Power For Profit is Still the Prime Directive
The climate crisis is proof positive that the ruling class is an utter failure ā but it will not fall on its own. Can the working class rise to the challenge? It sure will help if we understand that our class interests are not merely the economic needs of working peopleĀ ā no matter how important that is ā but the universal interests of a healthy planet for all the people. Letās start acting like it.
The corporate solutions to the climate crisis must dodge the causes of the crisis. The ruling class uses deception and secrecy to limit public debate. When the facts become obvious and overwhelming corporate politicians simply refuse to debate it. Gag rules are back in fashion. When the people demand a Green New Deal the same politiciansĀ water it down and disarm it.
Meanwhile, the Corporate State pursues the only agenda it has ever known: power and profit. If we accept corporate empire as normal, natural or eternal there is nothing left but better management, technical fixes, adaptation, and illusions of endless growth.
Since corporate capitalism is a āgrow or dieā system, it cannot consider limits even at a time when planetary limits are on display for all to see and verified by our best science. For example, there is no place in corporate plans for the conservation of energy despite the fact that energy not used is the truest form of clean energy. Instead of keeping in the ground, itās always more and more.
Former Trump Secretary of State and former Exxon-Mobile CEO, Rex Tillerson repeats the managerial view.
āIām not disputing that increasing CO2 emissions in the atmosphere is going to have an impactā¦we believe those consequences are manageableā¦.Itās an engineering problem and it has engineering solutions.[1]
Shell Oil tried those āsolutionsā by investing $5 billion on Arctic exploration betting that the melting ice caps would clear the way to new-found riches. The āgrow or dieā dynamic at the heart of capitalism pushes all the corporations into The Race for Whatās Left. They cannot stop themselves because the quest for limitless profits compels limitless growth. No capitalist enterprise can opt out of the system for long and survive.
The latest liberal-sounding twist on the management and engineering ploy is for oil companies, the military, and elite think tanks like the Rand Corporation to push āadaptation and resilienceā as a form of acceptance to climate catastrophe.
Meanwhile, the corporate state itself boosts yet another āgold-rush.ā In fact, the US government led the charge to the ālast great frontierā in this 2013 National Strategy for the Arctic :
āThis strategy is intended to position theĀ United States to respond effectively to challenges and emerging opportunities arising from significant increases in Arctic activity due to the diminishment of sea ice and the emergence of a new Arctic environment.ā
And the #1 concern:
āWe will enable our vessels and aircraft to operate, consistent with international law, through, under, and over the airspace and waters of the Arctic, support lawful commerceā¦.ā
The government will respond to the āemerging opportunitiesā of a ānew Arctic environmentā to support ālawful commerceā with our military might. The new arctic gold-rush is the same as the old one, except now it threatens worldwide disaster. We can count on corporate power to double-down as the crisis worsens. And they are doubling down on us.
Their other plan is to suppress dissent. A new security industry grew dramatically after 9/11 to become a wing of the intelligence community and military. From Nigeria to Standing Rock, to Honduras environmental activists face militarized police and violent suppression including assassination and jail time. Since 2010, 1000 environmental defenders have been murdered, many of them native people.
By 2017 nearly 20 StatesĀ have considered making protest a crime. Protectors have beenĀ accused of being terrorists. Even old-line private armies like the Pinkertons have retooled themselves for climate change. There is no border between national security and business opportunity for oil cops and mercenaries who exercise the police powers and military duties of the corporate empire both at home and abroad.
Q. Whose Plans are These? A. The Ruling Class Thatās Whose.
Yes, there is a ruling class. Here are just a few of its major features in regard to war and climate destruction.
While not without its fissures and fractures, the elites rule through a network of powerful institutions that consolidated power on a global scale by merging the state ā the US government in particular ā with the largest corporations. This fusion is the systematic foundation of the twin crises of war and climate destruction.
Since the corporate state seeks to use āall their means of powerā they have effectively integrated the military, government, big oil, big media and big banks into the interlocking force of corporate power.
Here it is ā straight from the Armyās mouth:
āCompetition between contending groups using all their means of power has always characterized the international environmentā¦.Such competition involved all instruments of state power: diplomatic, informational, military, and economicā¦expanded in some recent policy documents to diplomatic, informational, military, economic, financial, intelligence, and law enforcementā¦ā
The corporate state came of age as it assimilated āall instruments of state powerā into its network.
A key connection, for example, is the deployment of banks and bankers, including the IMF and World Bank asĀ weapons in the pursuit of common objectives ā as was obvious in the recent coup attempt against Venezuela that also enlisted āinformationalā giants likeĀ Google, Facebook, and Twitter in the war effort. Even faux-environmentalist groups Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, and Environmental Defense Fund have taken money from and provided cover for the fossil fuel giants.[2]
The Revolving Door?
The interlocking institutions work in many ways but one means is the so-called ārevolving door.ā The merger of finance capital with government has been well documented by Nomi Prins. This CBS News analysisĀ lists the names of Goldman Sachs executives āat the highest reaches of power both in Washington and around the world.ā Two recent reports by Public Citizen document the connections between Federal Trade Commission officials and the corporations they are supposed to regulate and the routine transfer of politiciansĀ to the front ranks of corporate lobbyists.
The same kind of dual office holding is business as usual for the military-industrial complex.
āAs many as 380 high-ranking Defense Department officials and officersā¦left government to become lobbyists, corporate board members and defense contractor consultantsā¦.In 645 instances documented by the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight, officials went to work for major contractorsāBoeing, General Dynamics and United Technologies are the top threeāwith nearly 90 percent of them doing lobbying.ā
These officials are lobbying ā they work connections. The ārevolving doorā metaphor fails to describe how corporate power is staffed. These politicians, bankers and generals are not moving in and out of anything. Instead, they are simply being transferred to different āduty stationsā ā to borrow a military term. Individuals play various roles as a means to develop the connections and gain the experience needed to seal the relationships between the interlocking institutions of the corporate state.
Oil money also greases the wheelsĀ making sure the political parties can function. At the pinnacles of power, a global ruling class of highly interlocked corporationsĀ showers US politicians with cash.Ā
New research from sociologistĀ Josh MurrayĀ reveals the inner workings of the global machine. Murrayās high-powered statistical analysis shows that the more interlocked with each other corporations are, the more they act as a coherent ruling class aware of their global class interest. It is precisely these highly connected organizationsĀ that have the strongest relationships with the US political system.
ā[T]he most likely to form PACs and donate money to US politicians are those firms that make up the āinner circleāā¦in the G500 (Global Fortune 500)ā¦.[Those] most central in the transnational interlock network are the most likely to form PACs.
An interlocking system of corporations allows them to intervene in US elections as a matter of routine. Citizenās United just legalized the system. Itās not the Russians, itās corporate power. Give up the fantasy of free-market fundamentalism ā it cannot be proven using evidence. Welcome to Corporate Power ā itās the only form of capitalism that matters ā and we can see it all around us.
Q. Will the Working Class āInherit the Earth?ā A. We Do Not Inherit the Earth from our Ancestors; We Borrow it from our Children. ā Chief Seattle
The ruling elites have an organized class consciousness that thinks globally and acts globally. They use all the means at their disposal. How about us?
They have the corporation, we have the coalition. They already have a network of powerful organizations while we aspire, or should, to a āmovement of movements.ā Just as the ārevolving doorā cements ruling class ties we should aim to raise an army of ākey workersā (a term we use in union organizing to find and support the real leaders) that can build the linkages between the peace movement, the climate movement, labor, and all the other social movements. There is not a single social movement or community that does not have a stake in the climate crisis.
Climate crisis is a revolutionary situation if we have the vision and audacity to make it so. We cannot continue to live or act in the old way and our rulers cannot rule as they have. Something has got to give. I have observed and participated in four decades of the perennial attempts to find ideological unity. We cannot agree on exactly what kind of class consciousness we are after or what socialism really means. We love to argue with each other ā me too. But instead, we need to balance our ideological preoccupations with organizing.Ā That means dramatically scaling up our engagements with everyday people and starting where they are not where we want them to be. Careful listening is the first step.
In the end, organizing is about action. In the end, organizing is all about āpower to the people.ā When millions move we will find the way forward together. There is no other way for us to learn democracy:
āThe organizerās rhetorical, strategic and tactical repertoire is designed to produce social action because it is in the tumult of political life that leaders emerge, relationships develop and transformations in consciousness are realized.ā
Organizing also means learning to navigate and find strength in differences ā because differences are the concrete conditions of our movement. Nothing ā nothing ā is ever going to change that.
Perhaps we can move forward by developing a program that promotes on-the-ground unity in action without uniformity in ideas or analysis. Coalitions are designed to be just that ā unity without uniformity. Here are some tips on coalition building.
The height of political skill is not getting everyone you agree with in a room to draw up a platform, analysis or manifesto. The height of political skill is to build a movement ā of people you do not fully agree with ā that can successfully execute a plan of action. That is real solidarity that looks like the real working-class.
We are held down by intersectingĀ and mutually reinforcing structures of domination andĀ hierarchy ā empire, class, race, gender, age, sexuality and more. These codes and structures of dominion find their ultimate expression as the climate crisis. Perhaps we will be liberated by turning those same intersecting lines of oppression and exploitation into pathways of resistance.
[T]he perspective and political practice some of us currently call intersectionality is fundamentally ecological, is insisting on the organic, interactive, complex, and interdependent nature of oppression, and therefore, by both necessity and our own nature, of liberationā¦Each kind of oppression has its strategic importance in the reproduction of domination and props up the others, just as each struggle has moments of igniting a broader swath of resistance and leading that moment.āĀ Aurora Levins MoralesĀ āMedicine Storiesā p. 25-6.
If the forms of oppressionĀ intersect, then the forms of liberation must intersect as well. Each struggle, while rooted in the particular conditions of some people, place and time, offer lessons and produce resources that apply to everyone. The Red Nation gets right to it:
Thus the Red Deal is āRedā because it prioritizes Indigenous liberation, on one hand, and a revolutionary left position, on the other. It is simultaneously particular and universal, because Indigenous liberation is for everybody.
Our movement crisscrosses at the intersection of what is āsimultaneously particular and universal.āĀ If you are looking to the working-class for leadership you will know we are ready when we become āa class for itselfā that is simultaneously on the way to becoming a class for the whole people and the whole earth. This way we can inherit the earth without owning it and receive its bounty without destroying it. This way we can win.
*Read the entire series on War is Climate Change. Big thanks to Geoff Herzog for his editorial assistance and close reading of the series.
Notes.
1/ Tellerson is quoted by Oscar Reyes in āClimate Change INC: How TNCs are Managing Risk and Preparing to Profit in World of Runaway Climate Change.ā p 63, in Buxton and Hayes, The Secure and the Dispossessed
2/ Naomi Klein, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs The Climate, ppĀ 355-365
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
1 Comment
Good! However, I do think there is a crucial missing feature/factor: contradiction. “The global ruling class” is not a conistent and coherent entity. They might have the same interests vis-vis their exploited workers, but they also have conflict(s) of interests buot in the competition you have mentioned. Competition between nation states (markets, resources, etc). The trade war between China and the US is one example. The conflict of interests between regional and Western powers in the Middle East is another.