Among the suggestions I would have made to the Yale philosophy professor Jason Stanley had I been an editor of his important book How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (Random House, 2018), two seem particularly relevant in the present political juncture.
Inauthentic Democracy
The first suggestion would have been for Stanley to explicitly call out the state-capitalist and corporate-captive Democratic Party in his perceptive discussion of how the fascist-style 2016 U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump got to come off as more āauthenticā than his major party opponent while habitually telling untruths and āgiving voice to shocking sentiments that were presumed to be unsuitable for public discourse.ā
As Stanley rightly pointed out, Democratic candidates āmust raise huge sums to run for officeā¦As a result, they represent the interests of their large donors. However, because it is a democracy, they must also try to make the case that they represent the common interest. They must pretend that the best interests of the multinational corporations that fund their campaigns are also the common interest.ā
Iām not sure why Stanley thought the United States is āa democracyā (it is no such thing), but he put his thumb on a basic and longstanding conundrum in bourgeois politics. Compared with the fake-progressivism and pretend populism that results from the plutocratic contradictions (hardly restricted just to campaign finance matters) that plague liberal and social-democratic politicos under capitalism within and beyond the U.S., the openly racist and sexist ruling-class thug from Queens Donald Trump āwas taken for speaking his mind,ā exhibiting āclassic demagogic behaviorā that ācame to be seen as the more authentic candidate, even when he is manifestly dishonestā (Stanley, p. 72). Thatās a good and important point, relevant to our understanding neofascist political success beyond as well as within the U.S.
I thought back to Stanleyās book when I read this in a recent Salon interview with the legendary liberal investigative journalist Seymour Hersh:
Chauncey DeVega (Salon): āYou have studied and written about some of the most powerful people in America and the world. What do you want the American people to know about their behavior and character as a group?ā
Seymour Hersh: āI think itās inevitable that you donāt get truth-tellers. I want the American people to stop believing everything they hear and to ask more questions, to become more skeptical. I think itās the one reason a guy like Donald Trump won. They understood where he was coming from. That Trump is just a blowhard. They laughed at him. They knew Trump doesnāt know what heās talking about. But Trump wasnāt the same old big smile and a lot of good words. The Democrats have been going around saying, āWeāre for the people, weāre for the little guy.ā And all they do is run to Wall Street for money. And the one guy that didnāt, Sanders, was sabotaged by the Democratic National Committee.ā
But this is nothing remotely new. Yes, Virginia, the Democrats have an authenticity problem, you betchya. The late left Princeton political scientist Sheldon Wolin memorably labeled the Democrats as, get this, āthe Inauthentic Oppositionā twelve years ago. āShould Democrats somehow be elected,āĀ Wolin prophesiedĀ in his book Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (Princeton, 2007), they would do nothing to āalter significantly the direction of societyā or āsubstantially revers[e] the drift rightwards. ⦠The timidity of a Democratic Party mesmerized by centrist precepts,ā Wolin wrote, āpoints to the crucial fact that for the poor, minorities, the working class and anti-corporatists there is no opposition party working on their behalf.ā The corporatist Democrats would work to āmarginalize any possible threat to the corporate allies of the Republicans.ā
Wolin called it. A nominal Democrat was elected president along with Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress in 2008. What followedĀ under Barack ObamaĀ (as under his Democratic presidential predecessorĀ Bill Clinton) was theĀ standard āeliteā neoliberal manipulation of campaign populism and identity politicsĀ in service to the reigning big-money bankrollers and their global empire. Wall Streetās control of Washington and the related imperial agenda of the Pentagon System were advanced more effectively by the nationās first Black president than they could have been by stiff and wealthy white Republicans like John McCain or Mitt Romney. The reigning U.S. system of corporate and imperial āinverted totalitarianismā (Wolin) was given a deadly, fake-democratic re-branding.Ā The underlying ādrift rightwardsā sharpened, fed by a widespread and easily Republican-exploited sense of popular abandonment and betrayal, as the hypocritical and inauthentic dollar Democrats depressed and demobilized their own purported popular base.
