Source: Scheerpost
The biggest business in America is stealing and defrauding the federal government, Uncle Sam and you the taxpayers. In terms of sheer stolen dollars, the total amount is greater than the annual sales of Amazon and Walmart over the past two years.
Before getting to the real big stuff, start with how much was stolen or not delivered by the contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. Just in one program, John SpokoāSpecial Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR), estimated that $30 billion of the $100 billion repairs project was purloined. Despite his many damning reports on what was also wastedālike the $40 million natural gas-powered fueling station (there were no natural gas-powered cars in Afghanistan)āno one was indicted, no one was fired, no one missed a promotion. This is according to author Andrew Cockburn, who interviewed Spoko extensively for his new bookĀ The Spoils of War: Power, Profit and the American War Machine.Ā In fact, Cockburn writes: āThey were giving bonuses to people for stealing our money.ā
Of the $360 billion in annual billing fraud by the health care industry, over $100 billion is fraud on Medicare and Medicaid.
Turning to the $6 trillion appropriated (without reversing the tax cuts by Trump on the super-rich) by both Trump and Biden since March 2020, government investigators and the media are seeing staggering thefts and frauds. Money was stolen outright by fake companies and fraudulent applications, or taken by profitable companies, law firms and others that these programs were never intended to benefit.
One estimate has the trillion dollar Paycheck Protection Program delivering only 25 percent to the people for whom it was intended. Even people like the notorious anti-taxer Grover Norquist, who is loaded with corporate donations, applied for and got a bundle of tax dollars.
From the beginning I called members of Congress to caution them to draft very tight language in the giant rescue and infrastructure programs in order to foresee and forestall the predictable giant heist. There were some provisionsāexpanding enforcement budgets and inserting certain general review obligations on government agencies. But it was massively too little and too lateā and utterly inadequate for the volume of coming robberies.
Corporate lobbyists were already swarming over Capitol Hill to get their bailouts, grants, sweetheart contracts and other benefits. The airlines got about $50 billion in bailouts, for example, after they had bought back $45 billion of their own stock from passenger revenues.
The mass media was also largely inattentive, spending far more time on the friction between politicians in Congress than the burning of taxpayer dollars. The Inspectors General attached to each federal agency were timid, under-budgeted and had weak authority.Ā Moreover, several Inspectors General positions were vacant.
Professor Malcolm Sparrow at Harvard has shown how there are specific, proven ways to prevent thefts and frauds on government programs. Effective criminal law enforcement authority, adequate enforcement budgets and plenty of investigators and auditors with higher level political support are crucial.
Neither Congress nor the White House have met this challenge of titanic corruption which should become a major campaign subject in the coming elections. Apart from a few perfunctory hearings, Congress has not held the high profile intense hearings that grab public attentionāin part because both Parties have culpability, though the GOP is worse.
Biden spoke briefly this month about this thievery in his State of the Union address and promised a chief prosecutor for pandemic fraud. Ā This is a little late. And where was the mention of adequate budget and authority? Professor Sparrow recommends that the enforcement budgets for commercial crimes have to be at least one percent of the estimated theft/fraud. The Biden oversight isnāt a tenth of that measure.
Finally,Ā TheĀ Washington PostĀ andĀ The New York TimesĀ have started to investigate. The findings of their lengthy features are predictably staggering, especially regarding the Small Business Administration (SBA) which dispatched $343 billion in PPP loans over a 14 day period!
As recounted in the NY Times article by David Farenthold, a free for all robbery spree took hold.Ā The SBA made classic, foreseeable blunders. First, it subcontracted out, without due diligence, to so-called nonprofits, the job of distributing and monitoring the expenditures, giving them 15 percent of the overall disbursements to, for example, children feeding programs. The blunder not only is an inappropriate delegation of governmental powers, but it also creates a perverse incentive for the overseer to shovel out money to subcontractors.
Bidenās Department of Agriculture arrogantly turned down Farentholdās request to interview officials there. This is another sign of unpreparedness, enabled by a Congress that astonishingly let the Department āwaive rules that had been put in place after previous scandals to make sure states watched the watchdogs,ā wrote Farenthold. (SeeĀ āF.B.I. Sees āMassive Fraudā in Groupsā Food Programs for Needy Childrenā.)
A longer expose appeared inĀ The Washington PostĀ by Tony Romm with the headline āāImmense Fraudā Creates Immense Task for Washington As It Tries to Tighten Scrutiny of $6 Trillion in Emergency Coronavirus Spendingā.
Rommās examples are about sheer theft. A person pleaded guilty who somehow got $4 million and spend chunks of it buying a Porsche, a Mercedes and a BMW. A man was sentenced to prison for obtaining $800,000 for a business that did not exist. Fake or shell companies getting grants and unpayable loans illustrate that the guardrails were non-existent in thousands of cases.
So minimal are the prosecutorial initiatives that the commercial criminals are still Ā actively seeking Ā huge sums in grants, loans, direct payments and other forms of emergency assistance.
The SBAās diligent Inspector General, Hannibal āMikeā Ware, has been producingĀ report after report, incurring the hatred of Trump and his then-SBA Administrator, and still not convincing Congress that without more enforcement funds, the corporate crime wave will prosper unabated. Even so, Romm points to evidence that dozens of criminal fraud cases were preventable with some more diligence from the SBA. It isnāt reassuring that Romm reported that SBA officials turned down interview requests by theĀ Post.
Recent efforts by a long-culpable Congress and a long-neglectful Presidency are not close to catching up with current robberies, not to mention any chance of retrieving stolen monies. Ever since I requested in 1971 that President Richard Nixon set up a commission on corporate crime, the federal government has remained obstinately indifferent to the sheer scale of ācrime in the suites.ā Consider the looted military contracting budget and the global level of corporate tax evasions up against the tepid responses from Washington. Too much discretion was delegated to the state and local governments without strict criteria. One New York Republican-controlled municipality is about to spend $12 million to renovate a baseball stadium.
Without a tradition of Congress requiring annual compliance reports from federal agencies, which would require securing regular data feedback flows, the government Ā will continue to be caught flat-footed.
Why should the three working days a week Congress, with no skin in the game, really care? If it isnāt the unorganized taxpayers paying for these massive thefts, the next generation of Americans will get the tab. Especially since the solons on Capitol Hill have refused to rescind the huge Trump tax escapes for the wealthy and giant corporations that have ballooned the federal deficit.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
1 Comment
I lived in a Latin American country long thought of as middle-class, filled with talent, rich with resources and yet it was always cycling from one crisis to another. Periods of civilian governments would be followed by military governments, each leading to eventual catastrophe. Why? I often wondered and was always looking for insights, clues, understanding.
One principal factor came to stand out among many, endemic corruption, no matter who was in power, and, importantly, class warfare and lack of a sense of common community and shared responsibility. Always, it seemed, self-interest, selfish self-interest would hover over the country.
I used to belief that a “sense of community,” a kind of national concern for one another was an element that existed in the US, but like with that Latin American country, I came to see that this “sense of community,” while it existed, it was far less universal and weaker than I believed. As a young idealist I had been taken in by cultural pride, greed, and a powerful lack of self-knowledge.
For many many years I have seen that the path of that Latin American country was a well.worn one in the US as well. I think Nader has long seen this.