Source: Matthew Alford's Substack

Accident

On several occasions, nuclear war has only been averted by someone realising – or hoping – that incoming strikes were computer errors.  

“The President would stop it”. Well, in 1979, 1980, and 1995 the errors were identified with 2-6 minutes spare, so who knows what he’d have ordered in those panicky moments after activating “the briefcase”. But in 1962 and 1983, we know two individuals – then scorned for years – stared down powerful colleagues who instigated nuclear “retaliation”.

This is not 1979/80 – with a kindly old peanut farmer in the Oval Office, or 1995 – with US/Russia tensions at an all-time low. Do you think that in every false warning the pivotal person will have sufficient character and inclination to investigate and defy consensus and strictly rehearsed second-by-second protocol under unprecedented stress?

Miscalculation

“The computer problems must have all been fixed.” No – but even if they had, someone may initiate a limited strike. Putin, or a commander facing calamity, may feel it’s their best chance to survive or a way to re-establish deterrence following a major attack – say, a strike on the Kremlin.

It’s Worse

Just recently, Ukraine falsely claimed, then doubled down, that Russia had bombed Poland in a “calculated” escalation.

Barely reported, a British plane encountered Russian jets. One fired – and missed. The second pilot screamed but the first fired again. Russia would have incinerated 30 NATO troops, triggering Article 5, meaning WWIII… somehow, that second missile jammed.

“But Indians and Pakistanis have killed each other since developing nukes.” That’s also dire, especially between 1998-2002, but the West/Israel is facing off with Russia and China and Iran and North Korea with way more things to go wrong. I’m also underplaying the “close calls” – plus our appetite for, and ignorance of, the dangers.

THE Issue

It is simply not realistic to live like this much longer without an uncorrected error. We need treaties. Now. We need a massive anti-war movement. Now.

Join ICAN. Join CND. I have. Share this. Reach out – I’ll discuss it with anyone.


This article was originally published by Matthew Alford's Substack; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors682
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors682
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version