Hillary Clinton did nothing to correct that problem in 2016.Ā Quite the opposite. With a colossal campaign finance war-chest fed not just by the usual Wall Street and Silicon Valley suspects butĀ also by many traditionally Republican big money donorsĀ who were repelled by Trumpās faux āpopulism,ā the transparently corporate establishmentarian candidate Clinton could barely deign to pretend to be a progressive.Ā She ran almost completely on the argument that Trump was too terrible and unqualified to be president. Making candidate character and qualities her sole selling point was a critical and historic mistake given the angry and anti-establishment mood of the electorate and her own epic unpopularity. So was calling TrumpāsĀ flyover countyĀ supporters a ābasket ofā racist and sexist ādeplorablesā in a sneering comment (one thatĀ accurately reflectedĀ her aristocraticĀ āprogressiveā-neoliberalĀ world view) to rich Manhattan campaign donors.
The Democrats would have won the 2016 election and overcome some of their authenticity problem by running Bernie Sanders, āthe one guy that didnāt run to Wall Street for moneyā (Hersh). In something of a tantalizing anomaly for professor Stanleyās rule, Sanders āraise[d] huge sumsā but did so from working- and middle-class small-donors (see the remarkable work of Thomas Ferguson and his colleagues on this) and didnāt ārepresent the interests ofā¦large donorsā or āpretend that the bests interests of the multinational corporationsā were āalso the common interest.ā Quite the opposite.
Sanders would have authentically tapped authentic popular anger from the center-left, advancing a policy agenda and anti-plutocratic sentiments consistent with longstanding majority-progressive public opinion in the U.S.
It would have been a winning formula in an anti-establishment election. But so what? The Democratic nomination process was rigged against Sanders for some very good ruling-class reasons. As William Kaufman told Barbara Ehrenreich on Facebook two years ago, āThe Democrats arenāt feckless, inept, or stupid, unable to ālearnā what it takes to win. They are corrupt. They do not want to win with an authentically progressive program because it would threaten the economic interests of their main corporate donor base⦠The Democrats know exactly what theyāre doing.Ā They have a business model: sub-serving the interests of the corporate elite.ā
The reigning corporate Democrats would rather lose to the right, even to a proto-fascistic white nationalist and eco-exterminist right, than lose to the left, even to a mildly progressive social democratic and environmentalist left within their own party.
How else explain their insistence on promoting the ridiculous, right-wing arch-corporatist, imperialist, and dementia-plagued right-wing gaffe machine Joke Biden in the long march to the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries? Again and again, the Democratsā main cable news networks CNN and MSDNC falsely and insidiously describe Sandersā highly popular, majority-backed Single Payer health insurance policy plank as an authoritarian big government assault on peopleās existing coverage instead of a great democratic human rights demand. The āliberalā media perversely portrays the fiscally viable and existentially necessary Green New Deal as a far-out and dreamy radical scheme from another galaxy. When theyāre not just completely ignoring him and his large rallies (probably the main way they undermine Sanders), the corporate media even stoops to painting out Sanders as another version of Trump: old, authoritarian, stubborn, male, and boorish.
But this is timeworn standard operating procedure in the Democratic Party and its allied media, leading agents in what the prolific leading left scholar Henry Giroux calls āneoliberal fascism.ā Itās a richly bipartisan disease. In Girouxās book American Nightmare: Facing the Challenge of Fascism (City Lights, 2018), one sees none of Stanleyās hesitation or reluctance when it comes to forthrightly acknowledging and exposing the central roles of the Democrats and the capitalist order in the creation of the neofascist menace that haunts the United States today.
Fascism Needs a Socialist Menace
My second suggestion to Stanley would have been to include anti-socialism as one of his top, chapter-worthy lynchpins of fascist ideology [1]. Historical fascism was first and above all an organized assault on working class resistance and the socialist Left ā an assault that was embraced by the reigning Italian and German capitalist classes in the name of stopping Marxism, socialism, Bolshevism, and communism. Anti-socialism remains so fundamental to fascist politics and ideology that contemporary neofascist politicos like Trump, Mitch McConnell, Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller, Wayne LaPierre, and Sean Hannity feel the need to concoct a socialist menace where very little if any real radical Left exists. In the United States, we have a grand total of three politicians in elected federal office ā Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Rashida Tlaib ā who identify as ādemocratic socialists.ā People who call themselves socialists make up less than one percent of the total Congressional delegation of a (not-so) Democratic Party that is deeply beholden to Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley Chase, Lockheed Martin and the broad ābillionaire classā that Sanders regularly denounces and refuses to take money from. The partyās leaders proudly embrace capitalism and, including Warren, applauded when the Neofascist-in-Chief made his neo-McCarthyite call for Congress to pledge that the United States would ānever be a socialist countryā during his State of the Union Address last winter. And the three self-declared Congressional āsocialistsā arenāt even real socialists. They are progressive Democrats: social-democratish progressive neo-New Dealers trying to add some modest measure of social and environmental decency to late capitalism.
