Source: Waging Non-Violence

What most of America doesn’t understand is that there has not been an election where race and white supremacy has not been on the ballot. The issue of voting rights, who can and cannot vote, health care, crime, Supreme Court nominees, a women’s choice, guns or taxes all boil down to who keeps and who is able to take away.

From the inception of the nation — with a Constitution framed by slaveholders in which three-fifths of Black people were counted to protect the rights and political power of white elites — white supremacy has been embedded in the political discourse, whether overt or covert, and race is always on the ballot. Politicians have actively pursued the “Southern strategy” in national elections by playing upon race for the southern voter, which is morphed into criminal hordes for the northern voter. And, I would be remiss if I did not mention the fears of the surge of darker peoples on the southern border.

We have listened, historically, to slogans of a “war on drugs,” “tough on crime,” “affirmative action,” “reverse discrimination,” “welfare queens,” and “Willie Horton” as some of the sounds that ring, and have been used to racialize elections, at different times in American history. The issue is when will a majority of white people awaken to the fact that they have been used in the game of preserving white supremacy for the benefit of white elites. As Lyndon Johnson once reflected to a young staffer at that time, Bill Moyers: “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

Race has certainly been on every ballot in the country, and these midterm elections were not exempt.

There is a collective sigh of relief that a “red wave” did not fully manifest itself, and that Democratic control of the Senate will remain, while the Congress will likely fall under the control of the Republicans, but not by a wide margin. The media and political pundits predict the end of Trump and herald the rise of a Trump replacement on the right: Ron DeSantis, governor of Florida. There will be a run-off election in the state of Georgia between Rev. Raphael Warnock and Herschel Walker. And, some will argue that the system worked, even down to the racist history of run-off elections in Georgia and its precursor, the County Unit System.

The County Unit System that preceded run-off elections had the same racially odorous effect. After slavery and during Reconstruction one-man-one-vote was militarily enforced. This meant that in many places the Black vote outnumbered the white vote. So, as whites rolled back the reforms of Reconstruction and regained control of state legislatures, County Unit Systems and other methods were employed to ensure white victories in elections. After the U.S. Supreme Court rendered the County Unit System unconstitutional in 1963, Georgia legislators feared that the end of that system would jeopardize white political power.

Georgia State Rep. Denmark Groover, seeking to maintain white advantage in elections, drafted a bill to change the primary and general election systems from a plurality to a run-off system. The bill, passed in 1964, codified that if a candidate (targeting Black people and their allies) finished first or second but without 50 percent of the vote plus one, the race would be subjected to a run-off election, where the white vote could coalesce around the white candidate and guarantee the election of the white candidate. Though the current scenario in Georgia is between Black candidates, the use of skin color is an ideological distraction because what remains on the ballot is the white supremacy of old, represented by Herschel Walker, or the thrust of Reconstruction inclusiveness represented by Rev. Raphael Warnock.

Those who think this criticism is too harsh and pointed need only to look around at the closeness of many of the midterm races. The question must be asked, how come so many of the election deniers, emboldened racists (hiding behind freedom of speech), and MAGA-maniacs got so many votes, coming so close to victory, and in some races were victorious?

Race was on the ballot. The country has never confessed that the ideological issues that led to the Civil War, and re-emerged after the dismantling of Reconstruction have never been dealt with. Today, what has been on the ballot are still the issues of white supremacy and whether the politics of inclusion and compassion can be defeated once and for all. We seem to have almost dodged a bullet this time. There are some flesh wounds, and yet we will have to fight for civil rights and inclusion again on another day, and in another election.


This article was originally published by Waging Non-Violence; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version