It should come as no surprise that the decision of the Federal Communications Commission to rewrite media ownership rules has stirred a firecry in Congress. Unlike the members of the FCC, members of the House and Senate must face the voters at election time. And, while Americans may disagree about many issues, they are united on one point: Communications conglomerates should not be allowed to extend their already excessive control of the public discourse at the local or national level.

 

The FCC knew this because more than 750,000 Americans told them so. According to dissident Commissioner Michael Copps, who opposed rewriting the rules to favor the interests of big media corporations, citizen input to the FCC ran 99.9 percent against the proposed rule changes. And this was after FCC Chairman Michael Powell explicitly asked Americans to email and write the FCC to tell him what they thought about relaxing the media ownership rules. Yet, FCC Powell and his two Republican allies went ahead and did the bidding of the media giants — after accepting dozens of junkets paid for by the key players in industries they are supposed to regulate.

 

Now, members of Congress are working on a number of fronts to reverse the damage done June 2 when the FCC voted to allow a single company to buy up television stations that reach up to 45 percent of American viewers, to own two (or, in some cases, even three) television stations in the same town, and to own both newspapers, radio and television stations in the same community.

 

Senators who opposed the ownership rule changes — ranging from progressives like Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold to moderates like Wisconsin Democrat Herb Kohl and Maine Republican Olympia Snowe and conservatives like Mississippi Republican Trent Lott — are talking about forcing a vote to overturn the new rules, restricting appropriations that the FCC needs to implement the rules or simply writing laws that would supercede the rules. And they are winning new allies daily. Even Arizona Republican John McCain, who is usually a champion of loosening restrictions on media ownership, says, “I have gone from (being) a deregulator to someone who is very concerned about the level of media concentration.”

 

The next big day in the fight for media reform will be June 19, when the McCain-chaired Senate Commerce Committee will decide whether to support a motion to rescind the FCC rule changes.

 

The Congressional interest — and potential intervention — is great news. But Americans should not be lulled into complacency by a sense that Congress will simply do the right thing when it comes to defending competition, diversity and local control of media. Only by keeping up the pressure on Congress will citizens force their representatives to block these rule changes and to begin the process of restoring the public-interest rules and regulations that will protect the public interest that the FCC chose to ignore.

 

To learn all about the fight to rescind the rule changes, and to get a comprehensive overview of the burgeoning media reform movement, go to http://www.mediareform.net

 

You will also learn about the National Conference on Media Reform in Madison in from November 7-9.

 

But don’t stop there. Take two minutes to make the difference between victory and defeat.

 

Go to the online petition http://www.mediareform.net/stopthefcc and tell your friends to do the same. Read on for more details…

 

———————————————————————-

 

This “viral” petition campaign will create a massive wave of petitions to Commerce committee members in both chambers.

 

The legislation (S.1046) would roll back the broadcast ownership cap limit, and a crucial amendment is planned that would reverse the rule allowing cross-ownership of newspapers and TV stations.

 

Here’s what to do:

 

1) Go to the petition campaign http://www.mediareform.net/stopthefcc 2) Personalize the message to your Congressional delegation 3) Enter email addresses of friends and colleagues in your state; 4) Send your message. It will be printed out and walked to your members of Congress, and this message will be forwarded to your contacts. Your friends will not receive spam as a result of this petition.

 

It’s that simple.

 

For more information on the FCC battle, media reform and how to get involved, go to http://www.mediareform.net

 

You should also go to the Common Cause website: www.commoncause.org. Common Cause has been a champion in this struggle.

 

Don’t have world wide web access? Forward this email to your friends and colleagues in your state.

 

June 19 is just the first step in this next part of the fight to take the power back from big media.  

 

 

Robert McChesney is an American professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign as the Gutgsell Endowed Professor in the Department of Communication. He specializes in the history and political economy of communication, and the role media play in democratic and capitalist societies. He co-founded Free Press, a national media reform organization.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors710
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors710
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version