Source: Centre for Economic and Policy Research

Donald Trump seems to have even more trouble staying focused these days than usual. People may recall back to April 2 — which Trump declared as “Liberation Day” — when he imposed massive tariffs that were supposedly going to keep other countries from ripping us off. To Trump, ripping us off meant that they were running trade surpluses with us.

As many have pointed out, this is a rather odd notion of getting ripped off. If a country sells us more than we sell to them, it seems like we’re getting a good deal. It’s sort of like if we go to a grocery store and buy things we like, at prices we consider fair. They sold us more than they bought from us, unless we happen to be farmers, but we usually wouldn’t say we have been ripped off.

But anyhow, that was the Trump story a month and a half ago. He considered getting our trade deficit down, or even eliminating it altogether, to be a matter of the utmost urgency.

But that’s apparently ancient history now. Trump seems intent on wrecking our university system, which is a major source of export earnings. Earlier he had cut off billions of dollars of grants that had been awarded to Harvard by the National Institutes of Health and other government agencies. He also threatened to take away their tax-exempt status, which would likely lead to a major reduction in contributions.

In his latest move, Kristi Noem, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, announced that she would not grant visas to any international students attending Harvard. This applies both to prospective students and also students already enrolled in degree programs.

This would be a huge blow to Harvard. It both gets considerable tuition money from foreign students, but also enrolls some prized graduate students. Because of its reputation, Harvard attracts many top students from all over the world. Noem’s action would end this.

People can think whatever they want about Harvard, but this is an attack on the American university system in general. If the administration can cancel someone’s ability to study here, any time it wants, for any reason whatsoever, then few students from other countries will opt to attend colleges or universities in the United States.

And universities are actually a major source of export earnings for the United States. Last year, we got over $56 billion from tuition and other expenses paid by foreigners to US colleges and universities. This number is likely to fall sharply next year.

In fact, foreign tourism more generally is a very large source of exports earnings for the United States. This category generated $215.3 billion in revenue in 2024. That compares to $165 billion for agricultural products, $171.6 billion for cars and parts, $125 billion for aircraft and $97 billion for steel and other metals. If we care about reducing our trade deficit, it would seem that attracting foreign students to our universities and foreign travelers to visit the country, should be a big part of the picture.

Harvard will likely challenge Noem’s action in court, as it has done with earlier efforts by the Trump administration to punish it. However, whatever the courts ultimately rule, we are likely to pay a price due to fewer students coming here, as well as tourists and other travelers.

There are many places in the world that people living outside the United States can go to study or for vacations. It’s a safe bet that most of them would rather go to a country where politicians can’t have them detained and/or deported based on any whim that goes through their head. If the Trump administration really cares about the trade deficit, they should be thinking about this fact in their dealings with Harvard and other universities.


This article was originally published by Centre for Economic and Policy Research; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC. Dean previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He has also worked as a consultant for the World Bank, the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, and the OECD's Trade Union Advisory Council.

Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors685
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors685
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version