AS BIG DIG holes leak taxpayer dollars by the gallon, as Halliburton overbills the Pentagon by millions, as Enron CEOs go to jail for defrauding stockholders, and as HMOs provide less and less health care for higher and higher fees, it is time to reexamine that great myth spawned by the Reagan revolution: the myth of privatization.

For too long, Republicans have been able to promote, unchallenged, the notion that the private sector can deliver goods and even public services more efficiently, more cheaply, and better.

“Privatization” has meant a variety of things: from giving corporations taxpayer money with little government oversight, as in the Big Dig, to turning public schools into for-profit charters, to forcing community colleges like my own to rely less on state funding and more on private fund-raising, including raising student fees in order to survive. Whatever its form, privatization is based on the general concept that business is good, government is bad.

In the presidential debates, George W. Bush was proud to claim (falsely) that Senator John Kerry wanted to impose “another big government healthcare program, like in France or Canada.” Never mind that countries with national health plans like Canada, France, and England, wouldn’t dream of trading their free universal coverage, with all its imperfections, for our system, where millions lack any healthcare at all.

Never mind that Social Security is actually solvent and supporting millions of Americans. Since President Bush is now recommending that we privatize Social Security, we need to be clear on the realities. Although it faces challenges from the baby boomer generation, Social Security has always been self-sustaining and has actually been tapped as a source of revenue for other government programs.

Never mind that my own community college, even with slashed funding, manages to provide a quality education, raise money, and stay within budget. Never mind a recent federal study showing that in Texas, 98 percent of the public schools met state performance standards while only 66 percent of charter schools did. “Privatization” is ideology, not fact.

Consider the Big Dig as a poster child for what happens when “big government” steps aside. Years ago, when it was reported that Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff both executed and monitored the preliminary design of the Big Dig, my alarm bells rang. With little interest in reining in costs, the price of the Big Dig escalated by billions, creating the greatest overruns in the history of US public works. Now we hear that the project itself may be seriously flawed.

How did this occur? There may be blame enough to go around, but let us remember, a series of Republican governors — Weld, Cellucci, and Swift, all firm believers in privatization — allowed Bechtel to run its own show. When two members of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Jordan Levy and Christy Mihos, protested, Governor Swift moved to fire them.

In short, the Big Dig is a classic example of private corporations abusing public funds for private profit. This occurs all the time with military procurement. Yet now, when politicians choose to vote against overpriced military equipment or the faulty missile defense program, they are branded as antidefense or even unpatriotic.

We are now facing the largest deficit in our nation’s history, in part driven by tax cuts, in part by the open-ended war in Iraq. Large corporations like Bechtel are grabbing a “piece of the pie” in what will be a protracted, expensive task of reconstructing a country we are spending billions to bomb. Meanwhile, our president warns that Social Security is in trouble, and we need to “reform” it.

But in all these matters, who will pay and who will profit? Does privatization really deliver better goods and services at lower cost, or does it just transfer public wealth into private pockets? Are we gradually eliminating all public services, replacing them with a system of pay-as-you-go benefits that serve only the wealthy?

Although America is a capitalist country, we have accepted, since the New Deal and even before, government’s role in reining in corporate excess and taking care of the needy. Most Americans believe that Social Security, unemployment insurance, Medicare, and child labor laws are beneficial, although all were instituted against the opposition of big business. Now the Bush administration, closely allied with major oil, defense, and drug companies and with control of Congress, appears bent on privatizing the entire country. We can only wonder, what will happen to us then?

Susan Jhirad is chairwoman of the English Department at North Shore Community College.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version