All around us things are falling apart. Collectively, Americans are experiencing national and imperial decline. Can America save itself? Is this country, as presently constituted, even worth saving?
For me, that last question is radical indeed. From my early years, I believed deeply in the idea of America. I knew this country wasnāt perfect, of course, not even close. Long before theĀ 1619 Project, I was aware of the āoriginal sinā of slavery and how central it was to our history. I also knew about the genocide of Native Americans. (As a teenager, my favorite movie ā and so it remains ā wasĀ Little Big Man, which pulled no punches when it came to the white man and his insatiably murderous greed.)
Nevertheless, America still promised much, or so I believed in the 1970s and 1980s. Life here was simply better, hands down, than in places like the Soviet Union and Mao Zedongās China. Thatās why we had to ācontainā communism ā to keepĀ themĀ overĀ there, so they could never invade our country and extinguish our lamp of liberty. And thatās why I joined Americaās Cold War military, serving in the Air Force from the presidency of Ronald Reagan to that of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. And believe me, it proved quite a ride. It taught this retired lieutenant colonel that theĀ skyās anything but the limit.
In the end, 20 years in the Air Force led me to turn away from empire,Ā militarism, and nationalism. I found myself seeking instead some antidote to the mainstream mediaās celebrations of American exceptionalism and the exaggerated version ofĀ victory cultureĀ that went with it (long after victory itself was in short supply). IĀ started writingĀ against the empire and its disastrous wars and found likeminded people atĀ TomDispatchĀ ā former imperial operatives turned incisive critics likeĀ Chalmers JohnsonĀ andĀ Andrew Bacevich, along with sharp-eyed journalistĀ Nick TurseĀ and, of course, the irreplaceable Tom Engelhardt, the founder of those ātomgramsā meant to alert America and the world to the dangerous folly of repeated U.S. global military interventions.
But this isnāt a plug forĀ TomDispatch. Itās a plug for freeing your mind as much as possible from theĀ thoroughly militarizedĀ matrix that pervades America. That matrix drives imperialism, waste, war, and global instability to the point where, in the context of the conflict in Ukraine, the risk of nuclear Armageddon could imaginably approach that of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. As wars ā proxy or otherwise ā continue, Americaās global network of 750-odd military bases never seems to decline. Despite upcoming cuts to domestic spending, just about no one in Washington imagines Pentagon budgets doing anything but growing, even soaring toward the trillion-dollar level, with militarized programsĀ accounting for 62%Ā of federal discretionary spending in 2023.
Indeed, an engorged Pentagon ā its budget for 2024 is expected to rise toĀ $886 billionĀ in the bipartisan debt-ceiling deal reached by President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy ā guarantees one thing: a speedier fall for the American empire. Chalmers JohnsonĀ predicted it; Andrew BacevichĀ analyzed it. The biggest reason is simple enough: incessant, repetitive, disastrous wars and costly preparations for more of the same have been sapping Americaās physical and mental reserves, as past wars did the reserves of previous empires throughout history. (Think of the short-lived Napoleonic empire, for example.)
Known as āthe arsenal of democracyā during World War II, America has now simply become an arsenal, with aĀ military-industrial-congressionalĀ complex intent on forging and feeding wars rather than seeking to starve and stop them. The result: a precipitous decline in the countryās standing globally, while at home Americans pay a steep price of accelerating violence (2023 will easilyĀ set a recordĀ for mass shootings) and ācarnageā (Donald Trumpās word) in a once proud but nowĀ much-bloodiedĀ āhomeland.ā
Lessons from History on Imperial Decline
Iām a historian, so please allow me to share a few basic lessons Iāve learned. When I taught World War I to cadets at the Air Force Academy, I would explain how the horrific costs of that war contributed to the collapse of four empires: Czarist Russia, the German Second Reich, the Ottoman empire, and the Austro-Hungarian empire of the Habsburgs. Yet even the āwinners,ā like the French and British empires, were also weakened by the enormity of what was, above all, a brutal European civil war, even if it spilled over into Africa, Asia, and indeed the Americas.
And yet after that war ended in 1918, peace proved elusive indeed, despite the Treaty of Versailles, among other abortive agreements. There was too much unfinished business, too much belief in the power of militarism, especially in an emergent Third Reich in Germany and in Japan, which had embraced ruthless European military methods to create its own Asiatic sphere of dominance. Scores needed to be settled, so the Germans and Japanese believed, and military offensives were the way to do it.
As a result, civil war in Europe continued with World War II, even as Japan showed that Asiatic powers could similarly embrace and deploy the unwisdom of unchecked militarism and war. The result:Ā 75 million deadĀ and more empires shattered, including Mussoliniās āNew Rome,ā a āthousand-yearā German Reich that barely lasted 12 of them before being utterly destroyed, and an Imperial Japan that was starved, burnt out, and finally nuked. China, devastated by war with Japan, also found itself ripped apart by internal struggles between nationalists and communists.
As with its prequel, even most of the āwinnersā of World War II emerged in a weakened state. In defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union had lost 25 to 30 million people. Its response was to erect, in Winston Churchillās phrase, an āIron Curtainā behind which it could exploit the peoples of Eastern Europe in a militarized empire that ultimately collapsed due to its wars and its own internal divisions. Yet the USSR lasted longer than the post-war French and British empires. France, humiliated by its rapid capitulation to the Germans in 1940, fought to reclaim wealth and glory in āFrenchā Indochina, only to be severely humbled atĀ Dien Bien Phu. Great Britain, exhausted from its victory, quickly lost India, that ājewelā in its imperial crown, and then Egypt in theĀ Suez debacle.
There was, in fact, only one country, one empire, that truly āwonā World War II: the United States, which had been the least touched (Pearl Harbor aside) by war and all its horrors. That seemingly never-ending European civil war from 1914 to 1945, along with Japanās immolation and Chinaās implosion, left the U.S. virtually unchallenged globally. America emerged from those wars as a superpower precisely because its government had astutely backed the winning side twice, tipping the scales in the process, while paying a relatively low price in blood and treasure compared to allies like the Soviet Union, France, and Britain.
Historyās lesson for Americaās leaders should have been all too clear: when you wage war long, especially when you devote significant parts of your resources ā financial, material, and especially personal ā to it, you wage it wrong. Not for nothing is war depicted in the Bible as one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse. France had lost its empire in World War II; it just took later military catastrophes in Algeria and Indochina to make it obvious. That was similarly true of Britainās humiliations in India, Egypt, and elsewhere, while the Soviet Union, which had lost much of its imperial vigor in that war, would take decades of slow rot and overstretch in places like Afghanistan to implode.
Meanwhile, the United States hummed along, denying it was an empire at all, even as it adopted so many of the trappings of one. In fact, in the wake of the implosion of the Soviet Union in 1991, Washingtonās leaders would declare AmericaĀ theĀ exceptional āsuperpower,ā a new and far more enlightened Rome and āthe indispensable nationā on planet Earth. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, its leaders would confidently launch what they termed a Global War on Terror and begin waging wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere, as in the previous century they had in Vietnam. (No learning curve there, it seems.) In the process, its leaders imagined a country that would remain untouched by warās ravages, which was we now know ā or do we? ā the height of imperial hubris and folly.
For whether you call it fascism, as with Nazi Germany, communism, as with Stalinās Soviet Union, or democracy, as with the United States, empires built on dominance achieved through a powerful, expansionist military necessarily become ever more authoritarian, corrupt, and dysfunctional. Ultimately, they are fated to fail. No surprise there, since whatever else such empires may serve, they donāt serve their own people. Their operatives protect themselves at any cost, while attacking efforts at retrenchment or demilitarization as dangerously misguided, if not seditiously disloyal.
Thatās why those likeĀ Chelsea Manning,Ā Edward Snowden, andĀ Daniel Hale, who shined a light on the empireāsĀ militarized crimesĀ and corruption, found themselves imprisoned, forced into exile, or otherwise silenced. Even foreign journalists likeĀ Julian AssangeĀ can be caught up in the empireās dragnet and imprisoned if they dare expose its war crimes. The empire knows how to strike back and will readily betray its own justice system (most notably in the case of Assange), including the hallowed principles of free speech and the press, to do so.
Perhaps he will eventually be freed, likely as not when the empire judges heās approaching deathās door. His jailing and torture have already served their purpose. Journalists know that to expose Americaās bloodied tools of empire brings only harsh punishment, not plush rewards. Best to look away or mince oneās words rather than risk prison ā or worse.
Yet you canāt fully hide the reality that this countryās failed wars have added trillions of dollars to its national debt, even as military spending continues to explode in the most wasteful ways imaginable, while the social infrastructure crumbles.
Clinging Bitterly to Guns and Religion
Today, America clings ever more bitterly to guns and religion. If that phrase sounds familiar, it might be because Barack ObamaĀ used itĀ in the 2008 presidential campaign to describe the reactionary conservatism of mostly rural voters in Pennsylvania. Disillusioned by politics, betrayed by their putative betters, those voters, claimed the then-presidential candidate, clung to their guns and religion for solace. I lived in rural Pennsylvania at the time and recall a response from a fellow resident who basically agreed with Obama, for what else was there left to cling to in an empire that had abandoned its own rural working-class citizens?
Something similar is true of America writ large today. As an imperial power, we cling bitterly to guns and religion. By āguns,ā I mean all the weaponry AmericaāsĀ merchants of deathĀ sell to theĀ PentagonĀ and across the world. Indeed, weaponry is perhaps this countryās most influential global export, devastatingly so. From 2018 to 2022, the U.S. aloneĀ accounted for 40%Ā of global arms exports, a figure thatās only risen dramatically with military aid to Ukraine. And by āreligion,ā I mean a persistent belief in American exceptionalism (despite all evidence to the contrary), which increasingly draws sustenance from a militant Christianity that denies the very spirit of Christ and His teachings.
Yet history appears to confirm that empires, in their dying stages, do exactly that: they exalt violence, continue to pursue war, and insist on their own greatness until their fall can neither be denied nor reversed. Itās a tragic reality that the journalist Chris Hedges hasĀ written aboutĀ with considerable urgency.
The problem suggests its own solution (not that any powerful figure in Washington is likely to pursue it). America must stop clinging bitterly to its guns ā and here I donāt even mean theĀ nearly 400 million weaponsĀ in private hands in this country, including all those AR-15 semi-automatic rifles. By āguns,ā I mean all the militarized trappings of empire, including Americaās vast structure of overseas military bases and its staggering commitments to weaponry of all sorts, includingĀ world-ending nuclearĀ ones. As for clinging bitterly to religion ā and by āreligionā I mean the belief in Americaās own righteousness, regardless of the millions of people itās killed globally from theĀ VietnamĀ era to the present moment ā that, too, would have to stop.
Historyās lessons can be brutal. Empires rarely die well. After it became an empire, Rome never returned to being a republic and eventually fell to barbarian invasions. The collapse of Germanyās Second Reich bred a third one of greater virulence, even if it was of shorter duration. Only its utter defeat in 1945 finally convinced Germans that God didnāt march with their soldiers into battle.
What will it take to convince Americans to turn their backs on empire and war before itās too late? When will we conclude that Christ wasnāt joking when He blessed the peacemakers rather than the warmongers?
As an iron curtain descends on a failing American imperial state, one thing we wonāt be able to say is that we werenāt warned.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
