Source: Truthout

The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it is seizing full control over which journalists have access to the press pool covering the president, taking the power from the organization that has represented journalists who cover the White House for over 100 years.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt informed reporters of the change during a briefing, saying that the Trump administration will now determine who is allowed to be part of the press gaggle that covers Trump in places where there are limited spots, like the Oval Office or Air Force One.

In the past, the makeup of the pool has been overseen by the White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA), an independent group headed by journalists elected by fellow members of the media.

The White House’s move came in direct retaliation to the WCHA after it filed a lawsuit against the White House for discriminating against The Associated Press. Earlier this month, the White House revoked AP’s access to the pool because the publication said that it will not adhere to Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico since the change is not recognized by other countries, while still acknowledging the “Gulf of America” terminology.

Leavitt claimed that the change was made in order to give opportunities to outlets previously denied a spot in the pool — but the WHCA and commentators immediately noted that the move is actually an attempt to control press coverage and skew it in the White House’s favor.

“This move tears at the independence of a free press in the United States. It suggests the government will choose the journalists who cover the president,” said Eugene Daniels, WHCA President and Politico journalist, in a statement. “In a free country, leaders must not be able to choose their own press corps.”

Prior to this announcement, the White House has already stuffed the briefing room full of people working for far right and pro-Trump outlets, with ties to neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Reporters have observed Leavitt calling on these reporters for questions more often than those from other outlets, who then go on to ask softball questions or espouse outright praise for the administration.

A spot on the press pool allows journalists direct access to the president to ask questions, playing a crucial role in shaping coverage of executive orders and actions. Without journalists to press Trump on actions he’s taking, the media could become less critical, and runs the risk of becoming a public relations mouthpiece for the administration, rather than producing independent news coverage.

During Trump’s first term, he also retaliated against the press by revoking the White House credentials of CNN’s Jim Acosta after he angered Trump by questioning the president’s anti-immigrant rhetoric and bringing up the alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election. Acosta’s pass was restored after a federal judge ruled in his favor.


This article was originally published by Truthout; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate

Sharon Zhang is a news writer at Truthout covering politics, climate and labor. Before coming to Truthout, Sharon had written stories for Pacific Standard, The New Republic, and more. She has a master’s degree in environmental studies.

Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors688
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors688
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version