Source: Inside Climate News

BROOKHAVEN, N.Y.—The crowd grew restless at Brookhaven Town Hall on Long Island as residents voiced their concerns about groundwater contamination from a nearby landfill that has spread beneath parts of their community.

At the meeting in late March, speakers criticizing the landfill’s operations were met with applause and shouts of support from the audience.

Monique Fitzgerald and the organization she co-founded, the Brookhaven Landfill Action and Remediation Group, have urged the town to close the landfill. Fitzgerald, a lifelong resident of North Bellport, a hamlet within Brookhaven, and other residents have been concerned about the contamination for decades.

“I am disappointed,” Fitzgerald told town officials. “You just wasted our time with this presentation.” 

The contamination plume extends roughly 8,000 feet southeast from the landfill, according to the Town of Brookhaven, which owns the structure. Though it has not reached any drinking water sources, it has spread to the groundwater beneath homes and roadways, and a portion of it discharges into the Beaver Dam Creek, according to a report the town submitted to state regulators. 

Town officials and contracted engineers evaluated several potential responses, including immediately closing the landfill or pumping out contaminated groundwater for treatment. 

Instead, officials recommended what they described as the most practical and cost-effective measures: expanded monitoring of the contamination and connecting some homes with private drinking wells to the municipal water supply.

The Town of Brookhaven did not respond to multiple requests for comment for this story.

North Bellport and Brookhaven have been designated as disadvantaged communities by the state. The classification recognizes heightened vulnerability to environmental hazards due to demographic, health and socioeconomic factors.

Lynne Maher, a Brookhaven resident who says she lives near the contaminated groundwater, felt the town was toying with people’s lives.

“The town cannot be trusted,” she said, accusing town officials of using “scare tactics.” 

“Anything … Could Be in There”

The 270-foot-tall Brookhaven landfill, which opened more than 50 years ago, towers over nearby communities. It has six so-called “cells,” which are operational units that divide large landfills. Currently, only one “cell” is still accepting waste—mostly waste incineration ash. The first three cells, which were all closed before 1995, accepted solid waste.

When a landfill is operational, moisture and rainwater can soak the waste, creating contaminated runoff. Today, the liquid is collected and pumped out of the landfill using a dedicated collection system and storage tanks. But the landfill’s earliest cell was built before the current regulations were in place.

Due to inadequate liners in earlier cells, the mixture, also called leachate, has leaked into the groundwater in the surrounding area. The spread of the contamination is commonly known as a “plume.”

As confirmed by state regulators, the groundwater contains levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS or “forever chemicals,” above New York’s standards for groundwater. 

PFAS chemicals are found in consumer and industrial products—and they’re very difficult to break down. Scientists have detected them in soil, water, fish and even human blood, though their effect on human and animal health are still being studied. According to the EPA, exposure to these chemicals can adversely affect reproductive health, child development and increase the risk of certain cancers.

Though the town’s report asserts that the historical use of PFAS in consumer products makes it difficult to attribute the contamination to the landfill, state regulators have urged the town to acknowledge that the landfill is “the only conclusively identified source of emerging contaminants” for the area beneath it, in their comments on the original report. 

Regulators also confirmed elevated levels of 1,4-dioxane, an industrial solvent. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the chemical “poses an unreasonable risk to human health,” and has been linked to higher cancer risks when present in drinking water. 

“We’re talking about landfill leachate that can contain many hundreds of different man-made chemicals,” said Jennifer Epstein, a freshwater ecologist who is now the director of science at New York River Watch, a group advocating for better water quality. 

“Anything really that’s been used in commerce and has gone into some type of consumer good … could be in there,” she said.

U.S. Geological Survey scientists first detected groundwater contamination at the Brookhaven landfill in 1983. 

In 2022, sampling required by new landfill regulations again confirmed the presence of the plume. The state Department of Environmental Conservation ordered the Town of Brookhaven to investigate the plume and develop “corrective measures” to remediate or limit the damage caused by the existing plume, which are now being reviewed. 

The Leachate Problem

Though landfill leachate can enter the soil and groundwater through inadequate landfill liners, there are other ways the chemicals it contains can end up in local water bodies.

When landfill leachate is collected in the typical fashion, through pipes that transport it to holding tanks, it is often taken to a wastewater treatment plant.

While wastewater treatment plants are designed to clean contaminants typically found in households and businesses, they often cannot break down and remove the complex chemicals present in landfill leachate. 

The 270-foot-tall Brookhaven landfill opened more than 50 years ago. Credit: Lauren Dalban/Inside Climate News

The federal Safe Drinking Water Act usually develops regulations for one chemical at a time, making it difficult to fully protect people from leachate, which often contains a range of contaminants, said Epstein. 

EPA documents acknowledge that typical drinking water treatment systems do not remove 1,4-dioxane. The Suffolk County Water Authority, which serves Brookhaven, removes the solvent to state standards using a method called the Advanced Oxidation Process, but it can be very costly. 

In 2017, the water authority filed a lawsuit against chemical companies, alleging that they manufactured and sold 1,4-dioxane knowing it would pollute groundwater when used as intended. Last year, a judge ruled that it could move forward to trial.

Scientists are still figuring out how to test and remove PFAS, which encompasses thousands of different chemicals. 

When a wastewater treatment plant sufficiently cleans a liquid, the treated water is released back into local waterbodies to re-enter the water cycle. Currently, the plants don’t have limits on how much PFAS they can discharge into those water bodies. 

Drinking water sources in New York are still treated for two types of PFAS, and will have to reduce the levels of four more by 2029, according to current EPA regulations. According to the state’s Health Department, regulators ultimately want to develop treatment standards for 23 common PFAS chemicals.

In May, however, the EPA announced proposed rules that would rescind drinking water regulations for four PFAS chemicals and potentially delay the implementation of limits on two others. 

When these chemicals do end up in local water bodies, the source is not always landfill leachate because PFAS are present in many manufacturing processes. But, Epstein said, regulators know that these contaminants are present in leachate, so “to allow it to then be dispersed back into the environment is a really illogical practice.” 

“If you know that you have problems with the amount of contamination in your water, it makes a lot of sense to turn off the spigots that you can—that you know are a source,” she said.

Epstein and her organization have been advocating for on-site treatment of landfill leachate. Since 2023, state regulators have been considering regulatory changes to landfill leachate management to reduce this downstream contamination. They aim to submit a proposal to the public this summer.

Concerns in North Bellport and Brookhaven

Residents near the Brookhaven landfill are no strangers to the burden of pollution—not just in the local groundwater, but also in the air.

Landfills release methane into the surrounding atmosphere. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes strongly to short-term global warming. Elevated levels of it in the air can also lead to ground-level ozone, a harmful pollutant associated with more local asthma hospitalizations. 

Landfills may release more methane than state data reveals. Katherine Blauvelt, executive director of Full Circle Future, a nonprofit that tracks landfill emission regulation, said that the state’s reporting methodology was “flawed.” The state, she said, doesn’t use modern technology like drones or satellite imagery to track methane. 

“They’re still walking around with handheld devices only four times a year, and then again they’re reporting their estimated emissions based on a formula, not based on reality,” said Blauvelt, a former assistant commissioner for energy resources in Minnesota.

This past January, the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation released new regulations for measuring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions from landfills. Starting in 2029, many large landfill emitters will be required to directly monitor methane using advanced detection technologies, while most landfills will need to begin reporting emissions data starting in June 2027.

Blauvelt and her organization hope the regulations will provide residents who live near landfills with the information needed to link landfills to local health disparities. 

“They can tell that something is happening in their communities, but they don’t actually have the data or the monitoring or the tracking to really understand what’s happening to people they love, to themselves, to their communities,” she said.

The Town of Brookhaven has requested an extension for its operating permit, which expires in July. The landfill is expected to reach capacity in the second half of 2028, though operators told Newsday it could remain open longer.

Fitzgerald wants to see a plan for the landfill’s eventual closure—one that includes a real effort to reduce waste. 

“We stand in solidarity with communities across the country and the globe where our waste is ending up,” she said. 

Lauren Dalban is a New York City-based reporter with a background in local journalism. A former ICN fellow, she now covers environmental issues in all five boroughs. Originally from London, she earned a B.A. in History and English from the University of Virginia, and an M.S. from Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.


This article was originally published by Inside Climate News; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Lauren Dalban is a New York City-based reporter with a background in local journalism. A former ICN fellow, she now covers environmental issues in all five boroughs. Originally from London, she earned a B.A. in History and English from the University of Virginia, and an M.S. from Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors712
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors712
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version