You can come up with a million ways to make the situation in Congress seem more subtle than this, but in every meaningful sense, we're in the exact same place today as we were last week and the week before and the week before that: Thanks to Republican hostage-taking, the most God-awful Congress in American history is still trying to figure out whether or not it wants to reopen government and whether or not it wants force a catastrophic default.

Reporters who cover the ins and outs of Congressional "deliberations" tell us that the focus has moved to the Senate where leaders are apparently frantically hitting refresh on finance.yahoo.com:

What started as a mad dash to strike a deal to lift the federal debt limit slowed to a crawl over the weekend as stalemated Senate leaders waited nervously to see whether financial markets would plunge Monday morning and drive the other side toward compromise.

But the fact remains that if Republicans would simply agree to take the shutdown and threat of default off the table, none of this would be happening. The Democratic position is the same that it's been all along: Congress should raise the debt limit to avoid default and it should reopen government to allow budget negotiations to continue. According to the New York Times, this represents a change in the position, however:

 

With a possible default on government obligations just days away, Senate Democratic leaders — believing they have a political advantage in the continuing fiscal impasse — refused Sunday to sign on to any deal that reopens the government but locks in budget cuts for next year. […] The core of the dispute is about spending, and how long a stopgap measure that would reopen the government should last. Democrats want the across-the-board cuts known as sequestration to last only through mid-November; Republicans want them to last as long as possible.

 

The thing is, this is exactly where the Senate has been all along. They've already passed legislation that would keep the government open through mid-November, so saying they want to stick to that timeframe isn't moving the goalposts. Given that even the House's defund Obamacare bill only funded government through mid-December, the differences here really shouldn't be all that big—unless Republicans are trying to use the leverage of a shutdown threat to lock in sequester spending cuts.

Of course, debating how long a temporary funding bill should last is a pretty strange thing to be debating when the government has already been shut down for two weeks and we're staring at the potential for default. But let us not forget this simple fact: The Senate has already passed a clean bill reopening government; it is now sitting in the House of Representatives, collecting dust. They could vote on it today and government would reopen in five minutes, but House Speaker John Boehner refuses to bring it up. And last week, the Senate tried to vote on raising the debt ceiling to end the threat of a government default, but Senate Republicans used the filibuster to block that vote from coming up.

Democrats have one demand and one demand only: That in order to reopen the government and avoid default, Congress should reopen government and avoid default. Republicans, meanwhile, still can't decide what should be in their ransom note, and how hard they should fight for it. And time is running out. 


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors705
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors705
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version