It had been 15 years since the U.S. invaded Iraq when, on March 19, 2018, the celebrated Iraqi novelist and poet Sinan Antoon published a blisteringĀ op-edĀ inĀ The New York Times. He took readers through his observations of the steady deterioration of Iraqi society since the war began, but the most scathing words came toward the end.
āNo one knows for certain how many Iraqis have died as a result of the invasion 15 years ago,ā Antoon wrote. āSome credible estimates put the number at more than one million. You can read that sentence again. The invasion of Iraq is often spoken of in the United States as a āblunder,ā or even a ācolossal mistake.ā It was a crime. Those who perpetrated it are still at large.ā
That the invasion was not just a moral catastrophe but an egregiousĀ war crimeĀ has been echoed by everyone fromĀ United Nations headsĀ toĀ human rights leaders. According to Brown Universityās Costs of War project,Ā over 300,000Ā people died in the war, the overwhelming bulk of them Iraqi civilians. These are only the counted: civilian deaths are certainly muchĀ higher. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis continue to suffer from a decades-longĀ publicĀ andĀ mental healthĀ calamity. AroundĀ 9.2 million Iraqis have been displaced.
The war fractured any cohesion across Iraq and set the stage for massive levels of sectarian violenceĀ fueledĀ by the U.S. Accounts of massacres like those inĀ MukaradeebĀ andĀ HadithaĀ and torture chambers likeĀ Abu GhraibĀ only touch the surface of theĀ crimesĀ committed against Iraqis.
With the 20th anniversary of the invasion now approaching, the sanitizing of the warās major culprits ā or, at the very least, the soft forgetting of their crimes ā continues.
George W. Bush, the warās ultimate āDecider,ā now smacks of the pre-Trump āgood old daysā forĀ some liberals. (āA year ago, I watched Mr. Bush on āThe Ellen DeGeneres Show,ā dancing and talking about his paintings,ā Antoon wrote). Dick Cheney has aged quietly at hisĀ Wyoming ranch, enjoying theĀ tens of millions of dollarsĀ he raked in as Halliburton CEO before he was elected vice president in 2000 and went on ā by all accounts ā to coax an invasion and occupation where the military and oilfield services giant took in inĀ nearlyĀ $40 billion in federal contracts.
As the very top decision-makers faded into retirement, the next layer of war pushers, enablers and overseers ā the top defense and national security officials and the celebrity generals ā went on to profit immensely following their leadership of an illegal war, darting through the revolving door to snag coveted corporate board seats and prestigious university appointments.
Many of them remain in these positions with defense industry giants, tech firms and Wall Street investors today, enjoying the good life, raking in consulting and speaker fees, their images washed as they profit handsomely from the insider access they provide.
Turn War Crimes Into Corporate Board Seats
Take Paul Wolfowitz, widely seen as one of the warās key architects, who in 2013 wasĀ appointedĀ to the board of tech company LaserLock ā nowĀ VerifyMeĀ ā and raked inĀ 2 million sharesĀ of company stock in 2013. A year before, he wasĀ appointedĀ to the Strategic Advisory Council of NGP Energy Capital Management, an energy-focused private equity firm that oversees billions in oil and gas investments and isĀ partneredĀ with private equity behemoth andĀ war profiteer, the Carlyle Group.
Then thereās George Tenet, who directed the CIA during the invasion of Iraq,Ā skewingĀ intelligence to push for war. AfterĀ leavingĀ the CIA in 2004, Tenet wasted little time jumping onto defense tech corporate boards likeĀ L-1 Identity Solutions,Ā Guidance SoftwareĀ andĀ QinetiQ GroupĀ that cash in from government contracts. Tenet currently serves on the board of defense tech companyĀ In-Q-TelĀ ā initiallyĀ charteredĀ as a venture capital arm of the CIA ā and isĀ chairmanĀ of theĀ secretiveĀ private investment firm Allen & Company.
William Hartung, a senior researchĀ fellowĀ with the Quincy Institute and author ofĀ Prophets of War: Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military-Industrial Complex, toldĀ TruthoutĀ that the revolving door between the Pentagon and corporate America creates major conflicts of interest.
āWhen government officials are looking ahead towards getting into the industry and cashing in, I think they go lighter on corporations,ā he said. āTheyāre looking ahead towards their future employer, instead of what should be their current responsibilities.ā Once they land those corporate positions, ātheyāve got a special line to their former colleaguesā and āget easier audiences.ā
āThey know how the process works and how to manipulate it,ā said Hartung.
Secretary of State Colin Powell played a pivotal role in the destruction of Iraq. Perhaps personally skeptical of the case for the invasion, Powell nevertheless lent his considerable prestige and credibility to paving the way for war, most notoriously in his February 2003Ā briefingĀ to the United Nations.
But Powell, who died in 2021, suffered little financial fallout from his crucial role in enabling an illegal war. Instead, he went on to rake in millions as a director of Bloom Energy andĀ Salesforce. For example, Bloom Energyās 2018Ā proxy statementĀ shows that Powell took in $1.9 million in compensation while also enjoying a $125,000 consulting gig with the company, all in addition to theĀ $5 millionĀ in company stock he purchased. Powell took in $571,915 inĀ 2020Ā alone as a Salesforce director. On top of all this, heĀ servedĀ as partner and adviser to a range of private equity and venture capital firms.
Then thereās Stephen Hadley, who helpedĀ propelĀ the invasion forward as deputy national security adviser. After he left office, Hadley raked in millions over a decade as a director of arms giant Raytheon, publishing hawkish, pro-warĀ op-edsĀ without disclosing his financial ties to the defense industry.
Corporate Consulting, Speaker Fees and Celebrity Photo-Ops
After the war, Hadley also went into business with the first in command at the National Security Council, Condoleezza Rice. Together they formed the private consulting service,Ā Rice, Hadley, Gates & Manuel. The firmĀ leveragesĀ its partnersā government connections and global networks to benefit corporate and government clients, largely unseen by the public eye.
This is a common move among top defense and security officials who leave office: form opaque, for-profit firms that rake in undisclosed millions. Itās not just Hadley and Rice: everyone from Henry Kissinger to Madeleine Albright has done it (Hadley and Riceās co-partner isĀ Robert Gates, who served as defense secretary under both Bush and Obama).
Hartung says these consulting firms may offer a cover for lobbying. āThey have a certain advantage because of the lack of transparency,ā he said. āIf theyāre labeled as lobbyists, they would at least have to make some disclosures. But if they define themselves as giving āstrategic advice,ā then they can skirt that whole system.ā
Before becoming Bushās national security adviser and then secretary of state during the lead-up to the invasion and the first half-decade of war and occupation, Rice held a slew of corporate board seats, including at Chevron, whichĀ even namedĀ an oil tanker after her. Since she left office in 2009, Rice has maintained her ability to profit big from the private sector. In addition to her consulting gig, sheās nabbed board seats atĀ Dropbox,Ā Makena Capital,Ā KiORĀ andĀ C3 AIĀ (the latter of which netted herĀ $340,000Ā in 2022 alone), not to mention a seat onĀ JPMorganās International Council.
If the millions Rice has made from consulting and corporate board seats hasnāt been enough, sheās also raked in a small fortune on the speaker circuit, reportedly earningĀ $150,000Ā for a speech at the University of Minnesota, one of many lectures sheās given fromĀ PepperdineĀ toĀ PurdueĀ toĀ corporate gatherings.
Twenty years afterĀ loyally servingĀ Bush and Cheneyās march to war, Riceās image has been fully rehabilitated:Ā modelingĀ for the NFL, speaking at liberal campuses, enjoying accolades as a newĀ part-ownerĀ of the Denver Broncos, serving as American Academy of Arts & SciencesĀ Fellow, and now running the prestigious conservativeĀ Hoover Institute.
The Generalsā Profit
If the top Bush administration civilian officials steered the U.S. into the war, the top generals who willingly executed the invasion and subsequent occupation have also gone on to personally benefit, as have the corporations that pay big to access the generalsā influence and connections.
Take Tommy Franks, the commanding general of the 2003 invasion, who beginning in 2005Ā snaggedĀ lucrative board seats with Bank of America (owner of the Outback Steakhouse and other chains) and CEC Entertainment (more commonly known as Chuck E. Cheese).
But most top generals didnāt move on to oversee kidsā restaurants: they joinedĀ top weapons companiesĀ that paid them hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in cash and stock to tap into their unrivaled access to the Pentagon and military.
Gen. Raymond OdiernoĀ ledĀ the 4th Infantry Division into Iraq after the invasion, where it was known for its ārough methodsā that included ābreaking down the doors of private homes and grabbing young Iraqi men off the street and delivering them to the notorious Abu Ghraib prison,ā according to theĀ Washington Post. He later became the chief commander in Iraq and the Armyās top general. OdiernoĀ joinedĀ the board of weapons manufacturer Honeywell shortly before he died in 2021.
James āMad Dogā Mattis, who commanded the 1st Marine Division during the invasion andĀ oversawĀ massacres in Fallujah and the wedding bombing in Mukaradeeb, joined the board of General Dynamics not once butĀ twice, with a stint as Donald Trumpās defense secretary in between.
After serving as commanding general of U.S. forces in Iraq and then commander of all U.S. military operations in the Middle East and Afghanistan, Lloyd AustinĀ retiredĀ in 2016 and soon joined the board of defense company powerhouse United Technologies, and then the board of Raytheon after it acquired United Technologies (he also joined the boards of steel powerhouse Nucor and health care giant Tenet). Austin was also part of the Pine Island Capital PartnersĀ team, aĀ defense industryĀ investment firm.
Austin then quickly scurried back the other way through the revolving door to become President Bidenās defense secretary in 2021. AustinĀ estimatedĀ heād cash out his Raytheon stock for anywhere between $750,000 and $1.7 million when he joined the administration.
āTheyāre there to use their influence on behalf of the company ā to knock on the doors of members of Congress, to use phones, email, or other communications to put the arm on people that can help the firm,ā said Hartung.
āI think for the company, itās about buying that reputational value as well as their contacts.ā For the generals, he added, itās a ādubious ethical situation.ā
āTheyāre going to the companies that profited from these wars, and then themselves profiting from working for this company,ā said Hartung. āIām sure they have all kinds of rationales about national security and protecting the country, but that doesnāt change the fact that theyāre profiting from the system.ā
David Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division during the invasion and later became the top commander in Iraq and Afghanistan. He rose up even further to lead the CIA, only to resign amid scandal after heĀ leakedĀ classified information to his biographer with whom he was having an affair.
But none of this stopped Petraeus from joining theĀ boardĀ of KKR, one of the worldās top private equity companies, and serving as chairman of theĀ KKR Global Institute, using his global network and know-how to advance the interests of Wall Street billionaires likeĀ Henry Kravis.
Petraeus has also enjoyed a slew of postwar cozy university appointments atĀ CUNY,Ā Harvard,Ā USCĀ andĀ Yale, though not always without protest (CUNY students, for instance, suffered arrests to oppose their schoolās sanitizing of a āwar criminalā).
But when it comes to universities, Petraeus is not alone. Architects and overseers of the Iraq War ā from neocon Douglas Feith atĀ GeorgetownĀ to Condoleezza Rice atĀ StanfordĀ to Stanley McChrystal atĀ YaleĀ ā have all benefited from reputational burnishing by the Ivory Tower, whose provosts and deans are always eager for greater access to the corridors of influence.
Beyond universities, nonprofits ranging from theĀ Aspen InstituteĀ to theĀ Boys & Girls ClubĀ of America, as much spaces for elite networking and corporate image-washing as they are mission-driven, have welcomed the warās architects with open arms.
To be sure, itās a slippery slope in trying to name responsibility for the war. We havenāt even broached the Democratic establishment here, nor the many influential liberal pundits whoĀ greasedĀ public opinion with their fantasies of āliberatingā Iraq.
Again, the words of Sinan Antoon: āIt was a crime. Those who perpetrated it are still at large.ā
At large, and we should add, living lavishly, thanks to the corporations who splurge to benefit from their blood-soaked connections and the universities that shuffle them into their storied lecture halls and swanky cocktail parties.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
Donate