But, well, so what? Orange Skull, āMoscow Mitch,ā Field Marshal Miller, Princess Kellyanne, the National fascist Rifle Association, Herr Hannity, Lieutenant Limbaugh, and the rest of the white nationalist noise machine rail and warn constantly against the āradical Leftā and āsocialistā Democrats. Neofascists need a big socialist Left specter to justify their sickening existence. They need the socialist foil so badly that theyāll invent it even where it barely exists.
Dollar Dem Donny Deutsch(land): āThis Company is Not Denmarkā
Thereās a nauseating irony here. The neofascist project of Donito Assolini and his allies is curiously aided and abetted by a āliberalā media canāt seem to use to the F-word ā fascism (or at least āneo-fascismā or āfascist-styleā) ā when describing the actually fascistic politics of Trump, his party, and his base. But that same media canāt stop using the S-word, socialism, in complaining and warning about the supposed āfar leftā menace in its own party. Listen to the ridiculous retired multi-millionaire advertising executive and current MSDNC Saturday night show-host Donny Deutsch on āMorning Joeā last March :
āI find Donald Trump reprehensible as a human being, but a socialist candidate [Bernie Sanders] is more dangerous to this company, country, as far as the strength and well-being of the country, than Donald Trump.Ā I would vote for Donald Trump, a despicable human beingā¦I will be so distraught to the point that that could even come out of my mouth, if we have a socialist [Democratic presidential candidate in 2020] because that will take our country so down, and we are not Denmark.Ā I love Denmark, but thatās not who we are. And if you love who we are and all the great things that still have to have binders put on the side. Please step away from the socialism.ā
That, to quote paraphrase Happy Gilmoreās one-armed golf instructor, was spoken like a true asshole. Oh yes, Donny Deutsch, what a ruinous nightmare it would be if the worldās richest nation granted all its people quality health care as a human right like they do in Trotskyist Denmark ā and if we started trying to save the human race from extinction by introducing large-scale green jobs programs. Bernie Sanders, he of the essential Green New Deal and Stalinist-Canadian Single Payer, is āmore dangerous to this company, countryā than the fascist Donald Trump. Thatās telling some harsh truths, Donny boy: standing up for your company, country!
To repeat: the establishment Democrats would rather lose to the right, even to a proto-fascistic white-nationalist and eco-exterminist right, than lose to the left, even to a mildly progressive social democratic and environmentalist left within their own party?
Postscript: Some Further Weak-End Reflections
In the meantime, here are twelve further and related political reflections for Counterpunchers to consider this weekend:
#1. How many times have we said, āoh boy this time it has really become unhinged, it has really lost it nowā and then the Trumpenstein doubles down and creates new ānorm-bustingā moments of mind-boggling madness. Round and round it goes, where it stops nobody knows. I got tripped-up this week up by its āI am the Chosen Oneā comment, its āKing of Israelā tweet, its stated interested in ābuying Greenland,ā and its claim to want to ārelease ISIS fighters back into Europeā. I was like, āokay thatās all just too far, it canāt survive saying and tweeting things that insane.ā Who was I kidding? There is no line in the sand. I woke up Thursday and realized that itās just another tricky day in the Scary Clown drain-circling circus of Americaās long farewell tour. The āChosen Oneā line, Anthony DiMaggio writes, āis Christian neofascism at its finest.ā
#2. Las Vegas should start a betting line on whether Trump will leave peacefully if 2020 doesnāt go his way. Unless itās a total epic anti-Dump landslide, I frankly donāt see Tangerine Jackass leaving peacefully. Anything remotely close and he will contest the count. I expect post-election violence from Trumpās ātough guysā ā many of them heavily armed ā on a perhaps shocking scale unless the count goesĀ his way. Heās been setting people up for a refusal to leave from day one, with his opening claims to have been denied a popular vote victory. He has been triggering and cultivating the violence-prone racist and sexist white far-right from day one. Has said and tweeted much that fits my bet from day one. Throw his recent absurd claim that Google stole 2. 6 million votes from him in 2016 into the mix. No doubt many will denounce this is a kooky left conspiracy theory. It is no such thing. Ask his longtime personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen, who warned Congress that Trump will not exit the White House peacefully earlier this year.
#3. Mass shooting deja vu: Fascist Wayne Lapierre, head of the fascist and terrorist NRA, called the āMidtown Mussoliniā (Eric Draitsterās excellent phrase for Trump) and so now (as widely predicted) even tepid background checks ā irrelevantly supported by more than 8 in U.S.-Americans (a significant majority of whom also irrelevantly support an assault weapons ban) ā are off the table. Sound familiar? Itās just like after Parkland. The Washington Post reports that the lifespan of popular outrage over grisly mass shootings like Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, Parkland, and El Paso (and so many more) is about three weeks. The NRA and the GOP just have to wait the outrage out for 21 days. Talk about mental health and say that even background checks are a āslippery slopeā (Trump used that term last Wednesday) leading to the complete abrogation of āSecond Amendment rights.ā Meanwhile, white-nationalist psychos and other freaks are cleaning and oiling their assault weapons in the race to the next big kill. Spin the Wheel of Death on when and where the next major bloodbath occurs. Speaking of Vegas (home to the record-setting mass shooting death total), whatās the over-under on how many days? Itās not about if; itās just about when and where. This is the carnage and barbarism that white-nationalist gun-mad Amerikaners have made in idiotic Kay Bailey Hutchinsonās ābeacon to the world of the way life should be.ā
#4. The Evil Pile of Fascist Crap wants Internment Camps. Evil Pileās new rule, issued on Wednesday, unilaterally abrogating the Flores settlement agreement points in precisely that direction. The rule may well be shot down in court, but everyone needs to understand that Evil Pile and his enablers want to construct a network of for-profit internment camps that will detain migrant families for an indefinite period.
#5. Not being Jewish religiously or ethnoculturally, I can only imagine how Jewish people (who have tended toward the liberal and left side of the American spectrum on the whole), must have felt when they heard the big goyish dumpster-fire from Queens telling them they are traitors to their own ethno-cultural and religious group/identity unless they vote Republican. How insanely surreal. The lecture comes from a POTUS who has clearly cultivated support from neo-Nazis and other anti-Semites.
#6. I need politicos and talking heads to stop calling the President of the United States āour commander-in-chief.ā While rightly denouncing the Scary fascist Clownās Trumpās insane comments on American Jewsā voting behavior on CNN last Wednesday, the head of the Anti-Defamation League referred to Trump as āour commander-in-chie.ā (CIC). No, please stand down. Are U.S. citizens all enlisted in the U.S. military? No, they are not. The POTUS is the CIC of the military, not the whole population. Read the Constitution. This is so basic, Civics 101.
#7. Beyond insanity and narcissism, the thread connecting all Scary Clownās shit together is white-lash neofascism. I am intrigued that they just canāt seem to say this on MSDNC. The reflexive kowtowing to the fascist NRA no matter how many disproportionately black and brown bodies fall to bullets shot from military-style weapons in post-ācivil society.ā The racist internment camps. The āshit-hole nationā comments. The refusal to respond properly to Puerto Ricoās hurricane disaster. The assault on the āSquad,ā telling four progressive congresswomen of color to āgo back to the crime-ridden countries you came from. The sadistic torture of migrant children. The obsession with winning and looking strong. The shaming of strong women. The promotion of a cult of personality around himself. The constant assault on the media as āenemies of the people.ā The violence-promoting and hate-filled rallies. The threat of violence if he is removed from office. The mocking of Asians. The mocking of disabled people. Saying āthe Blacks love me.ā The attacks on Cummings and Baltimore and Chicago. The constant slandering of Latinx immigrants and asylum-seekers as an āinvasionā and āinfestation.ā The pig Slovenian wife with the fascist āI Donāt Care Do U?ā jacket. The national emergency end-run around Congressional Wall funding. The insane Wall. The threats to unleash thermonuclear āfire and fury.ā The continuing absurd claim to have won the 2016 popular vote and been cheated out of it by illegal immigrants and minority vote fraud. The threat of violence from ātough peopleā ā bikers, soldiers, cops, and (though not explicitly mentioned) white-supremacist militias ā if he is removed from office. The triggering and defense of violent white-nationalist psycho-killers. The absurd threat to call Antifa a āterrorist organizationā while staying silent on openly fascist white-supremacists and even suggesting Nazis and KKKers include āsome very fine people.ā The advance pardon of fascist Sheriff Arpaio. The constant references to the center-right corporate-neoliberal Democratic Party as āradical Leftā and āsocialist.ā Even the recent Greenland-Denmark madness (fascists love to acquire territory). I could go on. It may be a malignantly narcissist lunatic and idiot, but it is also a white-nationalist neofascist.
