other two segments are āBehind the Headlinesā with conservative commentator Mark Hyman and a fearmongering āterrorism alert desk.ā The practice has raised concerns fromĀ expertsĀ andĀ employeesĀ atĀ local Sinclair stations.
- Sinclair isĀ currently seekingĀ to acquire Tribune Media forĀ $3.9 billion, aĀ moveĀ that would make Sinclair theĀ largest provider of local television news in the country. The potential acquisition, by the way, isĀ possible onlyĀ because of a Trump administration move to roll back Obama-era consumer regulations.
Itās clear that Sinclair is attempting to push an increasingly skewed view of the news to an ever-expanding audience inĀ regions across the country. And thisĀ isnāt Livingstonās first time lashing out at non-Sinclair outlets. Back in March, LivingstonĀ set this toneĀ by narrating a strange āmust runāĀ segmentĀ warning viewers about ābiased and false newsā from āmembers of the national media.ā
The āmust runā segments are not just run-of-the-mill conservative ācommentaryā
While Livingston is trying to pass off the must-run segments as merely conservative commentary, thereās no doubt that the Epshteyn and Hyman segments are straight-up propaganda. In recent weeks,Ā neithercommentatorĀ seems to have aired a segment touching on possible collusion between members of the Trump camp and Russia, despite frequent bombshells on the top story. (In June, Hyman’sĀ takeĀ on Russian meddling in the election was: “We do it. Russians do it. Everyone does it. Meddling in another nation’s democratic elections is actually routine behavior.”) Theyāve also had little to say about the dangerously inept Republican effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, a major news story and a Trump administration priority gone wrong. (Epshteynās most recent segment, as of publication, is aĀ confused critique of net neutrality. Hymanās is about why raising theĀ minimum wageĀ in Seattle is bad.)
At its very worst, the Sinclair āmust runā strategy also attempts to drive a wedge between local audiences and the facts. Both Epshteyn and Hyman have found time toĀ produceĀ severalĀ segmentsĀ eachĀ since Trumpās inauguration attacking mainstream media outlets in a direct echo of both their employerās rhetoric andĀ Trump administration talking points. Epshteyn evenĀ cheeredĀ Trumpās threat to scale back White House press briefings last month, calling the briefings āa circus and a distraction.ā
And at its very, very worst, Sinclair is sneaking the very lowest in fringe, far-right commentary into the living rooms of unsuspecting Americans who did not sign up for it. The most devastating example is this must-runĀ segmentĀ from April, in which Mark Hyman alludes to theĀ heinous far-right conspiracy theoryĀ about the death of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
The Hyman and Epshteyn segments are doing the dirty work of pushing Sinclairās openly pro-Trump agenda and anti-media propaganda efforts to unknowing local television viewers on the regular.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate