Jeff Bezos is stepping down as CEO of Amazon. He’ll stay on as the executive chairman of Amazon’s board, but he’ll no longer be managing the company on a daily basis. Editors and pundits worldwide are treating this news as an epochal event. The supreme giant of the Internet economy, goes the refrain, is moving on.
The Bezos decision to exit Amazon’s CEO suite, Bloomberglaments, at least partially ends “one of the most epic runs in modern business history.” Bezos, addsCNET, gave us “more than a quarter-century of shattering the status quo.” The man built, exclaims CNBC, “a $1.6 trillion company from nothing.” His “genius,” the UK Telegraphsums up, makes Bezos, “the Henry Ford of his generation.”
Look, Jeff Bezos certainly does rate as a smart guy. But smart people abound in the Internet economy. Many of them work at Amazon. Collectively, as a group, all these smart people have brought us the many innovations that have sped Amazon’s rise to global dominance, everything from personalized recommendations to “1-Click” shopping.
In other words, Jeff Bezos individually didn’t create an enterprise hundreds of millions of people worldwide now depend on. The employees at Amazon, working together, created this enterprise. They deserve the credit, not one individual named Jeff Bezos. We ought to be recognizing their collective achievement.
And who couldn’t agree more that the “1.3 million talented, dedicated people” who work for Amazon have “done crazy things together” that lie at “the root” of Amazon’s success? None other than Jeff Bezos himself. All these noble sentiments appear in the February 2 letter Bezos emailed to Amazon employees on the day he announced his decision to step down as CEO.
“I hope you are as proud of our inventiveness as I am,” the Bezos email smiled. “I think you should be.”
Now on one level, of course, the sentiments in this Bezos salute to Amazon’s staff merely follow the standard departing-executive magnanimity playbook. Tell your folks you couldn’t have done it without them. We’ve each heard this line — from those at the top — a hundred times over. But that doesn’t make the line false. Enterprise success does reflect a collective effort. Always has. Always will.
So kudos to Bezos for following that standard playbook and recognizing — in his farewell words as CEO — the enormous contributions that Amazon’s employees have made over the past 27 years. But hisses and boos for his abject failure, over those same 27 years, to recognize those contributions in actual deed. Amazon’s employees should have been sharing in the company’s success all along. The rewards, instead, have flowed overwhelmingly to Bezos himself.
Bezos now rates, depending on the vagaries of the daily stock market, as the richest or second-richest person on Earth. His total fortune, according to the Bloomberg billionaire tracker, now stands at nearly $200 billion. Bezos claims in his farewell email to staff that Amazon deserves praise for upping its minimum pay to $15 an hour. What the letter doesn’t point out: At $15 an hour, an Amazon worker would have to labor over 32,000 years to earn even one of his billions.
Amazon under Bezos has consciously chosen not to share its success. Modern economies share success most fundamentally through the collective bargaining process. Workers join in unions. Unions keep employers from ignoring the contributions workers are making to corporate success. Amazon, right from the company’s start, has maneuvered to keep Amazon union-free.
All the attention on the Bezos CEO exit is helping Amazon stay that way. The accolades heaped on the “genius” of Jeff Bezos are diverting attention from the most significant attempt yet to gain bargaining rights at Amazon, the worker struggle to unionize Amazon’s Bessemer fulfillment center in Alabama. Bezos and Amazon have been battling that effort with all guns blazing.
The Bessemer warehouse opened last March. By the end of November, over 2,000 workers at the center had signed union authorization cards. But Amazon has been working to postpone the mail election that would bring the Bessemer workforce union recognition — to give the company as much time as possible to poison the environment that surrounds the voting.
That poisoning has already begun, notes the Guardian’s Michael Sainato, “through texts, messaging, an anti-union website, and several anti-union captive audience meetings with workers at the warehouse.” The company’s “do-it-without-dues” message hasn’t been particularly subtle. By going union, Amazon is charging, workers will “be giving up your right to speak for yourself.” Warns the company: “Don’t let the union take your money for nothing.”
Amazon’s tactics in Alabama may prove decisive. Amazon may succeed at squashing the union vote. If that happens, we all lose — because management science tells us that real, sustainable enterprise innovation and success only come when enterprises share the rewards they generate. Outrageous rewards give executives an incentive to operate outrageously, to jeopardize, for instance, worker safety, as Amazon has repeatedly been doing.
No executives, the founder of modern management science Peter Drucker believed, ought to earn over 20 or 25 times what their workers are making. In the United States today, the world’s top happyland for corporate execs, we’re not quite meeting that standard. In 2018, 50 U.S. CEOs pocketedover 1,000 times their median worker’s take-home.
We won’t narrow the gap between America’s richest and everyone else until we slow down this reckless corporate inequality engine. And we can do that. We can legislate and regulate out of existence the strong-arming tactics that employers like Amazon use to stay “union-free.” We can deny government contracts to corporations that pay their execs outrageously more than they pay their workers. We can tax these same corporations at higher levels than firms that fairly share the wealth.
Goodbye, CEO Jeff Bezos. May we never see another CEO as insatiably voracious.
Sam Pizzigati, an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, has written widely on income and wealth concentration, with op-eds and articles in publications ranging from the New York Times to Le Monde Diplomatique. He co-edits Inequality.org Among his books: The Rich Don’t Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class, 1900-1970 (Seven Stories Press). His latest book: The Case for a Maximum Wage (Polity). A veteran labor movement journalist, Pizzigati spent 20 years directing publishing at America’s largest union, the 3.2 million-member National Education Association.
ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.
The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.
Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.
The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.
Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.
“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”
Yanis Varoufakis
“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”
Bill Fletcher Junior
“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”
Cynthia Peters
This is your article this month.
We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.
Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:
Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.
Sound is muted by default. Tap 🔊 for the full experience
CRITICAL ACTION
Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.
If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.
Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.
It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.
More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.
