Yesterday’s assassination of Hamas spiritual leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin opened a new chapter in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His death will greatly alter the power balance within Hamas and leave it without a public face. Though this will certainly sap the organisation’s morale in the short run, the Israelis should not be deceived. Removing Yassin will not stop the violence or deter terrorists, but will result in further bloodshed and the retaliatory killing of civilians.


 


It was Yassin – the incarnation of evil in the eyes of Israelis – who kept Hamas in line and ensured that its violent outbursts were measured, calibrated, and doled out strategically rather than haphazardly.


 


In the strange world of Palestinian politics, Yassin was known as a moderate. Though he advocated violence and praised suicide bombers, he did not put faith in a military solution to the conflict. He often spoke of hundred-year truces between Israelis and Palestinians, or of a temporary cessation of hostilities that would grant de facto recognition of Israel.


 


These views pitted him against the hawkish side of the Hamas leadership in Gaza. Leaders such as Dr Abd al-Aziz Rantisi are dead set against any concessions or recognition of Israel and believe that if victory will not be achieved in their generation, it will come in future ones.


 


Yassin’s death, on the heels of the assassination of Ismail Abu Shanab last August, leaves the Hamas leadership in the hands of these hardliners, who preach violence as the only way to solve the conflict. Abu Shanab was the most pragmatic of the Hamas executive and openly accepted an Israeli state. With both of them gone, no one will preach moderation in Hamas’ inner circle.


 


Some analysts believe that Yassin’s restraining influence guided Hamas’ suicide bombing strategy. Cadres captured by the Israelis claim that each attack has been strategically planned as a response to Israeli incursions or killings. In contrast, leaders such as Rantisi advocate bombings at every opportunity, regardless of the prevailing political conditions.


 


Yassin not only grappled with the Hamas leaders in the Palestinian territories, he also clashed with the external leadership in Damascus led by Khalid Mashal, who wanted the organisation to take a more aggressive stance against the Israelis. In February 2002, after Yassin embraced a ceasefire declared by the ruling Palestinian Authority (PA), a Hamas cell attacked an Israeli patrol in the Gaza Strip. Hamas officials believe the order for the assault came from the external leadership who wanted to torpedo the truce. There were other occasions when Mashal wanted Hamas to kindle the flames of violence while Yassin wanted to douse them.


 


Yassin’s killing will certainly bring retaliation, but the targets of an unleashed Hamas may extend beyond Israelis. For years, Mashal and his underlings have advocated the use of violence against the ruling PA. They harbour the belief that killings can create a state of anarchy that will strengthen Hamas and allow it to overthrow the PA.


 


While Yassin lived, his stature and firm resolve stood as a barrier to Palestinian civil war. With his death, Mashal now has the upper hand and his external leadership may now seek to drown the Holy Land in blood and chaos.


 


Carnage followed Israel‘s last major assassination in 1996. The security services targeted Yahya Ayyash, Hamas’ chief bomb maker whom they held responsible for the deaths of over 60 Israelis. At the time, officials called the assassination a success and beamed satisfaction. But Hamas had the final word. It responded with a wave of suicide bombings in February and March 1996 that killed 62 and left Israel in a month-long state of panic.


 


Sheikh Ahmed Yassin was no advocate of peace. He launched young men equipped as human missiles to kill women and children and then boasted of it. But he understood the limits of violence. His successors recognise no such limits. They view violence as a tool to bleed Israel, foment hatred, and undermine the Palestinian Authority. And that is what to expect in the wake of Yassin’s death.


 


* Barak Barfi, based in Jerusalem, covers the Middle East for Agence Global and specialises in Palestinian politics. He can be reached at barak@agenceglobal.com.


 


 


 


 


 


 


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors684
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors684
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version