Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone is a harrowing account of life in Gaza as seen through the eyes of Palestinian children. It provides a rare window into young lives devastated by months of relentless bombings, displacements, and unspeakable horrors.
It aired on 17 February on BBC Two, but was swiftly removed from iPlayer four days later, following fierce lobbying from pro-Israel voices. The reasons given for its removal? Well, they simply donāt add up.
The main objection was that the father of Abdullah, the 13-year-old narrator, is the deputy minister of agriculture in Gazaās Hamas-run government. But like it or not, itās a fact of life in Gaza that almost anyone living there will have some connection to Hamas. Hamas runs the government, so anyone working in an official capacity must also work with Hamas. Not only that, but Abdullahās father is hardly a āterrorist leaderā as was claimed. He is a technocrat, in a role concerned with agriculture, not politics or military, who even studied at UK universities.
Other objections included the risk of payments potentially funding Hamas. But as Hoyo Films and now the boy himself have confirmed, Abdullah was paid a very small sum via his sisterās bank account which was used to cover basic living expenses. And the complaints around the use of antisemitic language have been rebuffed by many ā including Jewish Voice for Labour. The word āāYehudiā is simply Arabic for āIsraeli,ā and is used by Jewish Israeli journalist Yuval Abrahamto to describe himself in the Oscar-winning film No Other Land.
Crucially, absolutely nothing in the film has been found to be factually inaccurate.
The film received five stars in the Guardian and the Times, which described it as āexceptionalā. Itās an outstanding, powerful film and a crucial piece of journalism. Since international journalists are banned from Gaza, there are scant opportunities to witness Gazan childrenās stories. This film gave us a small insight and humanised Palestinian children.
Why then, is an innocent child, the victim of unimaginable suffering, put under such intense scrutiny as to whether or not they should be allowed to tell their story?
Consider the source
When you consider the source of the complaints, you canāt help but feel like the humanisation of Palestinians was precisely the problem.
Spearheading the campaign to have the documentary removed from public view was Tzipi Hotovely, Israelās ambassador to the UK. Throughout her political career, Hotovely has gone out of her way to dehumanise Palestinians, accusing them of being āthieves of historyā who have no heritage, and calling the Nakba ā the violent mass displacement of Palestinians ā āan Arab lie.ā More recently, she claimed there was āno humanitarian crisisā in Gaza.
Despite strong counterprotests from a far greater number of people wanting the documentary to stay put ā including over 1,000 industry professionals and more than 600 British Jews ā the BBC bowed to pressure from the pro-Israel lobby, and dutifully took the documentary down.
Thatās why I decided to start a petition, calling on the BBC to reconsider its decision, and allow Palestinian children their right to be heard. The petition quickly gained lots of support and now has over 25,000 signatures.
Failing Palestinian children
Not long after I started the petition, it emerged that Abdullah, the filmās 13-year-old narrator, has experienced harassment as a result of the kickback against the film, and now fears for his life. āI did not agree to the risk of me being targeted in any wayā, he said. And ā[if] anything happens to me, the BBC is responsible for it.”
Putting childrenās safety and mental wellbeing at risk is not only blatantly wrong, but is in breach of the BBCās own guidelines on safeguarding young people. Sadly, Abdullahās was not an isolated case.
In a recent interview with the Independent, former BBC newsreader Karishma Patel explained her reason for quitting the BBC: its longstanding refusal to show the full extent to which Irael is harming Palestinian children. She recalls how she begged the BBC to cover five-year-old Hind Rajabās story while she was still alive, trapped inside a car with her murdered relatives. The BBC chose not to, only naming her after she was killed, and not even making clear in the headline who had done it. āThe BBC failed Hind,ā says Patel. āAnd it has failed Palestinian children again in pulling the [Gaza] documentary.ā
Iāve just written to Tim Davie, Controller-General of the BBC, to draw his attention to the huge number of people who want the documentary to be reinstated, and why the reasons put forward to justify its removal simply do not add up. I told him, āAnyone who is offended by a child sharing their lived experiences of survival can choose not to watch it. But do not deny innocent children ā who have experienced unimaginable grief and loss ā the right to tell their stories.ā You can read my full letter here.
Letās see if he responds. The BBC didnāt bother reaching out to Abdullah to apologise to him after they pulled the film. So Iām not holding out too much hope.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
