In a reportedly historic turnout, 3,162,400 Venezuelans voted in the internal parliamentary primaries of the governing Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) that took place yesterday.

From the early hours of the morning until 10:00 at night, Venezuelans waited in line for hours for their chance to cast a ballot in all 87 circuits of the country’s 23 states.

With turnout reportedly surpassing all other primaries in the history of the PSUV, the National Electoral Council (CNE) was compelled to extend the deadline for poll closing, initially scheduled for 6:00pm,  in order to accommodate those still waiting in lines.

National Assembly President and PSUV Vice-President, Diosdado Cabello, underlined the magnitude of popular participation and publically apologized, “because the number of voting centers and tables was insufficient.”

“Everywhere the common denominator has been the participation of our people,” he affirmed following the close of polls late Sunday night.

“This is an extraordinary figure, here there has never occurred anything like this,” he added.

Sunday’s primaries culminate a month of campaigning by over 1,162 pre-candidates chosen by 13,600 grassroots assemblies throughout the country in April. In accordance with new rules set down by the PSUV, 50% of the candidates were under 30 years of age and 60% of candidates were were women.

Despite the quotas adopted by the PSUV for pre-candidate selection, however, on Sunday just 30% of the candidates chosen by the party’s rank and file were women.

Nonetheless, the results contrasted starkly with last month’s opposition primaries, which were marred by empty voting stations and elite backroom dealmaking.

With primaries held in only 33 circuits in eleven states, the 543,723 votes accrued by the Roundtable of Democratic Unity (MUD) was reportedly surpassed by the PSUV as early as nine in the morning. In those same 33 circuits, the PSUV managed to double turnout with 1,300,000 voters crowding the polls.

Unlike the PSUV, which allowed voters to choose 100% of parliamentary candidates, the MUD leadership handpicked 75% of its 168 candidates, disillusioning many opposition militants hoping for a more inclusive, democratic process.

Similarly, the MUD selection process came under fie for eliticism in both gender and class terms, with women comprising only 10 of 110 primary candidates and prospective candidates obligated to pay the equivalent of five minimum wages in order to register.

On June 25th, the CNE approved a resolution establishing that 50% of candidates for the National Assembly elections from both the PSUV and the MUD must be women. The announcement has left a question mark hanging over whether or not another set of primaries will have to be organised by the MUD, which hit out at the resolution as “unconstitutional”. So far, it appears that both the opposition and the ruling party have failed to meet the quota.

The candidates chosen by the bases of the PSUV yesterday will compete for 168 National Assembly seats in the general election on December 6, which will be monitored by a delegation from the Union of South American States (UNASUR).

While international commentators have predicted that upcoming elections will see a decisive rout for the PSUV, a recent study by the private polling firm Hinterlaces has found that approximately 62% of Venezuelans prefer the socialist party to continue governing.

Despite consistent refusal to recognize its legitimacy on the part of the opposition, the United States, and the corporate media, Venezuela’s electoral system has been internationally acclaimed for its fairness and fail-safe precision, celebrated by Jimmy Carter has the “best in the world”.

Voters’ Privacy Guaranteed

Following the primary election results, rightwing newspaper La Patilla caused controversy by reporting that President Nicolas Maduro allegedly possesses a list of “who voted and who didn’t” in the parliamentary primaries this past Sunday, implying that the socialist government is violating the privacy rights of its citizens.

The news story failed, however, to clarify that Sunday’s primary is an internal election, such that the PSUV has access to its own electoral roll, detailing who voted and who abstained.

The newspaper took the comments from a televised speech in which Maduro stated that the voter list would be used to encourage non-voters to participate in the upcoming election this December.

“We are beginning the work for December 6, and we are going to have the lists for the candidates to call on people to vote and organize for victory.”

In response to La Patilla and other rightwing news media who inferred malicious intent from the President’s remarks, the principal rector of the CNE, Socorro Hernandez, indicated that while the PSUV does have access to a list detailing who voted and who did not, for whom they voted remains a secret.

“Neither the CNE nor anybody can know who voted for whom, because the software makes it impossible.”

Socorro went on to note that the PSUV is, nevertheless, within its rights to request the list of who voted and who abstained, adding that the MUD made an identical request in the context of its primary last month.

“The MUD [in its primaries], requested the electoral roll of who voted in that election. For whom they voted is another question. Just like the PSUV. But in no case has any organization asked for the latter information”.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors716
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors716
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version