Source: Jacobin

None of what we’re watching unfold in the Middle East right now had to happen. It could have all been avoided, and still could be, even now.

The ethnic cleansing and mass murder in Gaza could end, the Houthi attacks on international shipping could stop, the wider, catastrophic war that day by day gets closer to breaking out in the Middle East could be prevented.

All it would take is doing the one thing that president Joe Biden has refused to do, in the face of all political logic, common sense, and public pressure: support a permanent cease-fire between Israel and Hamas, and use the enormous power and leverage Washington has over the tiny Middle Eastern country to make it stop its war on Gaza.

Biden continues to balk at doing this. So what we’ve gotten instead is Thursday’s US bombing of Yemen, the war-ravaged country that Washington already spent seven years helping eviscerate by supplying and facilitating Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates’ brutal war against it. The seventy-three strikes hit sixty targets across five of the country’s regions, killing five and wounding six. After running for president and winning by vowing to end the shameful US support for the Saudi war, Biden has not only broken that promise, but seemingly decided to cut out the middleman and start a US war with Yemen directly.

Biden’s bombing — done in concert with loyal lapdog Great Britain, and with the verbal support of (some) other countries that the president couldn’t get to join in — is ostensibly meant to end the attacks from Yemen’s ruling Houthi government on commercial ships in the Red Sea headed to or from Israeli ports. The attacks had caused some of the world’s biggest shipping firms to suspend shipping in the Red Sea entirely, leading the White House to threaten, and eventually carry out, its own strikes to protect “the free flow of international commerce” and to not allow “hostile actors to imperil freedom of navigation.”

The irony was not lost on anyone that Biden was willing to bomb and kill to protect the rights of shipping containers, but has been just fine with 250 human beings slaughtered and more than ten children losing legs each day in Gaza. “This is war. . . . Innocent civilians are going to be hurt going forward,” as national security spokesperson John Kirby memorably said. After having justified wars by invoking the “responsibility to protect” civilians from exactly the kinds of massacres the US government is now facilitating in Gaza, US officials are now talking about the “responsibility to protect the flow of international commerce.”

Nor has it escaped notice that Washington isn’t exactly a consistent defender of the freedom of navigation: under its illegal sanctions on Iran, US forces have repeatedly intercepted Iranian vessels and seized the oil they were carrying (before shamelessly selling the stolen goods for a profit). Likewise, Washington said nothing when Israeli forces killed nine people in 2010, including a US citizen, on a Turkish flotilla traveling to Gaza with humanitarian goods, in order to enforce Israel’s own illegal blockade on Gaza.

In any case, it’s hard to take seriously that the Biden administration’s show of force is going to achieve what it’s meant to achieve. For seven years, the people of Yemen endured a merciless blockade and indiscriminate bombing campaign that triggered widespread starvation, an explosion of disease, and the deaths of at least 377,000 people. While dozens of airstrikes and five deaths is nothing to sneeze at, it doesn’t compare to this unfathomable level of suffering. In fact, Yemenis have already reacted with defiance, with Houthi officials warning that the US strikes would “not go unanswered and unpunished” and that they were “ready to deter and respond,” and tens of thousands of Yemenis rallying angrily across the country.

No, as all this suggests, the most likely thing that will come of Biden’s actions is a counter-response from the Houthis, a cycle of escalation, and the miserable killing in Gaza coming closer to exploding into yet another disastrous, US-fought war in the Middle East. Even the Saudi government — the Saudi government! — that spent years pitilessly brutalizing Yemen was alarmed by Biden’s decision, calling for restraint and “avoiding escalation” in response to the US strikes.

That Israel’s actions might set off a wider regional war that pulls in the United States has been a live, but somewhat dormant, concern since the start of its destruction of Gaza in October. The US military has already bombed targets in Iraq and Syria numerous times, while US bases in the two countries have been attacked 127 times in the past three months thanks to Biden’s support for what Israel’s doing.

But recently, a regional war has become an alarming and increasingly likely possibility, with US officials now drawing up contingency plans to fight one. The US bombing of Yemen came shortly after the Israeli government, which has been behaving in an increasingly rogue fashion, decided to carry out a drone strike on a Hamas official in Beirut (killing six other people), and then quickly followed it up with the killing of a Hezbollah commander in the country’s south. The Biden administration has reportedly already had to persuade Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon.

These strikes — carried out amid rising US concerns about a wider war, and as the Biden administration has been feeding information to reporters about its behind-the-scenes efforts to contain one — have raised suspicions that Israel might actually be deliberately trying to provoke a bigger conflict and possibly drag the United States into it, whether to give a shot in the arm to a faltering war effort or as a way to save Netanyahu from being rolled as leader, or even going to jail. According to a recent Huffington Post report, multiple US war games have Israeli-Lebanese fighting “escalat[ing] into something terrible,” in the words of a US official, while Politico reports on US assessments of a heightened risk that Hezbollah will attack Americans in the Middle East — or even within US borders.

The absurd thing is that US intelligence itself acknowledges that none of these groups actually want to fight a war, and that they’re all interested in the same thing: an end to the killing in Gaza. The Houthi government has made very clear that their attacks on shipping are a response to Israel’s “ongoing horrific massacres, genocide, and siege against Palestinians in Gaza,” and that their intention is to pressure the United States and Israel to support a cease-fire. Preventing events from continuing to spin out of control could not be simpler — yet still Biden buries his head in the sand, despite all signs pointing to it putting his reelection chances in peril.

Running for president, Biden endlessly repeated that he would end the era of “forever wars,” that he wouldn’t embroil the country in yet another Middle Eastern war, and celebrated that “for the first time in 20 years, the United States is not at war,” after his chaotic but ultimately correct withdrawal from Afghanistan. Now he’s heedlessly barreling towards that very thing. It wouldn’t be too late for him to turn back and choose peace. More alarming is the possibility that his attacks on Yemen indicate he’s already made up his mind.


This article was originally published by Jacobin; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Branko Marcetic is a staff writer at Jacobin magazine and a 2019-2020 Leonard C. Goodman Institute for Investigative Reporting fellow. He is the author of Yesterday’s Man: The Case Against Joe Biden.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors710
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors710
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version