As Nicolás Maduro is sworn in for a new presidential term on January 10, Washington is bound to ratchet up its campaign to isolate Venezuela politically and economically. A few days earlier, U.S. Congressional Representatives belonging to the Democratic Party – with somewhat of a new face – initiated their term 2019-2021. Its Progressive Caucus now has 98 congressional members, by far the party’s largest.
If the Progressive Caucus were to place the issue of Venezuela on the table for discussion as part of its critique of the policies of the Trump Administration, it would be doing a great service to the campaign against the illegal financial sanctions that have caused so much suffering to the people of Venezuela. In particular, Bernie Sanders, who needs to assume bold and principled positions as he did in 2016 to differentiate himself from other Democratic politicians with presidential ambitions, would do well to take up the issue.
Of course, Sanders and other Democrats cannot – even if they wanted to – use the arguments employed by those further to their left. If Sanders were to point to the progressive policies initiated by Hugo Chávez which Maduro has retained – such as his nationalistic foreign policies and social programs empowering the poor – the Democratic National Committee aided by the mainstream media would show Sanders to the party ‘s door.
So if Sanders were to take up the issue, how would he respond to the predictable objections from the media as well as political adversaries to his right? The following are the politically-charged questions which Sanders would likely get from the press, along with his possible responses.
ຫນັງສືພິມ. You oppose sanctions against the Maduro dictatorship, but you support measures against Saudi Arabia for the brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi. Isn’t that contradictory, if not hypocritical?
Sanders. No one in Washington is talking about regime change in the case of Saudi Arabia. That’s up to the Saudi people. In the case of Venezuela that’s what the sanctions are all about: getting rid of Maduro. If there’s anything hypocritical, it’s Washington’s activism in favor of regime change of governments we don’t like, while maintaining friendly relations with others which are anything but democratic. To make matters worse, we provide generous amounts of aid, including military aid, to those same regimes.
ຫນັງສືພິມ. Are you opposed to trying to remove an unpopular regime?
Sanders. I wouldn’t say it’s out of the question, but history shows that such a strategy needs to be carefully thought out because the results have often been disastrous. One factor that has to be taken into account is whether there is a united opposition with recognized credibility that can take over and maintain stability. That certainly wasn’t the case in Libya and Syria. And it doesn’t seem to be the case in Venezuela. The Venezuelan opposition is divided between those who favor participation in elections and those who oppose it, between those who support a military option and those who are against it. Furthermore, some of the opposition parties have lost credibility because they went so quickly from backing demonstrations to oust Maduro, which resulted in scores of deaths, to participating in elections. I am told that many of those who are adamantly opposed to Maduro are also extremely skeptical of the opposition.
ຫນັງສືພິມ: But shouldn’t Maduro be placed in the same category as that of the Saudi government and other brutal dictatorial regime?
Sanders. First, let me make clear, I am no defender of the Maduro government. But it seems to me that distinctions need to be made. Khashoggi was murdered even though he wasn’t leading a movement to overthrow the government. In fact, he was a moderate. While police brutality has to be condemned regardless of circumstances – and there’s been plenty of it in Venezuela under Maduro – nevertheless, the context has to be considered. In the protests in Venezuela there has been extremes on both sides. Six national guardsmen and two policemen were killed in the protests in 2014 calling for regime change. What would happen here in the U.S. if protesters attempting to overthrow the government killed policemen? Venezuela and Saudi Arabia are separate cases and have to be considered separately.
ຫນັງສືພິມ. Then the U.S. should turn a blind eye to what is happening in Venezuela? Are you an isolationist?
Sanders. Definitely not. I think Washington should play an active role in its relations with Venezuela, but of a different nature. The prime minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez, is no buddy of Maduro, but he has stated that he wants Spain to help broker negotiations between both sides in Venezuela and reach a consensus as to what needs to be done. Venezuela is in a crisis-type situation economically and no side has magical answer for getting the country out of it. Only through some kind of consensus can the country move forward. If that doesn’t happen Venezuelans of all classes and political persuasions will suffer and they will continue to leave the country, thus aggravating instability throughout the region. We have to think of an effective approach to reverse this trend. Trump’s policy of sanctions, threats of military intervention and support for a military coup has been anything but effective.
These, in short, are arguments that Bernie Sanders and other members of the Progressive Caucus can use to counter the inevitable barrage of attacks that any opposition to sanctions on the Hill will invite. Fear of facing these issues has made criticism of U.S. policy toward Venezuela virtually taboo, even for bold politicians like Sanders. Given the major blunders in U.S. foreign policy over the recent past, revision and debate are in order. Specifically, in the case of Venezuela, the issue of international sanctions needs to be placed on the table.
ກະລຸນາຊ່ວຍ ZNet ແລະ Z Magazine
ເນື່ອງຈາກບັນຫາກັບການຂຽນໂປຼແກຼມຂອງພວກເຮົາທີ່ພວກເຮົາມີພຽງແຕ່ໃນປັດຈຸບັນສຸດທ້າຍສາມາດແກ້ໄຂໄດ້, ມັນເປັນເວລາຫຼາຍກວ່າຫນຶ່ງປີນັບຕັ້ງແຕ່ການລະດົມທຶນຄັ້ງສຸດທ້າຍຂອງພວກເຮົາ. ດັ່ງນັ້ນ, ພວກເຮົາຕ້ອງການຄວາມຊ່ວຍເຫຼືອຈາກເຈົ້າຫຼາຍກວ່າທີ່ເຄີຍມີເພື່ອສືບຕໍ່ນໍາເອົາຂໍ້ມູນທາງເລືອກທີ່ທ່ານຊອກຫາມາເປັນເວລາ 30 ປີ.
Z ສະເຫນີຂ່າວສັງຄົມທີ່ເປັນປະໂຫຍດທີ່ສຸດທີ່ພວກເຮົາສາມາດເຮັດໄດ້, ແຕ່ໃນການຕັດສິນສິ່ງທີ່ເປັນປະໂຫຍດ, ບໍ່ເຫມືອນກັບແຫຼ່ງອື່ນໆຈໍານວນຫຼາຍທີ່ພວກເຮົາເນັ້ນຫນັກໃສ່ວິໄສທັດ, ຍຸດທະສາດ, ແລະຄວາມກ່ຽວຂ້ອງຂອງນັກເຄື່ອນໄຫວ. ເມື່ອພວກເຮົາເວົ້າກັບ Trump, ຕົວຢ່າງ, ມັນແມ່ນການຊອກຫາວິທີທາງນອກເຫນືອ Trump, ບໍ່ພຽງແຕ່ເວົ້າຄືນ, ເລື້ອຍໆ, ລາວຂີ້ຮ້າຍປານໃດ. ແລະອັນດຽວກັນກໍເປັນຈິງສຳລັບການແກ້ໄຂບັນຫາໂລກຮ້ອນ, ຄວາມທຸກຍາກ, ຄວາມບໍ່ສະເໝີພາບ, ການແບ່ງແຍກເຊື້ອຊາດ, ການມີເພດສຳພັນ, ແລະ ການເຮັດສົງຄາມ. ບູລິມະສິດຂອງພວກເຮົາສະເຫມີວ່າສິ່ງທີ່ພວກເຮົາສະຫນອງມີທ່າແຮງສໍາລັບການຊ່ວຍກໍານົດສິ່ງທີ່ຕ້ອງເຮັດ, ແລະວິທີການທີ່ດີທີ່ສຸດທີ່ຈະເຮັດມັນ.
ໃນການແກ້ໄຂບັນຫາການຂຽນໂປລແກລມຂອງພວກເຮົາ, ພວກເຮົາໄດ້ປັບປຸງລະບົບຂອງພວກເຮົາເພື່ອເຮັດໃຫ້ກາຍເປັນຜູ້ສະຫນັບສະຫນູນແລະການບໍລິຈາກງ່າຍຂຶ້ນ. ມັນເປັນຂະບວນການທີ່ຍາວນານແຕ່ພວກເຮົາຫວັງວ່າມັນຈະເຮັດໃຫ້ມັນສະດວກຫຼາຍສໍາລັບທຸກຄົນທີ່ຈະຊ່ວຍໃຫ້ພວກເຮົາຂະຫຍາຍຕົວ. ຖ້າທ່ານມີບັນຫາໃດໆ, ກະລຸນາແຈ້ງໃຫ້ພວກເຮົາຮູ້ທັນທີ. ພວກເຮົາຕ້ອງການການປ້ອນຂໍ້ມູນໃສ່ບັນຫາຕ່າງໆເພື່ອໃຫ້ແນ່ໃຈວ່າລະບົບສາມາດສືບຕໍ່ນຳໃຊ້ໄດ້ງ່າຍສຳລັບທຸກຄົນ.
ວິທີທີ່ດີທີ່ສຸດທີ່ຈະຊ່ວຍ, ແນວໃດກໍ່ຕາມ, ແມ່ນເພື່ອກາຍເປັນຜູ້ສະຫນັບສະຫນູນປະຈໍາເດືອນຫຼືປະຈໍາປີ. ຜູ້ສະຫນັບສະຫນູນສາມາດສະແດງຄວາມຄິດເຫັນ, ໂພດ blogs, ແລະໄດ້ຮັບຄໍາຄິດຄໍາເຫັນໃນຕອນກາງຄືນໂດຍອີເມລ໌ໂດຍກົງ.
ນອກນັ້ນທ່ານຍັງສາມາດບໍລິຈາກຄັ້ງດຽວຫຼືໄດ້ຮັບການສະຫມັກພິມເພື່ອ Z ວາລະສານ.
ຈອງ Z Magazine ທີ່ນີ້.
ການຊ່ວຍເຫຼືອໃດໆກໍ່ຈະຊ່ວຍໄດ້ຢ່າງຫຼວງຫຼາຍ. ແລະກະລຸນາອີເມຂອງຄໍາແນະນໍາສໍາລັບການປັບປຸງ, ຄໍາຄິດເຫັນ, ຫຼືບັນຫາໃນທັນທີ.
ZNetwork ໄດ້ຮັບທຶນພຽງແຕ່ໂດຍຜ່ານຄວາມເອື້ອເຟື້ອເພື່ອແຜ່ຂອງຜູ້ອ່ານຂອງຕົນ.
ບໍລິຈາກ
1 ຄໍາຄິດຄໍາເຫັນ
Thank you for the usefully informative take on Venezuela. However, throughout, one is left wondering what ‘bad’ things Maduro has actually done? Or, that an opposition can reasonably say he has done. Perhaps you can point to another piece by yourself or someone else. My FB friends connections mostly point to Middle East, European, concerns, while I also worry about Corbyn. I’m also wondering if Corbyn and Sanders can be persuaded to meet. Sanders can easily pop over to visit his brother–and Jeremy be invited over. We need that anti-military anti-nuke tradition–EP Thompson, Bertrand Russell. This could open the discourse a bit and makes sense in terms of Sanders Institute and Voufofakis (Sp–I keep having to look up his name.) recent visit to same… Anyway thanks, Howard