Source: Other Words

Though corporate America would like us to believe otherwise, the retail prices of essential goods like food and energy are not set by simple supply and demand.

In large part, they’re determined by the corporate cartels that have vanquished their competitors — and Wall Street speculators who place bets on the future availability of commodities.

With price hikes for energy, gas, and food remaining stubbornly high, it’s time to do something about it. That’s why some experts now support a fix that was long considered taboo: limiting what corporations can charge for certain goods.

In other words, price controls.

Price controls tend to outrage many economists and business-friendly politicians. But curbing excess profits and making essentials more affordable would be politically smart — and effective.

The public is clearly worried about high gasoline prices, and polls show that a majority think corporations are fleecing them. There’s a good reason for that: While the pandemic certainly created logistical and supply chain headaches, it’s equally true that corporate profits are soaring amid all the suffering.

That’s no coincidence. Corporations that have near monopoly power in their sector understand that the pandemic has given them the perfect cover to profiteer.

In some sectors of the food industry — where just four companies control about 85 percent of the beef market and three companies dominate the chicken business — CEOs are telling shareholders that they raised prices above their additional costs simply because they could. Let’s take them at their word.

Setting reasonable maximum prices for essentials like food, gasoline, and energy would reduce out of pocket costs to consumers — and therefore curb excessive profiteering by corporate giants.

We could start in the mega-consolidated food industries, where the meat and dairy giants exert considerable control over pricing. (Indeed, the companies that control the meat industries regularly face price-fixing accusations.)

Gasoline prices – always a hot-button political issue — are another area where setting maximum prices would deter fossil fuel industry profiteering.

There’s historical precedent for such actions. Price controls were a key concern of the Roosevelt administration’s Office of Price Administration during World War Two. Controls remained available in the decades that followed, either as a wartime measure or to properly align wages and worker productivity.

Even President Nixon instituted short-term controls on prices and wages in response to an inflation spike. It wasn’t until the Reagan administration that lobbying by corporate interests eventually succeeded in eliminating these constraints on their power.

We’ve all been taught that prices are determined by supply and demand. But that really only applies in theoretical, competitive marketplaces. Rampant corporate concentration upends those assumptions in many parts of the economy, granting the dominant players the ability to keep prices high — to the delight of Wall Street investors.

In short, we already have price controls — they’re just being set by corporate powers to keep prices higher.

The federal government has a range of powers it could use to protect consumers, public safety, and the climate. Unfortunately, the Biden administration is opting instead for short-term moves of dubious benefit — like releasing oil from the strategic reserves and waiving pollution rules to encourage more ethanol-blended fuels to hit the market before the summer.

The White House can and must do more.

In the short term, showing the political courage to confront corporate power and deliver tangible relief to families being squeezed by corporate greed will resonate with voters.

Over the long term, the answer is to pass legislation that breaks up corporate consolidation, like a bill recently introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Mondaire Jones of New York that would block corporate mega-mergers that harm workers and consumers.

These are the kinds of steps we need to take to create an economy that works better for everyone.

Wenonah Hauter is the executive director of the national advocacy group Food & Water Watch.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors684
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors684
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version