A principal goal of the Trump administrationās policy at the U.S.-Mexico border āand in Central America, considered of late only in relation to that border ā has been to get other governments to handle the increase in migrants seeking to enter the United States.
This means getting Mexico to send troops to its border with the U.S.; to enforce the system of āmetering,ā which limits the number of asylum-seekers who may approach a U.S. port of entry each day; to surveil caravans; and to deport more non-Mexicans than the United States does. It means sending Mexican forces to the border with Guatemala ā and ignoring those forcesā record of human rights abuses, particularly of migrants.
It means promoting the fiction that Mexico and Guatemala have the capacity and responsibility to process large numbers of asylum claims from people fleeing violence and persecution in other parts of the world; declaring Guatemala āsafeā for U.S.-bound refugees; making vulnerable asylum-seekers wait in some of Mexicoās most dangerous cities before their case can be heard in the U.S.; and, this summer, adopting an unprecedented policyĀ that declares anyone who arrives at the U.S.-Mexico border via another country ineligible for asylum if they did not first ask for protection in that country.
Another way to describe these efforts is what the U.S. security establishment has long referred to as āpushing out the border.ā Itās not a project thatās new to the Trump administration, and itās not one thatās unique to the United States, as journalist Todd Miller expounds in his latest book, āEmpire of Borders: The Expansion of the U.S. Border Around the World.ā
āHundreds of millions in U.S. funds have flowed to Central American borders to turn them into U.S.-style defensible zones.ā
Consider the border between Guatemala and Honduras. There, the U.S. has sponsored border task forces named, ironically, for indigenous groups, who for decades have suffered human rights abuses at the hands of U.S.-trained forces in both countries. Miller visits the Guatemalan ChortĆ Task Force, which was stood up with $13.4 million from U.S. Southern Command in 2015 and received training in communications, intelligence, firearms, setting up checkpoints, and looking for tracks of migrants on foot. On patrol with their Honduran counterpart, the Maya ChortĆ, Miller gets a glimpse of a brand-new airport in the jungle. Its goal is to attract tourists visiting the āMundo Mayaā corridor of archeological sites in the region, and it features kiosks from U.S. industrial conglomerate 3M equipped for fingerprinting and the facial recognition of elite travelers who want to breeze through security. Meanwhile, living Mayan communities are increasingly fleeing the region, thanks to crushing poverty, climate change, land dispossession, and violence.
In Central America as elsewhere, the U.S. border apparatus got its start and ideological underpinnings during the age of territorial expansion, and Miller dives into that history in the Philippines and elsewhere. But the āexponential growthā of the apparatus starts with 9/11 and leads to a blurring of lines between immigration and war: migration as threat, the nation as homeland, everything as security. Itās not just the border that Americans are pushing outward; itās the very concept of the border as a front line in a war. This too, has been a focus of U.S. training. Officials tell Miller bluntly that many foreign border forces are āconstrained,ā meaning they donāt have the broad powers of search, seizure, and arrest that U.S. border agencies claim. In many countries, a CBP trainer says, customs agents are ātax collectorsā; the U.S. is trying to āmove forward in increasing their authority so that theyāre able to do what they need to do.ā
The U.S. also aims to āextend the border beyond the physical borderā into the online realm, in the words of a contractor for CBPās National Targeting Center, which screens travelers and cargo. That border is one that inhales vast quantities of data in order to profile individuals long before they reach U.S. shores, subjecting them to āextreme vetting.ā As The Interceptās Sam Biddle has reported, Homeland Security has even made open-source software available to enable other countries to do the kind of watchlisting and no-fly lists the U.S. does.
The exponential growth of the border apparatus starts with 9/11 and the blurring of lines between immigration and war.
Not much in this sector is open-source. Much of Millerās book relates his hops around a series of expos and conferences where border technology is sold. The expos show off the amount of money to be made in this particular chunk of the military-industrial complex, from ground sensors to social media mining. (The U.S. Chamber of Commerce even had a rep at the Seguridad Expo in Mexico City.) Wandering around the show floors at these events (I attended some of the same ones Miller writes about), theĀ exhibits are more craven than impressive. The ideology on display is important, but the mercenary motives of the trend to secure the worldās borders are also obvious.
Here, and generally speaking when talking about obsessions with borders, the U.S. has a rival in Israel. A rival and partner: CBP and DHS officers go to Israel for training, and the Israeli company Elbit builds surveillance towers for the U.S. border. Miller quotes an Israel brigadier general telling an audience in El Paso, Texas, that Gaza is āa great laboratory.ā
If terrorism is the oft-cited justification for border controls, the real reason ā inequality ā is also apparent. Miller quotes the U.S. diplomat George Kennan (architect of the containment policy against communism), who declared āa certain unchallengeable antagonism between āhim that hasā and āhim that has not.āā The threat to U.S. dominance was one that sprung from āa jealous and embittered world.ā These words describe exactly (flooding bases aside) the obsession with climate change as a military threat. No one doubts that climate change has and will cause massive displacement and migration around the world, but it does not also have to cause prosperous states to harden their borders even more. In the world order envisioned by the U.S. and many other countries, citizenship has become more important than fundamental human rights.
The basic theme of Millerās book ā that all these systems exist to ensure āopen borders for the elite and a caste system for everyone elseā ā is familiar. But that doesnāt mean itās not worth repeating.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate