If there are two characteristics that really define Trumpism, they are a total disregard for the importance of facts and a nostalgia for a mythical, vaguelyĀ defined time of American āgreatness.ā That makes the Trump era ripe for Glenn Beckās ongoing project of creating and promoting his revisionist view of American history ā one that valorizes straight white men as humanityās natural leaders and grants Christian fundamentalism a centrality to American history that it does not, in reality, have.
Beck has been ramping up a program he runs with theĀ pseudo-historian David Barton to peddle Bartonās fake history version of American history.
In Bartonās history, the Founding Fathersā idea of government was rooted in fundamentalist Christianity, instead of Enlightenment philosophy, and the contributions of people of color are minimized in service of centering Christian white men as the righteous shepherds guiding everyone else. As Kyle Mantyla at Right Wing Watch reported, the latest move by Barton and Beck is a two-week program, forĀ $375 a head, that will teach their fake version of history to high school graduates before they head off to college so āthey can then set their ignorant professors straight on the ārealā history of America.ā
Beck isnāt subtle about his intention to give college professors headaches by filling their classrooms with fledging right-wing nuts spewing āalternative factsā about history. āYour kids will be challenged to go and find the documents to make the cases that theyāre most likely going to have to make in college with their professors,ā Beck said in his announcement. āI guarantee you the professors at college will have the wrong answer.ā
The āwrongā answers, in this case, being the actual facts of history.
Barton, whose historical views are the ones Beck is pushing here, is pretty shameless about making stuff upĀ if it suits his view that our country was meant to be a Christian theocracy and not a secular democracy. āFor example, in his version of history, the founding fathers āalready had the entire debate on creation and evolution,ā and chose creationism,ā explained the Southern Poverty Law Center profile of Barton. āReality check: Charles Darwin didnāt publish his theory of evolution in āThe Origin of Speciesā until 1859, more than half a century after the founding fathers were active.ā
This two-week program is part of a larger effort that Beck and Barton first proposed in 2012Ā for building a museum to market this fake version of history. That hasnāt quite happened, but theyāve cobbled together a pseudo-exhibit and a curriculum and are using those trappings to try to sneak Bartonās misinformation into high school and college courses.
If this sounds like the methods that Christian conservatives have been using to undermine the teaching of biology and to slip their views about creationism into classrooms, then congratulations on paying attention.
As Zack Kopplin ā who currently works as an investigator for the Government Accountability Project but who made his name exposing the sleazy tactics used by creationists to sneak their religious beliefs into public high schools ā argued in a phone conversation, Bartonās reactionary historical revisionism and creationism share a common root. Reactionaries like Beck and Barton āview this as a continuing existential crisis, that they are under threat from the secular, real history people that donāt want to teach that the Earth is 6,000 years old or that Moses created theĀ Constitution,ā Kopplin explained.
Some conservatives need toĀ put āstraight white menā at the ātop of [the food chain], top of history,ā Kopplin argued.Ā Evolutionary theory and fact-based history threaten the āhierarchical structure where theyāre at the top.ā
Evolution does this by threatening the view that God created man in his image, to rule over the Earth (and over women). History threatens this view by suggesting that white menās dominance is not the result of their natural superiority and inherent genius, but because systems of oppression that suppressed or erased the contributions of women and people of color.
Bartonās need to believe in this world where God created white men to be benevolent dictators can lead to some stunning moments of unvarnished racism. In 2011 on the Christian TV show āCelebration,ā Barton argued, āThatās why we said we want to separate from Britain, so we can end slavery.ā
This comment is so flatly false that it hardly needs debunking. It is, however, revealing of the white supremacist view propelling Barton. Rather than admit that chattel slavery is an evil that white people created and perpetuated, Barton treats it as if it had been just some unsourced evil, and that white men were actually the great heroes who put an end to it.
Bartonās all-consuming need to believe only white men are really capable of greatness has led him to make similar arguments about the civil rights movement. In 2010, he took part in an effort to rewrite Texas history book standards to erase the contributions of Thurgood Marshall, CĆ©sar ChĆ”vez and even Martin Luther King Jr.
āOnly majorities can expand political rights in Americaās constitutional society,ā Barton argued to reporters at the time.
In 2012 Bartonās tendency to talk utter nonsense finally caught up with him after the publication of his book, āThe Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths Youāve Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson,ā a work that should have just been called āThe Jefferson Lies,ā because lies, mostly to minimize Jeffersonās history of slaveholding, are what it was full of. A handful of conservative outlets finally turned on him and his publisher eventually recalled the book.
But none of this has stopped Beck from bolstering Bartonās career and trying to bamboozle as many people as possible into believing this alternative form of history. If anything, Beck has been Bartonās saving grace, as the efforts to start the museum and indoctrinate young people began right around the time Bartonās Jefferson book was being recalled.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate