Source: Consortium News
Congressās inability to actually represent the real-live human beings of America, combined with an economic system that rewards lack of empathy and an excess of greed, has brought us to a dark time when an oncoming tsunami of financial ruin, destitution and evictions towers over our heads, blocking out the sunlight.
The impending evictions may soon kick 28 million people/families out of their homes. To put that in perspective, only ten million people lost their homes during the 2008 economic crisis, and that was considered by anyone paying attention to be the craziest thing to ever happen.
What weāre facing now could be three times crazier, getting to Charlie Sheen levels. (I almost wrote āKanye West levelsā but everything he does is in hopes of being mentioned in the media, and Iām not falling for it. ā¦Shit. This parenthetical has betrayed me!)
To talk about the impending homelessness tsunami, we have to first get past the fact that our government could totally bail people out and keep them in their homes. Not only have they already bailed out big banks and Wall Street to the tune of $4.25 Trillion, but on top of that the Pentagon has over $21 Trillion of unaccounted-for adjustments on their books over the past 20 years. This is to say ā thereās plenty of money.
Money is an idea, a concept, an imaginary metaphysical belief, and itās high time we faced the fact that the U.S. government has an unlimited imagination. As philosopher Alan Watts once put it: Money is not a thing, itās a measurement. Saying thereās not enough money to do something is like a builder saying thereās not enough inches to build a house. He has the wood, nails and hammers. Heās just out of inches.
The U.S. government could easily give every American $2,000 a month for the foreseeable future, which would keep almost everybody in their homes and apartments. In fact, Canada has opted to give $2,000 a month to those who lost work because of the pandemic.
But ignore the fact that thereās enough money. Thatās not what weāre here to discuss.
There are also enough empty homes. As of 2018, there were nearly 1.5 million vacant homes in the country. Compare that to the estimated 553,742 people homeless on any given night. So even before the pandemic, there were three empty houses for every homeless person. Three. Thatās not even accounting for empty apartments, yachts, sheds, extra bedrooms, garages, condos, cubbyholes, attic spaces, basements, barns, pool houses, and walk-in refrigerators.
If those vacant locations were used to house the houseless, those of us lucky enough to have our own abodes wouldnāt hardly notice a difference except that homelessness would have vanished. It would be something we talk about in a āremember whenā fashion like VHS tapes, game shows about grocery shopping, and dating that didnāt involve blood tests and an Instagram audit.
No more people on the street, no more fear that a little bad luck would result in you or your family under a bridge giving a guy your underwear in exchange for a sandwich. All that utter madness would cease to exist.
And the impending number of evictionsā28 millionāisnāt even accounting for how many people stay in horrible relationships because they canāt afford a place of their own, both horrible marriages and other living arrangements. (Like a 25 year-old who has to live with his mom who cleans her feet on the couch every night while watching Wheel of Fortune and eating soup that smells of rotting raccoon carcass. Call me crazy, but in our post-scarcity world, that 25 year-old should be given an apartment.)
But letās back up even further and question the brain parasites we were given from our social engineering. Why should someone be homeless just because they donāt have enough money? Some would say indignantly, āBecause they didnāt work hard enough, so they deserve to be homeless. Thatās called āwork ethicā ā and itās what this countryās founded on! George Washington something something Ford Motor Company. Meh!ā
Okay, thatās a great point exceptāNo, itās not. How hard someone works doesnāt hardly matter in our society. Think for a moment about all the filthy rich trust-fund kids who sit around on their asses all day smoking weed out of the skull of an exotic lemur. Yet theyāre still rich. How many trophy wives or trophy husbands lounge by the pool eternally caressing their junk in the sunshine? They donāt work hard. How many superfluous āboard membersā get paid hundreds of thousands to sit on a board and attend one conference call a month?
Plus, consider people that actually do work for their fortunesālike a CEOādo you honestly believe they work a thousand times harder than a janitor or a dishwasher or a coal miner? Of course not. Whatās the hardest job in the world? Probably ripping asbestos out of a dilapidated sewage treatment plant in Phoenix, Arizona in 110-degree heat with improper safety equipment.
