What nationalising energy companies would cost ā and how to do it
UK could bring National Grid and retailers in-house and build public renewable energy, says ex-Labour policy chief
When 62% of Conservative voters want energy run in the public sector, itās fair to say the left has won the argument (75% of Labour voters agree, 68% of Lib Dems).
Yet public ownership is opposed passionately by the Conservative government, while the leader of the opposition has said he is ānot in favourā of it ā despite his election on a platform that committed to ābring rail, mail, water and energy into public ownership to end the great privatisation rip-off and save you money on your fares and billsā.
Public ownership is on the mediaās radar, too. When Labour leader Keir Starmer announced his policy to freeze bills this week, he was asked why he wouldnāt also nationalise energy, replying that: āIn a national emergency where people are struggling to pay their bills … the right choice is for every single penny to go to reducing those bills.ā
But so long as energy remains privatised, every single penny wonāt. Billions of pennies will keep going to shareholders instead.
The energy market was fractured under the mass privatisations of the Thatcher governments in the 1980s. It contains three sectors: producers or suppliers (those that produce energy), retailers (those that sell you energy), and distribution or transmission (the infrastructure that transports energy to your home).
It is important to bear this in mind when weāre talking about taking energy into public ownership. We need to be clear about what we want in public ownership and why.
By 2019, Labour had a detailed plan on how to do this ā worked up by the teams around then shadow business and energy secretary Rebecca Long Bailey and then shadow chancellor John McDonnell. The plan is not the only way, but it illustrates what exists and how one could go about re-establishing a public energy ecosystem, run for people not profit.
The recent TUC report shows the cost of nationalising the āBig 5ā energy retailers ā British Gas, E.ON, EDF, Scottish Power and Ovo ā to be Ā£2.8bn, which would go on buying all the companiesā shares. Thatās a lot of money, equivalent to more than the annual budget of the Sure Start programme in 2009/10 (its peak year). But itās a one-off cost, not an annual one.
And itās not like the current privatised system doesnāt have its costs: since June 2021, the UK government has spent Ā£2.7bn bailing out 28 energy companies that collapsed because they put short-term profits ahead of long-term stability ā companies like Bulb Energy. We have spent billions of pounds already to get nothing in return. So Ā£2.8bn is not a large amount of money to pay to gain these assets, rather than just bailing them out.
The big energy retail companies made £23bn in dividends between 2010 and 2020 according to Common Wealth, and £43bn if you include share buy-backs. What you choose to do with that surplus in public ownership is another matter: you could use it to invest in new clean energy or to lower bills or fund staff pay rises, rather than subject your workers to fire-and-rehire practices as British Gas did last year.
Labourās previous plan also involved taking the distribution networks ā the National Grid ā into public ownership. This would end the profiteering at this level, too ā with Ā£13bn paid out in dividends over the five years prior to 2019. As Long Bailey said at the time, we need āpublic driven and coordinated action, without which we simply will not be able to tackle climate changeā. Like previous nationalisations, the purchase of the grid and distribution networks could be achieved by swapping shares for government bonds. By international accounting standards, the cost is fiscally neutral as the state gains a revenue-generating asset, which more than pays for the bond yield.
The final part of the plan ā and the most complicated ā is production and supply. It would be impossible to nationalise the oilfields of Saudi Arabia or Qatar ā and for good reasons we should want to leave fossil fuels in the ground, anyway, rather than contest their ownership.
And so what Labour proposed in 2019 was a mass investment in new renewable energy generation projects, with the public sector taking a stake and returning profits to the public. For example, under the āPeopleās Power Planā, we proposed 37 new offshore wind farms with a 51% public stake, delivering 52GW alone by 2030, equivalent to 38 coal power stations. There were additional proposals for onshore wind, solar, and tidal schemes, as part of a 10-year Ā£250bn Green Transformation Fund, which included other schemes like the Warm Homes insulation initiative.
Labourās new shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves has promised a similar level of investment ā a Ā£28bn a year climate investment pledge.
Any surplus energy would then be sold on international markets, with a Peopleās Power Fund ā a sort of sovereign wealth fund ā to deliver public investment in local communitiesā social infrastructure: a genuine levelling-up fund, perhaps.
Many people will say this canāt be done, but of course it has been before. The 1945 Attlee government nationalised energy and successive Conservative governments ā including those of Churchill, MacMillan and Heath ā were happy to have a nationalised asset. Harold MacMillan famously accused Margaret Thatcher of āselling off the family silverā when she privatised state industries.
When I was born in 1979, the National Coal Board, British Gas and British Petroleum were all publicly-owned or majority publicly-owned companies. Between them, they were the major suppliers of our energy. Our gas bills came from British Gas and our electricity bills from our regional electricity board (in my case Seeboard, the South Eastern Electricity Board), and coal and oil fuelled our power stations.
The regional electricity boards had been brought into being by the Attlee governmentās Electricity Act 1947, when electricity companies were forcibly merged into regional area boards and nationalised. The Coal Industry Nationalisation Act 1946 and the Gas Act 1948 had together brought energy into public ownership.
Seeboard was privatised in 1990, and later became part of EDF Energy ā ironically, the nationalised French energy company, whose profits from the UKās stupidity are used to subsidise French consumers.
The French government has now fully nationalised EDF (previously it was 84% publicly owned), and household energy bills rose by just 4% this year ā compared to over 50% in the UK and a forecast 200% by January 2023.
If Starmer doesnāt want to listen to me (or his own commitments from 2020), perhaps emulating the centrist Emmanuel Macron in this instance would be palatable?
From the depletion of fish stocks to the burning of the Amazon, profit has proved a failed regulator for use of our natural resources
In his later years, Robin Cook argued: āThe market is incapable of respecting a common resource such as the environment, which provides no price signal to express the cost of its erosion nor to warn of the long-term dangers of its destruction.ā
From the depletion of fish stocks to the burning of the Amazon, profit has proved a failed regulator for use of our natural resources. The market has also failed to decarbonise at pace, or to end the scourge of fuel poverty.
On the media this week, shadow energy secretary Ed Miliband said Labour is ācontinuing to look at what the right long-term solution is for our energy systemā. It is up to all of us to campaign for that solution to be public ownership ā whether thatās from within the Labour Party (like me) or from the outside.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
