The danger with extremism is that, when filtered through eyes and minds of reasonable people, it appears ridiculous. The reasonable assumption is that others will view it through the same filter and find it equally ridiculous. But, while The Reasonable laugh, support for extremist views creeps up. Because what The Reasonable failed to notice is that fear and insecurity have a way of robbing others of reason.
Ukipās manifestoĀ is a collection of promises selected, seemingly, on the basis of ātwenty things that really annoy peopleā, with no inkling of implementation method or any costings; a wish list for The Annoyed.
Scared of immigrants? Vote Ukip.
Insecure about the financial crisis? Vote Ukip.
Hate the smoking ban, HS2, Brussels, travellers, burqas, regulation, tax, Boris, debt, wind farms, quangos, foreign aid, crime, Abu Qatada, tuition fees, lazy people, Muslims, foreigners, the hunting ban? Vote Ukip.
The real danger of Ukip becoming a serious contender for coalition partnership in 2015 is gleefully ignored by the centre-left (because, after all, they are damaging the Tories) and dealt with by the centre-right by shifting closer to their extremes; by copying their policies and rhetoric. Everything from theĀ EU referendum and citizenship testsĀ (pdf) to Theresa Mayās ā and Iām not making this up ā imbecilicĀ tales of cat loving, illegal immigrants.
In other words, not only is nobody challenging their vitriol, but they are being allowed to set the political agenda.
Meanwhile their oleaginous leader,Ā whom the British media have taken to calling ācharismaticā, is invited to appear on every news programme. This is, apparently, in order to provide balance on European matters ā which is like inviting a creationist to give their view every time a story breaks about dinosaur fossils.
This man, who claims he stands alone in wanting to fight for Britainās interests in the Evil EU, and who bemoans the amount of taxpayers’ money going to the aforementioned Evil EU, boasts about having claimed up toĀ£2m in expensesĀ out of said taxpayers’ money and presides over a party three of whose representatives have theĀ worst attendance recordĀ of any British MEPs (who together already have the lowest attendance record of any national delegation). Presumably they are all fighting for Britainās interests remotely from a BBC studio, somewhere.
Most important of all, we are asked to believe ā and this is essential in making Ukip palatable to The Annoyed ā that Ukip is not a party of bigots. That, it may walk like a duck and quack like a duck and be affiliated to other ducks all over Europe, but it is, in fact, a platypus. āI’d rather have a party of eccentrics than bland, ghastly peopleā,Ā says Nigel Farage. Let us examine those eccentrics.
Links with European far-right parties
Ukip is part of the group Europe of Freedom and Democracy (EFD). The group includes representatives of the Danish Peopleās Party, the True Finns Party, the Dutch SGP and the infamous Italian Lega Nord āĀ all of them far-right. Nigel Farage is co-President of the group along with Lega Nordās Francesco Speroni, whoĀ described multiple murderer Anders BreivikĀ as someone whose āideas are in defence of western civilisation.”
Mario Borghezio, another member of the group,Ā declared in a radio interviewĀ that Breivik had some “excellent” ideas. Farageās reaction was towrite a strongly-worded letterĀ to Borghezio, asking him to withdraw his comments or Ukip would pull out of the EFD. Borghezio not only did not apologise, but responded withĀ an extraordinary speechĀ in which he raged: “Long live the Whites of Europe, long live our identity, our ethnicity, our race⦠our blue sky, like the eyes of our women. Blue, in a people who want to stay white.”
Nigel Farage did not withdraw from the EFD. He continues to co-preside over it, along with the leader of the Lega Nord. MEP Nikki Sinclaire, however,Ā was expelled from UkipĀ for refusing to take part in the EFD because of their āextreme viewsā.
Links with domestic far-right parties
āUkip has no links toĀ the BNP,āĀ explained FarageĀ in 2007. The first line of anyĀ description of UkipĀ calls it āa libertarian, non-racist partyā. What party, other than one skating close to the lines of taste and decency, needs to describe itself as ānon-racistā? Farage boasted onĀ The Andrew Marr Show(20 January 2013) that āUkip is the only UK party to explicitly ban BNP members from joiningā. What party, other than a party whose policies are attractive to such organisations, would need to do that?
Christopher Monckton, their Scotland Leader and Head of Policy UnitĀ invited the now-defunct British Freedom PartyĀ ā an amalgamation of mostly breakaway BNP members led by a former Ukip candidate until January 2013 ā to join Ukip: āI would very much like them to come back and join us and we stand together.ā Ukipās excuse for this lapse? Monckton had been away on a tour of the US and was not up to speed with current policy. More recently, however, FarageĀ refused to vote to opposeĀ moves for the European Union to fund the BNP.
The founder of the party,Ā Alan Sked, saysĀ it has become “extraordinarily right-wing” and is now devoted to “creating a fuss, via Islam and immigrantsā.
Xenophobia
āOur traditional values have been undermined. Children are taught to be ashamed of our past.Ā Multiculturalism has split our society.Ā Political correctness is stifling free speechā, states theĀ Ukip manifesto. Their āPocket Guide to Immigrationā promises to āend support for multiculturalism and promote one, common British cultureā. After attracting some negative publicity, it has disappeared fromĀ here, but an archived version can be seenhereĀ (pdf).
One of their prospective MP candidatesĀ recently wrote: “A removal of multi-culturalism and assimilation of these people needs to be done to save them from the abyss of exclusion and welfare. Above all, one should not shy away of contemplating forced repatriation, or threatening it to further assimilation, as a result of their lack of economic contribution to the UK.” In fact their position on āforced repatriationā and āassimilationā is indistinguishable from the BNPās. Except, perhaps, that Ukipās 2005 manifestoĀ advocates that all incoming immigrantsĀ should be āsubject to health checksā for ācommunicable diseasesā.
More recently, during BBCāsĀ Question Time, Farage caused upset with some gross generalisations he made about Bulgarian people. He sent his trusted lieutenant and deputy chairman of the party Paul Nuttall to Bulgaria to defuse the situation. Nuttall explained that he had nothing to apologise for, since he never bashedĀ Bulgarians, but was just noting facts.Ā He stressedĀ that āBrits fear allĀ immigrants, regardless of where they would come from.ā
Islamophobia
āOn the question of Islamification,ā said FarageĀ during a well-received speech, āwe have to do a bit more to teach our children of the values of our Judeo-Christian society.ā He proceeded to note that at least 20 police forces are turning a blind eye to the operation of Sharia Law and expressed admiration for countries which say: āYouāre welcome to come here and to have your children here⦠but if youāre coming here to take us over, youāre not welcome.ā
AĀ recent manifesto commitmentĀ to “tackle extremist Islam by banning the burqa or veiled niqab in public buildings and certain private buildings” wasfurther explainedĀ by Farage: “I can’t go into a bank with a motorcycle helmet on. I can’t wear a balaclava going round the District and Circle line.ā
Finally, Ukip peer Lord PearsonĀ put it unequivocally. “The Muslims are breeding ten times faster than us,” he said. “I don’t know at what point they reach such a number we are no longer able to resist the rest of their demands.”
Misogyny
Ukipās only female MEP (after the expulsion of Nikki Sinclaire) Marta Andreasen,Ā recently threatened to leave the party, labelling Farage as an āanti-women Stalinist dictatorā whose view is that āwomen should be in the kitchen or in the bedroomā.
This came as no surprise. His grasp of sexual politics has always been tenuous at best. AsĀ he explained in aĀ TelegraphĀ interview: āLap dancing? Donāt have the time these days, but I used to go to them. Like it or not, they are a fact of life. You are talking about normal behaviour there. Everyone does it.ā Then, asked about extra-marital affairs, he conceded: āWell, weāre all human. There is a big difference between that sort of thing and being really bad.ā
When Godfrey Bloom MEP, infamous forĀ making a speechĀ in the European Parliament ā one of his better ones ā while heavily intoxicated, said that āno employer with a brain in the right place would employ a young, single, free womanā,Ā Farageās reactionĀ was āDear old Godders! Godfrey’s comment [as above] has been proved so right.ā
Views on the less able
In 2007, Jack Biggs alleged that he had been banned from running as a candidate because of his disability and presentedĀ significant evidence in support. Later, high-ranking member Alexandra SwannĀ sided with a Ukip councillorĀ who said it was dangerous to allow those who do not work to vote. Political Scrapbook reported her as saying that āallowing people to vote on how other peopleās money is spent ā if they donāt contribute ā is dangerousā. This, presumably, would include those unable to contribute because of disability.
Finally, the apotheosis (and demise of Godwinās law, forever hence) came when a UKIP candidate aired hisĀ repugnant viewsĀ about compulsory abortion of all disabled babies.
Homophobia
Ousted MEP Nikki Sinclaire, who came out as a lesbian,Ā won a sexual discrimination caseĀ against UKIP after refusing to sit with its homophobic allies in the European parliament.
On aĀ private membersā forum, senior UKIP member and former parliamentary candidate Dr Julia Gasper claimed some homosexuals prefer sex with animals. TheĀ MirrorĀ reported her as saying: āAs for the links between homosexuality and paedophilia, there is so much evidence that even a full-length book could hardly do justice to the Āsubject.ā (Ironically, UKIP General Secretary Jonathan Arnott had banned a discussion on the site on gay issues, because he feared that someone āis going to screenshoot comments and send them to a newspaperā.) She was sacked.
More recentlyĀ a UKIP Croydon North candidate tweeted: “A caring loving home is a heterosexual or single family. I don’t believe (a gay couple) is healthy for a child.” He did so, after retweeting an article written by a National Front supporter who claimed there was “no such thing as homophobia”. He was sacked.
However, Olly Neville, the former UKIP Youth Chairman,Ā was also sacked for supportingĀ same-sex marriage. Sack them all, as long as we donāt have to talk about it, seems to be the policy.
***
These are the facts and they speak for themselves. This is a barrel in which you would be lucky to find one good apple, misplaced among the rotten ones. Like former UKIP activistĀ Kim Gandy, who worked in care, but joked on Facebook that elderly peopleĀ should be euthanisedĀ when they become a burden (she told theĀ NSĀ the comments were written after a bad day, and have been taken out of context), orĀ Maggie Chapman, who cracks jokes about Muslims having sex with camels and āpakiā families going home and spreads Christmas cheer with her āeggnog for nig-nogsā. Farage can distance himself from all of them; sack all of them; disinherit all of them. The inescapable truth is that it is his policies which attract them and will keep doing so; they remain his āeccentricsā.
Paul NuttallĀ once wrote: āWe in Ukip know: if you champion British interest and culture then you are labelled a nationalist with all the connotations that goes [sic] with it.ā I would remind Nuttall of the distinction drawn by Charles De Gaulle: āPatriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.ā I look at the policies, the rhetoric and the candidates, and I see nothing about love of oneās own people. I see only hate for others.
Instead, if you find yourself nodding in agreement with a couple of items on Ukipās long list of empty promises, remember all the other things you will also be signing up for. They represent a particularly insidious brand of extremist; Bigotry Light, if you will ā all the hatred of normal bigotry, but none of the calories.
And rejoin The Reasonable, so we may continue to be the majority and laugh at things. Like thisĀ election leaflet.
Editor’s note: this article originally stated that Maggie Chapman worked in care and had made comments about euthanasia. This was misattributed, and has been corrected.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate