Source: The Intercept

The resounding ballot victory to keep abortion protections in the state constitution of deep-red Kansas is a rebuke to the Republican’s far-right agenda. It’s a win worth celebrating. The stakes of preserving legal abortion in Kansas couldn’t be higher. It is a reminder, too, of what those on the front lines of this struggle have long known: Banning abortions is popular only with an extremist yet extremely powerful Christo-fascist minority.

Since the GOP has made clear its comfort with — indeed explicit desire for — the entrenchment of far-right minority rule, the Kansas result will not shift the party’s priorities. Republicans will still push their pro-natalist, white supremacist agenda of taking bodily autonomy away from women and pregnant people. There’s no lesson in Kansas for Republicans.

It’s the Democratic establishment that should instead take a cue from the Kansas victory. The referendum result was, after all, also a rebuke to long-held centrist shibboleths — the same guiding principles that have failed to deliver nationwide abortion protections, let alone robust reproductive justice.

So-called moderate Democrats have consistently dismissed and kneecapped its progressive flank, and left-wing efforts more generally, as out of touch with what the much-mythologized average American wants. This has been true even in the case of abortion access.

Following the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson to throw out constitutional abortion rights, the White House cast calls for full-throated federal action to protect abortion as extreme. “Joe Biden’s goal in responding to Dobbs is not to satisfy some activists who have been consistently out of step with the mainstream of the Democratic Party,” said White House communications director Kate Bedingfield at the time.

The principle has been put into electoral action by the party’s establishment. Democrats in Washington have worked on the assumption that running anti-abortion candidates is a route to win in red states. After a draft of the Supreme Court’s ruling leaked, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Whip Jim Clyburn continued to support Rep. Henry Cuellar, the House’s most anti-abortion Democrat, against a progressive primary challenger.

Democrats, including Biden, have wisely responded to the Kansas victory by putting abortion rights in the foreground heading into the midterms. “The court practically dared women in this country to go to the ballot box to restore the right to choose,” Biden said on Wednesday.

Given Republicans’ clear plans for passing a nationwide abortion ban should they win strong congressional majorities in November, voting is indeed crucial. But Democrats need to do more than just not be Republicans.

Mealy-mouthed liberal Democrats have not earned our vote. Lest we forget, the party establishment prioritized funding for police and roundly failed to support the basic rights, let alone the flourishing, of those who voted them into power.

AS KANSAS SHOWED, grassroots struggle remains the sine qua non for defeating the white supremacist nationalists. It was hardly the work of the party establishment that achieved the ballot win. Organizers on the ground worked day and night to alert voters of the ballot measure, raise funds, build support, and counter heavy-handed manipulations from the Republican side. (The ballot’s wording was misleading, and the vote was scheduled on a key primary day for Republican candidates.)

Instead of taking the grassroots approach, though, centrist Democrats have until now been all too happy to compromise with the far right. Purportedly in the name of the “average American,” popular measures like universal health care, climate protections, student debt forgiveness, and minimum wage hikes, among other policies, have been sacrificed at the altar of bipartisan pandering and fealty to moribund institutions.

Part of the failure of imagination, of course, lies in the Democrats’ projection of the mythologized “average American” itself — invariably pictured as white and right-leaning. Among establishment Democrats, this figure has taken consistent precedence over living Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, as well as trans and nonbinary people, from whom Democrats presume support.

I’m not suggesting that the intertwined fights for racial, social, economic justice, and LGBTQ+ rights — however necessarily enmeshed they are in the fight for true reproductive justice — carry the same popular support as does protecting abortion access. The Kansas result is unlikely to profoundly shift establishment Democrats and liberal media mainstays away from their long held, false assumption that power is won by finding middle ground with the increasingly fascist right.

Kansas, though, might be enough for a limited Democratic response to campaign harder around abortion. That would be its own small victory.

In the meantime, Kansas is a reminder for the rest of us that there is power in our numbers.


This article was originally published by The Intercept; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version