Comparing Capitalism & ParEcon

Comparing Capitalism & ParEcon Ecology

The economy extracts and adds to the environment impacting it in diverse ways. This page compares capitalism and parecon vis a vis impact on the ecology.

Next Entry: Comparing Regarding International Relations

Picture

“South of Scranton”
by Peter Blume

Picture

“Bird Painting, Tropical”
by Marvin Hayes

Introducing Capitalist Ecology

In a capitalist economy, the ecology is a dump site and input storehouse, for the most part. The market-driven economy pursues profits — and one avenue of gain is to exploit resources and reduce costs by avoiding attention to environmental implications. Environmental costs are not counted because neither buyers nor sellers are victims of the dumping which occurs external to market transactions and thus fails to impact pricing and choices. Moreover, the economy drives toward ever larger scale in its very logic, which eventually incurs ecological devestation even without intentional dumping.

To impose environmental concerns on capitalist economic choices requires political pressure — and occurs against the logic of market exchange and disruptively to it.

Introducing ParEcon Ecology

In a parecon, prices reflect true social costs and benefits to all citizens, not just those immediately consuming or producing items. As a result, decisions are taken in light of impact on ecology and anything and everything else that affects producers and consumers. More, there is no bias built into the economy toward large scale, growth, centralization, etc. etc. Choices about such matters occur case by case and in light of both social, personal, and environmental implications.

The way that relative valuation in a parecon reflect ecological implications, however, is in terms of derivative affects on humans. Environmental costs — insofar as they are costs for people — are accounted in a parecon. If reducing a species hurts people, or for that matter benefits people, those effects are assessed and enter in parecon decisions. Also, those affected have a say proportionate to effects on them, providing real democracy. But, if we also want to curb or propel some activity based not on its implications for people, but rather based on its implications for some other species (as in animal rights, for example), that aim becomes, in a parecon, an extra-economic matter.

Political stances vis a vis ecological outcomes, however, are not biased by anything the economy does. It neither gives any constituency more nor less clout to utilize in political life…nor does it have any problem abiding constraints imposed from without.

Evaluating Capitalist Ecology

To the extent that the ecology is respected and attended, which can be considerable, it must occur against the natural tendencies of capitalism since those are to violate the ecology whenever profits can be had by doing so. Since capitalist economy also puts most political clout in the hands of owners, the political means of redressing or preventing ecological violations arising from economic life are sharply limited.

Evaluating ParEcon Ecology

To the extent that impacts on the ecology in turn impact people, parecon accounts them properly. To the extent they do not impact people, parecon does not account them, itself, but can abide any policy a polity might impose.

Ā Next Entry: Comparing Regarding International Relations

Ā 
Ā 

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.Ā  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors885
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.Ā  Tap šŸ”Š for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors885
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.