Colombia’s peasant, indigenous, and union organizations called for a major mobilization on May 15, 2006. With elections on May 28, 2006, the organizations sought to demonstrate their opposition to the Colombian regime’s Free Trade Agreement with the United States, its civil war, its relationship with the paramilitaries, and its proposed constitutional changes. The election is very quickly coming down to a contest between the current President, Alvaro Uribe Velez, and the political left candidate Carlos Gaviria.

In a straight political contest, Carlos Gaviria’s candidacy would win. But Uribe’s campaign has been very dirty. Uribe recently said publicly that the election is between his program, which he calls ‘Democratic Security’, on the one hand, and ‘Communism in Disguise’ on the other. Calling the political opposition ‘Communism in Disguise’ is another way of calling them guerrillas, which, in a country where paramilitaries murder ‘suspected guerrillas’ and their families with impunity, amounts to a death threat. The paramilitaries themselves made have made similar statements in recent days.

In addition to the filthy campaigning, according to reports that are coming in, the Colombian regime reacted to the May 15 mobilizations with a demonstration that the political opposition will not be allowed to campaign or demonstrate for its position, and that opposition to the Colombian establishment will be punished.

It began with the government claiming that it had ‘proof’ that FARC was behind the mobilizations. The ‘proof’ was never produced.

Next, the indigenous mobilizations were met with helicopters, military forces, and riot police, who used heavy doses of tear gas to clear the area of La Maria Piendamo. The riot police sprayed gasoline into the health centre at Piendamo and burned it.

The indigenous, who on May 16 blocked the Pan American Highway at Piendamo, agreed to negotiate with the government. They opened one of the highway’s two lanes at 9am on May 17. The government told them their negotiators would arrive at Piendamo at 1pm. The indigenous assembled their leadership at the site. But instead of a government negotiating team, the government sent the riot police again. The police arrested two of the movement leaders who had come to negotiate – Jesus Lopez of CIMA, Southern Cauca’s peasant organization, and Carmen Leon from CRIC, the indigenous organization of the Cauca region.

Before the May 17 government attack on the negotiators, Carlos Gaviria, in his capacity as a presidential candidate, phoned Colombia’s Minister of the Interior and Justice, Sabas Pretelt. Gaviria demanded that Pretelt himself attend the negotiation. Pretelt told Gaviria directly that the government ministers would attend the negotiation once the highway was cleared. Pretelt also repeated the accusation that the FARC was behind the mobilization.

Pretelt, whose ministry is in charge of the riot police who shortly afterwards made a surprise attack to capture the opposition’s leaders, was lying on both counts.

Reports are still coming in. At the main site of the indigenous mobilization in Piendamo, the police have charged repeatedly, driving the people off the site and into the fields, with some gravely wounded.

At another site, in Remolinos in Narino, there are reports of police snipers firing at protestors from trees. Protestors believe the police are acting on orders to disperse the mobilization everywhere.

In Bogota, activists peacefully occupied the government’s human rights ombudsperson’s (Defensoria del Pueblo) office at 4pm on May 17. Their demand is for a humanitarian commission to verify the truth of events at Piendamo. They want international observers and journalists on the ground in Colombia, and people following the situation outside to pressure the regime, with letters and at consulates.

Colombia’s guerrillas have long made the argument that the only path to change that is left is war. They point to the history of paramilitarism, by the fact that every time people tried to force a political opening, the establishment shut it with terror and violence. Too often, they have allowed this belief to bring themselves into violent conflict with the people. This, as well as the establishment’s use of the guerrillas as a pretext to attack all opposition, has made change much more difficult to reach in Colombia. But many of the country’s many political and social movements have persisted in trying to force such openings.

In October 2003, when Uribe’s referendum was overturned and left candidates won many local races, there was reason to believe a chance for political change had opened. Colombia is part of the Americas and its peoples have the same will to struggle for democracy as those in Venezuela or Bolivia. Its establishment, however, has been among the most ruthless in suppressing it.

But Uribe has not won yet.

This is a preliminary article based on rush reports from Colombia, awaiting verification. For a background on the mobilizations see this interview with Manuel Rozental (audio):
http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/audio_library/wv_ramay06.asp#8. See also http://colombia.indymedia.org and http://www.nasaacin.net.

Justin Podur is a professor (of environmental science at York University in Toronto), a writer on international politics (books - Haiti's New Dictatorship and America's Wars on Democracy in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo), a fiction writer (Siegebreakers, the Path of the Unarmed) and a podcaster (The Anti-Empire Project, and The Brief).


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors718
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors718
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version