Source: Left Foot Forward

Since announcing his leadership bid earlier this month, Zack Polanksi seems to have succeeded in his mission to shake things up. In an online video (which has now been viewed 1.4 million times), the current deputy leader of the Green Party launched his campaign declaring that it’s time for ‘bold action’ – and with it a promise to ‘cut through’ with clear positions and a louder voice in mainstream politics. 

Polanksi’s pitch is simple: The Green Party needs a stronger kind of leadership that isn’t content to merely sit on the sidelines. Arguably, this framing is a tacit acknowledgement of the party’s historic weaknesses. Despite their electoral gains – they won a record four seats in the last general election – the Green Party is still percieved as a marginal entity, perhaps too distracted by internal politics to really capture the public’s imagination. Polanksi is undoubtedly aware of this, and seems frustrated that the Greens are shying away from the limelight during a time of deepening political instability. 

A simple search of Google trends shows this phenomena unfolding in real time. Compared to Reform UK, the Green Party consistently trails in the shadow of the far-right populist party, despite only having one less seat in parliament. Perhaps it is these kind of metrics that led Polanski to describe his vision as an ‘eco-populist’ one, which apportions blame and responsibility for our broken social contract at the hands of corporations and big-business rather than immigrants and the unemployed. We should love our country’ he told the GuardianLoving your community is loving your country.’  By appealing to ordinary people and reclaiming the language of patriotism from the right, Polanksi hopes to inspire a mass movement that is unashamedly pro-environment and anti-oligarchy.

Take Net Zero, for instance. Speaking to the New Statesman, Polanksi is critical of Labour’s approach to it’s implementation, saying ‘I’m angry that the government are expecting some of the poorest in this country to step up to net zero, expecting people to install heat pumps or … get a train rather than a plane, even though a plane is a much cheaper option.’ So far, so Farage. But Polanksi then goes on to argue that it is wealthy corporations and the business elite that should shoulder the financial cost of Net Zero through a wealth tax; the Polanski bait and switch.

Less than two week’s earlier, it was former Labour frontman Tony Blair who seemed intent in undermining the government’s Net Zero policy, writing in a foreword to a report entitled ‘The Climate Paradox’ that: ‘Voters feel they’re being asked to make financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle when they know that their impact on global emissions is minimal … any strategy based on either ‘phasing out’ fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail’. Blair’s intervention was roundly rebuffed by Labour HQ, but the damage was done. 

In critiquing the delivery of Net Zero, Polanksi seems comfortable putting his neck out on the line and getting stuck into the culture wars. It also shows that he is not interested in perpetuating the Green party stereotype. For the past two decades, Green party politicians have typically been polite, highly educated and largely supportive of any policy that ostensibly seems ‘good’ for our environment. By contrast, Polanksi started out in acting, before becoming a hypnotist and getting involved in the environmental movement in his thirties. A practicing Jew, he is also vocal in his opposition to the war in Gaza – tweeting: ‘We – in our Jewish communities – don’t speak out against Netenyahu’s massacre in Gaza despite being Jewish, we speak out *because* we’re Jewish.’

In breaking with this mould, and actually pushing Labour to re-evaluate their delivery of Net Zero, Polanksi seems to be shedding some of the cautiousness that has previously held the Green’s back. It’s a risky strategy amongst an electorate not renowned for their ability to absorb nuance, but perhaps the kind of audaciousness that might resonate with an electorate hungry for visionary leadership.

By contrast, incumbant co-leader Adrian Ramsay, who is seeking re-election on a joint ticket with Ellie Chowns MP, seems to take the opposite approach to Polanski, saying:

“There are parts of the political spectrum that are determined to turn this [Net Zero] into a political football but I think reasonable people within all parties need to resist.” Ramsay’s cautiousness and reluctance to truly engage with the populist tactics of Reform may well prove to be his undoing.

Instinctively it would appear that a more combative Green Party would make life harder for Labour. Afterall, the Greens came second to Labour in 39 seats in the general election. If they were able to convert another three or four of those at the next general then they would prove that they are more than a marginal political presence. Polanski wants to go further than that though, arguing that there’s a gaping hole in the left of British politics that the Green’s should be primed to exploit at the scale of Reform. In the interim, it’s also not inconceivable that independent MPs, such as Zarah Sultana and Apsana Begum, who have both had the Labour whip withdrawn, may choose to join the Greens.

With Polanksi at the helm, Labour, and particularly those on the downtrodden left of the party, could finally encounter some robust opposition to Starmer’s ultra-pragmatic policy agenda. In some respects, this would probably be (secretly) welcomed by the likes of Angela Rayner and Ed Miliband, who both seem ill-at-ease with the Starmer’s recent overtures towards Reform. A more strident and disciplined Green party with a confident and capable leader should help redress the lop-sidedness of our current political moment, which disproportionately platforms far-right ideas at the expense of everyone, but especially our society’s most vulnerable and marginalised groups.

Early momentum certainly seems to be on Polanski’s side, with Ramsay’s co-leader Carla Denyer recently announcing that she wouldn’t be seeking re-election. If Polanksi is able to realize his vision, then the Greens will finally bring a genuine sense of dynamism into the left of British politics, which has been left withering on a vine since the demise of Corbynism.


This article was originally published by Left Foot Forward; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Grace Pengelly is a writer and editor. Read more of her writing on politics and culture at The Murmuration.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate

1 Comment

  1. From reading this article, you wouldn’t know if the guy is called Polanski (5x) or Polanksi (11x). (The former is the correct one.)

Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors707
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors707
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version