Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube Discord RSS
    X (Twitter) YouTube RSS Discord Bluesky
    ZNetwork
    Donate
    Login
    • LATEST
      • Articles
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
      • Featured
      • Series
      • Debates
      • Interviews
      • Reviews
      • Z Originals
    • TOPICS
      • Activism
      • Ecology
      • Economy
      • Feminism & Gender
      • International Relations
      • Corporate Media
      • Politics & Government
      • Race & Community
      • Vision & Strategy
        • Participatory Society
        • Parpolity
        • Parecon
        • Life after Capitalism
      • All Topics
    • PLACES
      • Africa
      • Asia
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • China
      • Europe
      • Palestine & Israel
      • Latin/South America
      • Middle East
      • Ukraine
      • Venezuela
      • All Places
    • CONTRIBUTORS
    • LEARN
      • Online School
      • Z Media Institute: Instructional Series
        • Radical Theory
        • Political Economy
        • Economic Vision
        • Global Economy
        • Institutional Racism
        • U.S Foreign Policy
        • Logic & Stats
      • The Chomsky Sessions: Video Series
      • Digital Books & Series
      • Reading Lists
      • Debates
      • Z Magazine Archive
      • Commentary Archive
      • Vintage Z
    • VISION & STRATEGY
    • STAFF PICKS
    • ABOUT Z
      • Z Staff
      • Z Friends
      • Editorial Philosophy
      • Submissions
      • Support Z
      • Contact
    ZNetwork
    Home » ZNet Articles » Iraq: When Should US Troops Leave?
    Activism Foreign Policy International Relations Iraq Middle East

    Iraq: When Should US Troops Leave?

    avatarBy Stephen R. ShalomFebruary 5, 2008Z ArticleNo Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Bluesky Email

    [This is the footnoted version of a presentation given to the Bloomfield/Glen Ridge Caucus organized by Bloomfield and Glen Ridge Peace Action, February 2, 2008]

     
    Everyone who isn’t a total flunky of the Bush administration knows that the war in Iraq has been based on lies.
     
    In fact, according to a recent study by the Center for Public Integrity and the Fund for Independence in Journalism, in the two years following 9-11 top administration officials told 935 lies about the national security threat posed by Iraq.1
     
    But many people of good will wonder: even if the war was the result of lies, even if the US invasion was unjust and illegal, what do we do now? Does the "Pottery Barn rule" so often mentioned by Colin Powell — we broke it, we own it — apply. And if we own it, what do we do with it?
     
    Well, in fact the Pottery Barn denies it has such a rule, but in any case the so-called Pottery Barn rule has no moral standing. The colonial powers ravaged Africa: but that didn’t give them the right to own it and decide its future. The Soviet Union invaded Hungary and Czechoslovakia, but this didn’t give them right to decide the fate of those countries.
     
    As Noam Chomsky has noted, an invader has no rights, only obligations.2 The only people with rights in Iraq are the Iraqi people. What do they think should happen? This ought to be at least the starting point for our inquiry.
     
    Now the problem of course is that it’s not so easy to ascertain the views of Iraqis — after all, Iraq today is a non-functioning society, in the midst of massive violence, with more than one out of every seven Iraqis displaced — either within the country or as a refugee. Town meetings are not easily organized in Iraq. Participatory democracy doesn’t flourish amidst car-bombs and air-strikes.
     
    Nevertheless, we do have some indication of what Iraqis think. For example, focus groups of Iraqis were organized for the U.S. military this past November. According to a report in the Washington Post, which was able to obtain a summary of the results,
     
    "Iraqis of all sectarian and ethnic groups believe that the U.S. military invasion is the primary root of the violent differences among them, and see the departure of ‘occupying forces’ as the key to national reconciliation…."3
     
    Pentagon analysts said they thought this was good news because it indicated that Iraqis held some "shared beliefs" that might eventually allow them to surmount the divisions that have led to a civil war. It is indeed good news for Iraqis, but needless to say it’s not much of an endorsement of the US military presence.
     
    We don’t have many details of the focus group findings, but there have been a variety of public opinion polls that have been carried out in Iraq — by different polling companies — that are consistent with one another and with the US military focus group results.
     
    If you look at the tables I distributed, you’ll see (in Table 1) that as of the latest poll in August 2007, 47 percent of Iraqis want US forces to leave immediately4; more than half of the Arab population — that is, the Sunni Arabs and the Shia Arabs, excluding the Kurds — supports immediate withdrawal,5 and the Kurds of course are the one group who do not have US troops in their region. The sentiment in favor of withdrawal is strongest in Anbar province, where US officials are so proud of their new relationship with some Sunni tribes.6 Table 2 shows that 79 percent of the population, including 84 percent of the Shiite Arabs and 98 percent of the Sunni Arabs, oppose the presence of "coalition" forces in Iraq.
     