Do you think those guys get paid the highest salary in the world because they work the hardest? No! Theyāre lucky if they get dental. Theyāre lucky if their lunch break is long enough for a sandwich and a piss.
America is not based on hard work. Get it out of your head that this society is at all set up to be fair. Fair would be everyone with a roof over their head. Fair would be every kid getting a solid education. Fair would be every person drinking delicious clean water. Fair is the opposite of whatever the hell weāre doing here.
But very little of this discussion exists in our culture. Instead the banks and landlords are preparing to kick 28 million families out. And itās not like the bank will resell all those homes during the impending depression lathered in pandemic. Nope. Those homes will sit empty, just like the 10 million foreclosed homes during the 2008 Great Recession sat empty for months if not years. So the reason for kicking people out is simply to⦠um⦠make sure theyāre homeless? How can that make sense?
If the goal is to have a good, functioning society, itās completely illogical to kick people out of their shelters. The families will be devastated. The kids will be traumatized. Divorces will occur. Suicides. Addiction. Overdoses. None of that is good for society. None of that helps America even slightly. So the truly patriotic thing to do is demand housing for all.
Whatās good for society is to have people comfortable in their homes, able to get educated and grow as humans. What ever happened to the pursuit of human growth for every individual?
Some may argue, āWe canāt let people stay in their homes because we need to teach them personal responsibility.ā Thatās the argument every vomit-brained Fox News guest spits out reflexively. Yet itās impossible to be responsible for something no one saw coming. Did anyone see this pandemic coming? Did anyone including the government prepare for it?
No. In fact weāve bailed out whole industries, the airline industry for one. Billions of dollars just handed to them. How are the heads of the airlines any different from a homeowner who lost her job in the pandemic? Thereās no difference. Shouldnāt the airline CEOs be the ones evictedāleft out on the street sleeping in a box?
On top of all thisāand this point is really going to blow a hole through your pantsāitās cheaper to keep people in their homes. For example, according to The Washington Post, āUtah was spending on average $20,000 on each chronically homeless person. So, to in part cut those costs ā but also to āsave lives,ā ā¦the state started setting up each chronically homeless person with his or her own house.ā
It worked. By 2015, they cut homelessness by 91 percent and saved the state money. However, since then, homelessness has gone back up. Itās tough to say why, but one director of a Utah food pantry said, āThe mistake we made was stopping [the program].ā
Yeah, that may have been the reason. Utah lawmakers found out how to end homelessnessā¦. and then they stopped doing that! (Why in this country do we run screaming from every great idea like itās a hive of angry bees that all want to talk to us about life insurance??)
So here, alas, are the solutions. Housing should be a human right. We have enough homes. We have enough materials. We have enough dollars and enough inches. It doesnāt need to be a goddamn mansion, but everyone should have a roof over their heads and four good walls. Hell, Iāll even compromiseātwo and a half good walls.
Even if we didnāt have enough homes, which we do, we can now 3D print a house in a matter of hours. (Although it must suck when the printer jams. All those houses stuck together in the tray.)
Point is, donāt tell me we donāt have enough houses and apartments for everyone. Paris Hiltonās dogs have a fucking $325,000 mansion! Iām not kidding. Just for the dogs. Thatās, shall we say, mildly upsetting. (Let me guess ā those dogs worked hard to get where they are.)
The next solution is to fight the impending evictions. Donāt let the authorities kick your friends and neighbors onto the street. We have a strong (suppressed) history in this country of fighting against landlords and the cruelty of evictions, such as the great Rent Strike War of 1932 in the Bronx, and the Chicago Eviction Riots of 1931.
Fighting back is not just an option, itās an obligation. If youāre strong enough to resist the profit-centered social engineering we are fed every day of our lives, then you will soon realize housing should be a human right.
Lee Camp is the host of the hit comedy news show āRedacted Tonight.ā His new book āBullet Points and Punch Linesā is available at LeeCampBook.com and his stand-up comedy special can be streamed for free at LeeCampAmerican.com.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate