When Lincoln stood up in Congress to protest, he pointed out that the pretext Polk used to declare war (āAmerican blood was shed on American soil!ā) was a lie and set about to prove it with a series of āspot resolutions.ā These essentially consisted of eight examples which challenged the president to show the exact spot where the alleged blood was shed. Lincoln proved conclusively that it was on Mexican soil, and that the Americans were the invaders.
As a result of Lincolnās courageous stance in Congress, he was castigated in the press, called āspotty Lincolnā by his critics, and abandoned by his party and by his supporters. He was accused of giving aid and comfort to the enemy. He lost an election to the Senate and was even turned down for an appointment as postmaster. It seemed like his political career was over. Although many US historians have advanced the theory that Lincoln spoke against the war for political reasons, his subsequent speeches disprove that theory as do his letters to his law partner, William Herndon. He railed against the war a second time a month after his famous āspot resolutionsā over objections of the younger members of his party, and even voted for an amendment condemning the war which was tacked on to a resolution honoring war hero Zachary Taylor, who would become the next president.
When Lincoln finally became president himself as a compromise candidate, one would think he had enough on his plate with the South about to succeed and with a fratricidal war on the horizon. Yet he made time even then to meet with the Mexican Ambassador MatĆas Romero, who visited him at his home in Springfield shortly after the election. Lincoln wrote Romero a letter reassuring him and the new president of Mexico, Benito JuĆ”rez, of his support of the Mexican people and their republic.
By 1863 the US was fully engaged in the Civil War: the Battle of Gettysburg was in full swing, and France had invaded Mexico and set up the puppet emperor, Maximilian. As both Austrian and French troops occupied Mexico, Lincolnācareful not to burn bridges with France lest they unite with the Confederacyāsoft-pedaled his aid to the Mexican government in exile. He had his advisers confer secretly with Romero (now without credentials since President JuĆ”rez was in El Paso), and even met with him personally on several occasions. Mary Todd Lincoln and Romero went on shopping trips together and had intimate conversations. Romero used the Lincoln letter of friendship to approach banks in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, and San Francisco to solicit investors to buy a Mexican bond issue. He was able to raise over $18 million.
As the war came to an end in the east, he was able to circumvent Secretary of State Henry Sewardās cautious approach and help persuade Lincoln to order General Grant to move over 50,000 troops under the command of General Sheridan to the Texas border, including thousands of ācolored troopsā (as the African-American soldiers were known at the time). The goal was to help Mexicans at the end of the US Civil War to drive out the French. Sheridan purposely ālostā 30,000 repeating rifles on the border where the JuĆ”rez army could find them. Although Lincoln would be assassinated shortly after the surrender of Appomattox, his generals continued to help Mexico. They encouraged the recently-discharged troops to form the American Legion of Honor which would fight side by side with the Mexicans, helping rid the country of the last remnants of European occupation.
In 1947, Harry Truman, a Democrat, came to Mexico to reaffirm what a Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, had affirmed throughout his career: the Mexican people are not only our neighbors but the entire southwestern US was formerly their territory. Mexico and the US share today a vast territory in North America and neither side can afford animosity or discord. Americans were the first illegal immigrants to their country, violating their laws, fomenting revolt, and later with our army violating their sovereign territory. It is well to remember that when we are tempted to react with frustration or impatience.
Our later history under Lincoln made us allies, helping to rid Mexico (and us) of an unwelcomed foreign power in this hemisphere. As an American historian, living and teaching in Mexico, it is my hope that this re-visioning of our mutual histories in Abraham Lincoln and Mexico might quiet the polemics raging in the US since the recent election, and let us hear the quieter voices which speak to us from the past about how we might be āgood neighborsā once again.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
2 Comments
Maybe in the distant future if the US is no longer an empire history would be recapitulated and it be recognized that the US was as much of an invading European power as France was. The actions of Abraham Lincoln-losing guns in the border-reflect more in the Monroe Doctrine than anything else, after all he continued the ocuppation of half our territory when there was still a chance to leave it, it had only been thirteen years since the occuppation when he became president, of course it would be too much to ask of any man to be of the stature as the one of Lincoln’s memorial. The result of any war can’t be the secession of half the territory of the defeated even if it was a real war and not a depredatory aggression to abuse a weak nation, underpined by extrem racism . It was an extortion by force to take our land because they coveted it; a racket by a rogue state with terrible long term consecuences not only for the people who had lived there for thousands of years but also for Hawaiians, and Philippines , and decisive to make the US the incongruent ,unilateral, violent militaty superpower that it is today. Mexicans were regarded as Indians , a quasi-nation without rights. For the US the Mexican-US War was just another episode of the Indian wars. All the treaties made with the Indian nations have never been honored. The US is as good as its word , which is null. The Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty guaranteed the citizenship to the mexicans living in the “seceded” terretory, instead they were hunted for their scalps -which were paid cheaper than the Red Indians’-and economically relegated and exploited , this was instituted by law in the Greaser Act. It’s impossible now to release our terretory but the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty could be honored yet. The relation of Mexico with the US is of a complementary economy not as an equal a condition requiered for any friendship.
This harkens back to the time when the Republican Party at least had some principles. In WVA, the Democrat Party is a walking corpse. Yes, many here operate under the illusion of Trump putting the miners
back to work, and similarly, much of the opposition to HILLARY and Obama is driven by noxious talk radio and Fox News. But this is just as much an opportunity as a problem. If Sanders can attempt to revive the New Deal, why not resurrect the party of Radical Reconstruction and anti-intervention. ( See also Thomas Brackett Reed and Robert LaFollette).