     
    Table 1: Iraqi Public Opinion, August 2007
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    How long do you think US and other coalition forces should remain in Iraq? They should:
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    8/24/2007
    3/5/2007
    11/22/2005
     
    All
    Sunni
    Shiite
    Kurd
    All
    Sunni
    Shiite
    Kurd
    All
    Leave now
    47
    72
    44
    8
    35
    55
    28
    11
    26
    Remain until security is restored
    34
    27
    38
    36
    38
    41
    39

    ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

    Donate

    Related Posts

    No related posts.

    Donate Facebook Twitter Reddit Bluesky Email
    avatar
    Stephen R. Shalom

    Stephen R. Shalom (born September 8, 1948) is professor emeritus of political science at William Paterson University in NJ. Among other topics, he writes about U.S. foreign policy and political vision. He is on the editorial board of New Politics and a member of Jewish Voice for Peace and the Real Utopia network.

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    More by Stephen R. Shalom

    On the Barricades for Social Justice

    By Stephen R. ShalomSeptember 5, 2025

    The Israel Embassy Killings: Wrong in Every Way

    By Stephen R. ShalomMay 29, 2025

    Antisemitism versus Anti-Zionism

    By Stephen R. ShalomNovember 13, 2024

    Does Israel Have the Right to Defend Itself?

    By Stephen R. ShalomOctober 30, 2024

    Punishing the Democrats: Is This the Best Way to Oppose a Genocidal War?

    By Stephen R. ShalomOctober 24, 2024

    Shawn Fain for VP!

    By Stephen R. Shalom, Michael Albert July 26, 2024

    How Should We Define Antisemitism?

    By Stephen R. ShalomJune 23, 2024

    Background To The Gaza Crisis

    By Stephen R. Shalom, Michael Albert October 28, 2023

    I’m a Longtime NJ Peace Activist — and I Support Ukraine

    By Stephen R. ShalomApril 6, 2023

    What are the Lessons of Vietnam for Ukraine Today?

    By Stephen R. Shalom, Dan La Botz January 24, 2023

    In Ukraine’s Just War of Self-defense, Zelensky Must Still Respect Rights

    By Stephen R. ShalomNovember 22, 2022

    The Progressive Letter on Ukraine: Some Questions & Answers

    By Stephen R. ShalomNovember 5, 2022

    When Governments Kill Civilians

    By Stephen R. ShalomOctober 29, 2022

    When Governments Kill Civilans

    By Stephen R. ShalomOctober 27, 2022

    21st Century Revolution: A Review

    By Stephen R. ShalomOctober 10, 2022
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube Reddit Discord RSS

    Topic

    • Activism
    • Ecology
    • Economy
    • Feminism/Gender
    • International Relations
    • Media
    • Life After Capitalism
    • Parecon
    • Parsoc
    • Parpolity
    • Politics/Gov.
    • Race/Community
    • Vision/Strategy

    Place

    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America
    • Middle East
    • Venezuela

    Type

    • Article
    • Video
    • Podcasts
    • Debate
    • Interview
    • Review
    • Commentary
    • Z Magazine
    • Z Original

    About

    • Mission Statement
    • Z Staff
    • Z Friends
    • Editorial Philosophy
    • Submissions
    • Support Our Work
    • Contact

    Subscribe

    All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

    Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

    Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

    We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

    SUPPORT OUR WORK
    ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

    CRITICAL ACTION

    Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

    If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

    • CRITICAL ACTION WEBSITE
    Instagram Tiktok Youtube Twitter Facebook

    Subscribe

    All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

    No Paywalls. No Billionaires.
    Just People Power.

    Z Needs Your Help!

    ZNetwork reached millions, published 800 originals, and amplified movements worldwide in 2024 – all without ads, paywalls, or corporate funding. Read our annual report here.

    Now, we need your support to keep radical, independent media growing in 2025 and beyond. Every donation helps us build vision and strategy for liberation.

    CONTRIBUTE

    Subscribe

    Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

    WORLD PREMIERE - You Said You Wanted A Fight By CRITICAL ACTION

    Watch

    Sign In or Register

    Welcome Back!

    Login below or Register Now.

    Lost password?

    Register Now!

    Already registered? Login.

    A password will be e-mailed to you.