Venezuelans Vote to Eliminate Two-Term Limit on All Elected Office 54.4% to 45.6%

 

February 15, 2009 (venezuelanalysis.com)— At 9:35pm local time, three and a half hours after polls closed and with 94.2% of voted counted, Venezuela’s National Electoral Council announced that Venezuelans had voted 54.4% to 45.6% in favor of a constitutional amendment to eliminate the two-term limit on all elected office.

Chávez supporters celebrated the nearly 9-point victory margin with enthusiasm, as it will allow President Hugo Chávez to run for a third full term in 2012.

According to the CNE, abstention was relatively low, at 33%, with about 11 out 16 million registered voters voting, which is about two million more votes than in 2007, for the failed constitutional reform referendum that would have altered 69 articles of Venezuela’s constitution.

Chávez and his supporters had argued that the elimination of term limits is necessary to allow Chávez to govern for longer than the four years remaining in his term, in order to complete Venezuela’s transition to "Bolivarian Socialism."

 


Venezuelans Vote Peacefully Over whether to Amend Constitution

by James Suggett and Tamara Pearson

Venezuela, February 15, 2009 (venezuelanalysis.com)– Since the trumpets and fireworks woke up Venezuelans at three o’clock this morning to vote in a national referendum on whether to amend the constitution to abolish the two-term limit on all elected offices, the electoral process has been tranquil, democratic, and efficient in nearly every region of Venezuela, with few irregularities reported.

On December 1 President Hugo Chavez called on his party, the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) to campaign for the constitutional change, at first just proposing that the limit be withdrawn from the position of president. In January the national assembly approved the change, adding that it be applied to all elected positions, and then put it to a general referendum.

According to the National Electoral Council (CNE), all voting centers were open by 9am. Voting centers are meant to be open at 5.30am, and must stay open until 6pm or later if there still are people waiting in line.

Chief of the military’s Strategic Command Operation for the elections, Jesus Gonzalez, said that voting had begun with "completely normality, except for a few exceptions." He said one person had been detained for breaking one of the voting machines.

In the capital city of Caracas, people with purple indelible ink-dyed fingertips, signaling that they had voted in the early morning, walked their dogs, read books in the park, played happily with their children, and listening in groups to reggaeton or salsa music.

When inquired about their feelings about the referendum, most Venezuelans said the voting machines were quick and easy, and they encouraged their fellow citizens to exercise their democratic rights.

"This is our duty to the country, to come out and vote. It is our life, our country, our process," said one woman in the La Pastora neighborhood. A man waiting in a short line nearby commented, "Everyone should come and fulfill their duty to the country, independent of their political position, come vote and combat abstention."

Observers reported that there were very few long lines with fifty or more voters, while notably short voting lines were very prevalent in the capital city as well as other major cities, including Mérida, San Cristobal, Maracaibo, and Maracay. Government officials said this is because Venezuelans are only voting on a single, yes-or-no question.

People in the street, in both upper class neighborhoods as well as low-income barrios, told Venezuelanalysis they expect most people to vote in the late afternoon, perhaps because they had been up late celebrating Valentine’s Day last night.  

The National Guard and other security officers maintained a well-marked security perimeter around voting centers, and treated voters and observers with utmost courtesy, using neutral language and displaying knowledge of the electoral norms laid down by the National Electoral Council (CNE).

In Mérida a truck playing the reveille bugle call traveled around the city from 3am until about 7am, to wake up voters and voting booth attendees.

In one voting center in a small primary school in Belen, a small line had formed by 6.30 am, while at a larger center in the city center, Libertador High School, there were long lines of 10-15 people per voting room (with 12 voting rooms in the school, assigned according to identification number). By afternoon there were few people in the lines.

The voting process was identical to that of the regional elections in November last year. The National Guard arrived from 4am, and was responsible for managing the lines at the various stages and checking ID’s before people went inside.

Inside, people formed new lines, sitting down patiently. From there 3 or 4 people lined up outside their voting room until they were let in. They showed their identification at a table, put their fingerprints next to their name, were asked if they knew how to vote, then went behind a cardboard screen to the computer, where they marked their vote on a touch screen. The computer printed out a hard copy of their vote, which they placed in a ballot box. Finally, they dipped their small finger in indelible ink.

The head of each voting room asked the voter, "Do you know how to vote?" and "You have two options, choose one."

All voting center workers were patient, helpful, did not rush voters, and used very neutral language when giving instructions. Likewise, voters were calm, cheerful, keen, and disciplined.

"Yes, its all going well, I hope everyone comes out to vote to decide for our country," said Quina Quintero, from Merida.

"I voted ‘No’, it was quick, much quicker than last time," said Oliverio Picon.

"It’s fabulous, great, very fast, very good. Yes it’s important that everyone vote, the whole thing is totally democratic," said Eliana Molina.

This referendum is the second ever totally automated national election in Venezuela, out of a total of 13 electoral cycles the country has undergone since Chavez was elected ten years ago.

In contrast to previous elections, this voting day has been marked by relatively few acts of politically motivated violence. The only major incident of violence was a burglary and vandalism of the social work school at the Central University of Venezuela (UCV) in Caracas early this morning. Burglars identifying themselves as members of the opposition group Bandera Roja broke windows, set fire to paperwork, broke furniture, and spray painted "No means No," and anti-amendment slogan, on the walls.

Eleven people have been detained in the state of Tachira, for public disorder near a voting center. They will receive warnings.

Opposition observers have made one public complaint, as the pro-Chavez governor of Anzoategui, Tarek Saab voted a second time after his first vote was nullified.

Early in the morning, voters in a few voting centers had reported that the machine had registered a null vote, signaled by a blank voting receipt, when they had intended to vote yes or no on the amendment. Promptly, CNE President Tibisay Lucena announced on national television that voters should be sure a check mark appears to the left of their choice before pressing the vote button on the machine.

There are 16,767,511 registered voters, 11,422 voting centers in addition to 126 voting centers in overseas embassies and consulates.

 

James Suggett reporting from Caracas and Tamara Pearson reporting from Mérida.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version