It was 86 years ago this month — September of 1919 — that angry steelworkers launched one of the most fierce, most bloody and most important of the many battles that created the American labor movement.

Just 10 months earlier, the United States and its allies had emerged victorious from World War I. The steelworkers whose labor had contributed much to the war effort — and much to their employers’ huge profits — had set out to organize a union, so as to gain some control over their working lives and increase their miserly share of the profits their work brought employers.

Miserly is an understatement. Steelworkers, most of them eastern European immigrants, commonly worked 12 hours a day in what was the country’s largest and most profitable industry. Yet only a very few made more than what was then considered a poverty level wage. They had almost no fringe benefits, and no rights other than working under whatever conditions the steel companies imposed. They dared not complain, on pain of losing their jobs and being ousted from company-owned housing.

Organizers from the American Federation of Labor helped the workers win shorter workdays and other concessions from steel companies in the Midwest, upper New York state and West Virginia just after the war. But their major targets — and major opponents — were in the heart of the industry in Pittsburgh and the surrounding areas of western Pennsylvania.

Led by U.S. Steel, the country’s largest corporation of any kind, the companies refused to even talk with union representatives who were seeking collective bargaining rights — not even AFL President Samuel Gompers, not even after U.S. President Woodrow Wilson urged them to.

The companies did more than refuse negotiations. They fired just about anyone who showed any interest in unions, and put them on a blacklist that kept them from being hired by anyone else in the industry.

Not surprisingly, a strike finally erupted. By the end of that September of 1919, 350,000 steelworkers were off the job — 90 percent of the industry’s entire workforce. Never before had there been a strike of such magnitude in any U.S. industry.

Employer propagandists labeled the walkout “un-American,” playing on the fact that many of the strikers were immigrants. At the same time, they attempted to convince the immigrants that by striking they were rebelling against the government and so could hurt their chances for citizenship.

As it turned out, in some cases they were right.The Justice Department arrested and deported hundreds of strikers it labeled as dangerous Bolsheviks, the political bogeymen of the day. It marked the first stage of the “Red Scare” that eventually led to the arrest of more than 6,000 alleged Communists in 33 cities across the country in raids — the infamous Palmer Raids — led by U.S. Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer and his chief aide, J. Edgar Hoover.

From Pittsburgh to Clairton, 25 miles along the banks of the Monongahela River, jails were jammed with strikers and their supporters. Many were brought in by armed vigilantes and even strikebreakers, who had been deputized by the Allegheny County sheriff.

Eventually, there were more than 350,000 strikebreakers. Most were black workers who had no compunction about taking the jobs held by white workers whose unions denied them admission.

Municipal officials throughout the strike area forbade all union meetings. Strikers were likely to be arrested anywhere, at any time, for any reason, if only on charges of being “radicals” or “suspicious persons.” Strikers were clubbed, beaten, shot at. Hundreds were injured, some seriously. Twenty died.

Employers took advantage of the many ethnic divisions among them, hiring spies to infiltrate their ranks and stir up hostility. One company, for instance, instructed its agents to “spread data among the Serbians that the Italians are going back to work. Call up every question you can in reference to racial hatred between these two nationalities. Urge them to go back to work or the Italians will get their jobs.”

Racially divided, legally prohibited from meeting together in any case, told constantly by local newspapers that their strike was failing, and with few financial resources, the striking steelworkers nevertheless held out for 3 1/2 months.

They won nothing. Yet as former steelworkers union president George Becker noted, the strike was not a failure.

“It is never a failure,” he said, “when 350,000 workers take their destiny into their own hands.”

As Becker observed, “It was a step on the ladder that led to the founding of the United Steelworkers union and changed the course of history” by pointing the way for the unionization throughout all of American industry that finally came in the 1930s.

Copyright © 2005 Dick Meister, a freelance columnist in San Francisco who has covered labor issues for four decades as a newspaper and broadcast reporter, editor and commentator (dickmeistersf@earthlink.net, www.dickmeister.com).

Dick Meister is a San Francisco-based freelance writer who's done columns, articles and commentaries on labor, politics, international affairs, the media, sports, historical events, and foreign and domestic travel for more than 400 print, broadcast and online outlets over the past half-century. He's also co-authored a history of farm labor, "A Long Time Coming," published by Macmillan. He's been a reporter for United Press, The Associated Press, the San Jose Mercury News and PBS TV Station KQED in San Francisco, labor editor of the San Francisco Chronicle, city editor of the Oakland Tribune, and a commentator on Pacifica Radio in Berkeley, Los Angeles and Houston and on other public radio stations around the country. He holds BA and MA degrees in journalism from Stanford University and has taught the subject at San Francisco State University. Web address: www.dickmeister.com


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version