Source: Truthout

Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) has indicated that Democrats aren’t currently considering impeaching President Donald Trump — meaning that the issue likely won’t be a talking point in the final months leading up to the midterm elections, despite data demonstrating that impeachment is popular among voters.

Speaking to CNBC’s Emily Wilkins at the network’s “CEO Council Summit” in Washington, D.C., Jeffries said that, while the Trump administration has been “completely and totally out of control,” Democrats aren’t currently pursuing impeachment.

“We haven’t ruled anything in; we haven’t ruled anything out,” Jeffries elaborated.

The leader of the Democrats in the House of Representatives also said that, “from an accountability standpoint,” the party “will be centered around delivering the type of government that’s actually focused on improving the quality of life of the American people, as opposed to the self-dealing that we’re seeing occur right now.”

Impeachment isn’t something the party is thinking about “at this moment,” he added.

Jeffries’s comments suggest that the party’s strategy in the coming months is to focus primarily on policy, with limited discussion on holding Trump and members of his administration accountable.

The strategy is not an unusual one — discussions of impeachment are rare to begin with, and candidates may consider it taboo to discuss impeaching someone ahead of actually getting elected.

Not all Democrats agree with the strategy, however. Several House Democrats have called for Trump’s impeachment numerous times in recent months.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) has also issued calls for Trump’s impeachment. In April, Markey said that Trump deserved to be removed from office over the president’s “unstable” threat to destroy “a whole civilization,” comments that were referencing Iran a few weeks into the administration’s war in the Middle East. More recently, Markey said that Trump’s attempt to create a “weaponization” slush fund — to pay out allies that felt targeted by DOJ efforts to hold them legally accountable for their actions during the January 6 attack — also warranted impeachment proceedings.

“Trump’s ‘weaponization fund’ … is his latest impeachable offense: using the machinery of government and billions in taxpayer dollars to reward allies, pay off insurrectionists, and shield himself, his family, and associates from accountability,” Markey said.

But like House leadership, Senate Democratic leaders have downplayed calls for impeaching Trump. When the president issued his genocidal threats against Iran, for example, Senate Democratic leadership condemned the remarks but did not go so far as to say impeachment was on the table.

The terms for impeachment are laid out in Article II Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution:

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Historically, the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” has been understood to mean an abuse of power by a person in political office. There are plenty of examples of Trump abusing his current station, including his making billions of dollars from the presidency and his use of the Department of Justice to target his opponents.

While Democratic leaders in both houses of Congress attempt to avoid discussing impeachment, polling shows that a majority of voters are in favor of the idea.

Strength in Numbers/Verasight poll, conducted in mid-April, found that 55 percent of Americans believe the House should impeach Trump, while just 37 percent were against the idea. (Another 8 percent were unsure.)

“That net +18 verdict puts Trump in the neighborhood of the numbers Richard Nixon saw at the peak of the Watergate scandal in August 1974,” data journalist G. Elliott Morris reported.

Meanwhile, a Free Speech for People/Lake Research Partners poll published around the same time showed that 52 percent of Americans supported impeachment, while only 40 percent were opposed. Among independents, the numbers were stronger — 55 percent of those voters back impeaching Trump, with only 34 percent opposed.

Support for impeaching Trump appears to be consistent across polls. It’s also consistent across time. More than a year ago, just months into the second Trump presidency, a Data for Progress poll found that 52 percent of voters backed the idea of impeaching him.


This article was originally published by Truthout; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Chris Walker is a news writer at Truthout, and is based out of Madison, Wisconsin. Focusing on both national and local topics since the early 2000s, he has produced thousands of articles analyzing the issues of the day and their impact on the American people.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version