The main plaza of the Bolivian city of Cochabamba looked like a war zone on January 8th, as protestors demanding the resignation of Cochabamba’s governor, Manfred Reyes Villa, tried to take over the government offices and were faced with violent police repression. Loud gun shots could be heard all over the city center, which fired off toxic gases that burn one’s eyes and throat and send crowds of people running. To counteract these harmful gases the protestors, who consisted predominately of coca farmers from the Chapare region of Cochabamba, started small fires all over the plaza to mitigate the gases. Several cars belonging to government officials had been destroyed and sat abandoned in the plaza, burning. The locked door to the governor’s office was also set on fire, as Bolivian citizens who dared to get close to the police force hit the door with large sticks, attempting to break it down.

In a meeting at my workplace just two blocks away from the main plaza, we began smelling gases by 10:30 AM. Around noon gunshots could be heard every few minutes, and I went with several co-workers to support the various Bolivian social movements’”agricultural unions, women’s cooperatives, urban neighbourhood organizations, coca farmers’”demanding the governor’s resignation.

As we approached, a woman hanging on the shoulder of a man began vomiting. A crowd of people surrounded her, while other people started shouting, ‘Do not get near her, give her room to breathe!’Crowds of people dispersed from the plaza. Other groups of people shouted for everyone to stay, to surround the government offices again, that the people’s power was in numbers. We continued walking towards the center of the plaza. Dumpsters were knocked over, piles of garbage were on fire, two cars were burning, and the door to the government office was completely burned and in flames. Not a single police officer was on the plaza any longer because they all had taken cover inside the government headquarters. Every few minutes a window would open and tear gas canisters would be fired into the plaza. If we were lucky a valiant person would rush to the canister, pick it up, and throw it back at the police.

As more people slowly poured into the plaza again, having recovered form the last teargas attack, chanting began: ‘¡El pueblo, unido, jamas sera vencido!'(The people, united, will never be defeated!) Soon people were around me on all sides and it seemed that we were once again a united force, demanding together the resignation of a corrupt governor who was impeding the progressive change in Bolivia that the grassroots wanted.

Suddenly, the windows opened again and I heard several gunshots at once. I did not immediately realize the seriousness of the situation, but the people around me ran, and I followed.

I looked around and saw my co-workers a block ahead of me, walking back towards the plaza. I ran to catch up with them. Now we were some of the only people in the area. Worried about facing the teargas again, since my eyes were still burning, I asked if the police were going to shoot more gas at us. No, I was told, not yet, there were not enough people. The police would wait until people found the confidence to come back, then they would shoot the teargas again, in full force. For the Bolivian police, I was told, this was all a game.

At the end of the day the conflict had resulted in 33 injured, destroyed vehicles, and an entire part of the center plaza burned down. President Evo Morales’ government immediately responded by firing Cochabamba’s police chief, Wilge Obleas, for his decision to use tear gas on a crowd of civilians. Obleas continues to deny that he issued these orders.

The context of this demonstration is that last Thursday members of social movements from all over Cochabamba came together to march for the resignation of Cochabamba’s governor, Manfred Reyes Villa. Tens of thousands of Bolivians that make up neighbourhood organizations, labor unions and agrarian movements came to the capital to denounce Manfred and call for his resignation. The march ended with a large rally in main plaza and the symbolic ‘burning’of a representation of Manfred. For the next two days there were vigils held in the plaza, to continue the pressure on Manfred to resign. These vigils, however, was completely peaceful, with hundreds of people lying around in the plaza, sleeping, eating, laughing and sharing large piles of coca leafs together. After a days pause in the vigil on Sunday, the social movements came together once again on Monday, to continue to call for Manfred’s resignation. Although the exact order of the events are unclear, news reports say that the actual conflict started when the protestors tried to enter the governor’s office, and were immediately met with police violence. From this point the situation got out of control and violence escalated.

That is the short version of the story. The longer version of the story is that about a month ago Manfred Reyes Villa took a stand on two national issues that are currently highly charged. In December, Reyes Villa announced his support of Evo Morales opposition leaders, who believe that all new articles passed in the Bolivian Constitutional Assembly should by voted by two-thirds of the assembly’s delegates. The Constitutional Assembly is the legislative body currently charged with rewriting the Bolivian constitution. Members of Evo Morales’ party, the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS), make up slightly more than fifty percent of the assembly, and believe that requiring two-thirds majority to pass new articles will impede the real change that the Bolivian people want to see.

In December, Reyes Villa also called for a second referendum vote in Cochabamba on the issue of state autonomy in Bolivia. Although this referendum had been voted down in a national vote in July, Reyes Villa called for a second vote in hopes that the state of Cochabamba would vote in favour of a regional autonomy, which would give states more freedom from Evo Morales’ government.

These issues go beyond Manfred Reyes and the recent protests for his resignation. Bolivia is a politically conscious country right now, on the brink of real change, and these two issues’”regional autonomy and two-thirds majority’”are at the center of the debate. The right is as aware of what they might lose as the left is of what they might gain. The right calls two-thirds majority in the Constitutional Assembly democracy, even as they employ violent police repression on Bolivian citizens who democratically protest. The left marches against two-thirds majoritu and denounce the entire Constitutional Assembly as a body that will never make radical change in Bolivia. Meanwhile, the MASistas (strong Evo Morales supporters) are willing to put their lives on the line for Evo and refuse to hear any critiques about him on the left or the right.

For these reasons, it is not surprising that the events in the main plaza of Cochabamba accelerated so rapidly. Even as I write this article the Bolivian Left is blocking roads all over the city to continue to pressure Manferd to resign, while the Right has announced a march in favour of Manfred and two-thirds majority, which will take place tomorrow. We are at a critical point in Bolivia’s history, and everyone feels that everything is at stake.

Rebecca Tarlau is currently working for the Bolivian NGO Center of Documentation and Information (CEDIB), her blog is www.becktar.blogspot.com.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors713
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors713
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version