Source: Informed Comment

Photo by chaiviewfinder/Shutterstock

While conservatives like Texas governor Greg Abbott and Tucker Carlson have been busy putting down wind turbines as unreliable, America has been voting with its pocketbook. The verdict? We want more wind-powered electricity, precisely because it is inexpensive and reliable.

So we may conclude from the Sustainable Energy in America Factbook produced annually for the Business Council for Sustainable Energy by BloombergNEF, the report of which for 2020 is just out.

The report says, “The U.S. onshore wind sector posted its highest-ever year of installations in 2020, topping 17GW. The sector has shown remarkable resilience in the face of the pandemic.”

“GW” stands for “gigawatt,” which means a billion watts. You know how you might have a 100-watt light bulb in your lamp at home? 10 million of those.

A gigawatt typically powers about 300,000 American homes, so we put in enough wind power to provide electricity to 5,100,000 homes last year, in the midst of the pandemic and its accompanying recession. That is the equivalent of nearly 4 percent of American homes, that have been provided electricity by clean wind, in just one year.

If we could just repeat our 2020 performance every year for the next ten years, we’d be able to power 40 percent of American homes with wind alone. Unfortunately, new wind farm startups are not planned at the same pace as they were in 2020, in part because of expiring congressional incentives. America, you know what to do.

Of course, that isn’t good enough if we are to reach our Paris Climate goals, which the US government has just reaffirmed as a goal, but reentering the accord under the Biden administration. We have to power not only homes but businesses and other buildings. And we need better storage so that the wind power doesn’t get wasted, and so that we can store it when the wind is not blowing.

So we need a carbon tax to reward companies that use renewables, and punish the dirty polluters. It has to be crafted so that working people are held harmless.

Another piece of good news is that US-based companies made a lot of our wind turbines, creating jobs. The Bloomberg report notes, “The U.S. is now home to four major turbine manufacturers: General Electric (GE), Vestas, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE). In the U.S., GE and Vestas accounted for 87% of local manufacturing capacity in 2019.” GE is particularly oriented to the US market. The report adds, “Historically, almost two-thirds of GE’s all-time installations by capacity have been in its home market, the U.S., compared to a quarter for Vestas.”

So what do Greg Abbott and Tucker Carlson have against GE? Are they socialists or something?

One big area of potential growth is offshore wind, which has enormous potential. But the sector has run into major permitting problems. To the extent that the Biden administration can, it should swing into action to make permitting easier for offshore wind.

The Bloomberg report notes, “The U.S. offshore wind sector is poised for rapid growth but has been in limbo as as the country’s first potential large-scale project awaits a federal permit. Despite the sector’s great promise, there are still only 42MW of turbine installed in U.S. waters.”

Offshore wind accounts for 10 percent of the electricity generation in Britain. It is 15 percent in the European Union. The United Kingdom may attempt to get all the electricity for all its homes from offshore wind by 2030.

It was a good year for solar, too. Bloomberg says, “Utility-scale installations rose to 12.3GWdc in 2020.” (That is, 12.3 gigawatts direct current, i.e. from the panels themselves.)

That should cover 3,690,000 homes. It means they get their electricity from clean, free sunshine and are not spewing dangerous carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, where it will trap the sun’s heat and keep it on earth.

If this sort of progress could be made in a pandemic year and under a Trump administration that worked against wind and solar on behalf of dangerous, dirty fossil fuels, imagine what we can accomplish under the Biden administration.

If you are the sort of person who writes letters or emails to your congressional representatives and senators, do press them to pass legislation promoting wind and solar and to put in a carbon tax. If you aren’t, you could start. Your representatives in D.C. are very sensitive to constituent letters, and typically they multiply them in their minds because they figure that for every person who writes, there are a certain further number of people who feel the same way but didn’t write.

—-

Bonus Video:

Mitsubishi: “The Growing Role of Wind Power in America”

Juan R. I. Cole is Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan. For three and a half decades, he has sought to put the relationship of the West and the Muslim world in historical context, and he has written widely about Egypt, Iran, Iraq, and South Asia. His books include Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires; The New Arabs: How the Millennial Generation is Changing the Middle East; Engaging the Muslim World; and Napoleon’s Egypt: Invading the Middle East.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors892
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors892
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version