#8. Evil Pileās special word for women who reject Evil Pileās noxious idiocy: āNASTY.ā Evil Pileās special word for men who reject his noxious idiocy: WEAK.
#9. Jill Biden should be ashamed of herself. āYour candidate might be better,ā Dr. Jill recently lectured voters, āon, I donāt know, healthcare than Joe is but youāve got to look at whoās going to win this election, and maybe you have to swallow a little bit and say, āOkay, I personally like so and so better,ā but your bottom line has to be that we have to beat Trump.ā There are three problems here: (a) Dr. Jillās dementia-addled jackass of a right-wing husband is an un-electable buffoon; (b) centrist corporate and professional-class scolds like Dr. Jill have been saying this nauseating āLesser Evilistā crap to forever and it is no small part of what has brought us to the brink of fascism. (c) Wanting Single Payer and a Green New Deal is about sentiments that go a lot deeper and wider than āpersonal like[s].ā Itās about basic human decency and averting true environmental catastrophe.
#10. The Obamas made a movie about a Chinese billionaire building a glass factory through their new film company āHigher Ground.ā Iām not kidding. Iām guessing that the documentary, titled āAmerican Factory,ā is meant to be a trumpeting of neoliberal globalism: a Chinese billionaire came in and built an American factory In a āToday Showā interview promoting the film, a remarkably unattractive Barack Obama looked less-than-enthused as he proclaimed that āa good story is a good story.ā āHigher Ground,ā intoned Michelle Obama, āis a reflection of both of us, so that means that, you know, our platform is going to look a little bit like everything, just like the world is a little bit of everything.ā Is it possible to say anything more vapidly meaningless than that? In the Today interview, you could tell by the look on Barack Obamaās face that he really couldnāt give a flying f#*k about this flick and that the whole new film venture is probably just something to appease Michelle. They look deeply disenchanted with (a) their movie; (b) each other; and (c) their vapid neoliberal lives. To paraphrase Herr Donald, itās all very āweak.ā (On the bright side, perhaps the Obamasā movie will cause mass civil unrest, as millions pour into the streets to demand that Chinese billionaires build glass and other kinds of factories in their cities and towns too. The red flag of revolution could be raised as the American working-class demands the investment of surplus Chinese capital in the U.S. heartland.)
#11. If you look at the so-called mainstream (corporate-state) media, itās doctrine that āpoliticsā equals electoral politics centered around the citizenry qua electorate making marks for two minutes once every 2 or 4 years on ballots next to candidate names selected in advance for them by the un-elected dictatorship of money. āThatās politics.ā Itās a childish joke, an infantilizing farce. Listen to the great radical historian Howard Zinn in March of 2008, writing as Barack Von Obombdenburg took over the minds of many who should have known better: āWe have all been brought up to believe that voting is crucial in determining our destiny, that the most important act a citizen can engage in is to go to the polls and choose one of the two mediocrities who have already been chosen for us. It is a multiple choice test so narrow, so specious, that no self-respecting teacher would give it to studentsā¦The very people who should know better, having criticized the hold of the media on the national mind, find themselves transfixed by the press, glued to the television set, as the candidates preen and smile and bring forth a shower of clichĆ©s with a solemnity appropriate for epic poetry.ā āYou had your input,ā our masters tell all us poor little fools. We got it the last time we had our chance to go into a voting booth for two minutes and choose from a narrow roster of āpre-approved, money-vetted candidates.ā Two minutes once every 1,460 or 730 days. If we play along with that insanely narrow, savagely time-staggered definition of popular sovereignty then we deserve everything we get, frankly. Sorry, my fellow āAmericans,ā but you donāt stop tyranny by restricting your politics to such childish little narrow and time-staggered rituals of ruling class legitimation. Thatās, well, weak.
# 12. An interesting question: will MSDNC out-do CNN and FOX in pouring scorn on, or simply ignoring, Bernie Sandersā big Thursday Green New Deal roll-out?
Endnote
1) Stanley devotes separate chapters to ten different strands of fascist ideology and politics: the mythical national and patriarchal past; propaganda; anti-intellectualism; unreality; hierarchy; victimhood, law and order, sexual anxiety, fear of cities; embrace of hard work and hatred of laziness and dependency. He does note some aspects of the anti-Marxism that is ubiquitous in fascist thought: see How Fascism Works, pp. 42-45, 55-56, 89, 171-172, 176.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate