Poverty does not create black people. Poverty creates crime. In order to eliminate crime, you have to eliminate poverty. But we would rather bulldoze poverty with gentrification or let poor people kill each other with no interference. If you track rates of violence in distressed communities by race, the Ohio State University Research News reports that violent crimes are 22 per thousand for blacks and 20 per thousand for whites. That suggests that although African Americans are disproportionately poor and disadvantaged, we do not disproportionately kill.

It is poverty that kills. But Mayor Bloomberg, defending his stop-and-frisk policy that was shot down by federal Judge Shira Scheindlin as racist and unconstitutional, would have us believe it is blacks and Latinos who are the murderers. While claiming to be protecting black and brown people, Bloomberg drags them out as the bogeyman in the stop-and-frisk controversy to scare whites. His words sully minorities, but the numbers don’t lie.

New York stop-and-frisk statistics show that weapons are found on whites 1.9 percent of the time; blacks 1.1, and Hispanics, 1.3. For contraband the numbers are 2.3 percent for whites, 1.8 percent for blacks, and 1.7 percent for Hispanics. Almost 90% of stops yield nothing.

http://www.nationalreview.com/agenda/355671/thinking-through-stop-and-frisk-reihan-salam

Mayor Bloomberg claims to be getting the guns out of the hands of dangerous minorities but … not so much. The discriminatory stop-and-frisk tactic yielded people more likely to be carrying a bag of weed than a Smith and Wesson. Marijuana arrests as a result of this policy outnumbered all other arrests, including trespassing and weapon possession.

According to the New York Times, the NYPD spent 1 million hours arresting 440,000 people for low-level drug crimes between 2002 and 2012. Of course, 85% of arrests were blacks and Hispanics. A 2011 memo from NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly directed his police officers to stop arresting people for the happy dust, presumably because it was such a waste of resources and taxpayer’s money.

Using stop and frisk to get murderers off the streets is like pissing on the Great Chicago Fire. If Bloomberg is really looking for guns, I suggest that he check white people. Ever since a black man was elected president, whites are buying so many guns that the police are having trouble getting ammunition. In 2008, weapon sales soared, and then again in 2012.

Undaunted by prickly statistics and political leaders like Governor Andrew Cuomo who is advocating for decriminalization of the few joints that police officers are confiscating using what Judge Scheindlin has deemed “racial profiling,” Bloomberg and Kelly came out with a big media splash. They announced “the largest gun bust in the city’s history” as a result of an undercover operation. Apparently, this splash is meant to douse the fires that the federal judge has lit under his policy of rousting innocent people while trampling the Fourth search-and-seizure and Fourteenth equal-protection Amendments.

Keeping New Yorkers safe from murderers is the right thing to do. Locking up marijuana “tweekers” in unlawful stops won’t do it. As a matter of fact, the trend is toward getting these nonviolent, low-level lawbreakers out of a very dysfunctional, overcrowded and costly criminal justice system. Political leaders are counting dollars and making sense in a depressed economy. This month the New York City Comptroller’s Office released a report that taxing and regulating marijuana would yield $431 million dollars in savings and revenue

Paul Armentano of Norml, deputy director of an organization to reform marijuana laws, writes that authors of the report estimate:

… $31 million dollars would be saved annually in eliminating citywide misdemeanor marijuana possession arrests [NY State Penal Law 221.10 — possession of any amount of cannabis in public view], which in recent years have totaled approximately 50,000 arrests per year — largely as a result of law enforcement’s aggressive use of ‘stop-and-frisk’ tactics.

Further, the report states that although blacks make up 86% of the arrests, they are only 45% of marijuana users. Marijuana users and draconian drug laws are clogging up the system so much that 30 states had marijuana law reforms pending in 2012.

http://blog.norml.org/2013/08/15/new-york-city-comprollers-office-legalizing-marijuana-in-nyc-would-yield-431-million-annually-in-savings-and-revenue/

Inefficient use of police resources is not the only economic collateral damage from this Bloomberg boondoggle. A 2009 report from the New York City Comptroller’s Office published in the The New York Times said:

Nearly every year since Michael R. Bloomberg became mayor, more people have filed claims against the city for police actions. Deserved or not, the claims wind up costing the public a ton of money: In the last five years, the payouts have climbed to $117.6 million annually from $68.5 million. The number of claims increased to 6,616 from 5,420.

That‘s a lot of money spent to defend lawsuits. It’s created a cottage industry for lawyers like Evans Prieston, who has found a niche for himself as a New York False Arrest Attorney.

There are other unintended consequences of stop-and-frisk. Police lose whatever credibility they might have by showing up and slamming people against the wall with little pretense of probable cause. Many people just throw up their hands automatically when they see the police coming. Probable cause might as well be a new dance, as far as beleaguered and harassed minorities are concerned.

With 4 million New Yorkers stopped from 2004 to 2012, 85% of whom were African American, Latino, and mostly innocent, Deborah Grisom of the Washington Informer had this to say:

Racial profiling disproportionately targets people of color for investigation and enforcement, alienating communities from law enforcement, hindering community policing efforts, and causing law enforcement to lose credibility and trust among the people they are sworn to protect and serve.

Because billionaire Bloomberg doesn’t want to deal with poverty, or fix a criminal justice system that is broken, or answer to a federal judge who wants to monitor his racist tactics, he wants to wax John Wayne and convince New Yorkers that only stop-and-frisk can make these black and brown criminals hang up their guns.

“If this decision were to stand, it would make the city, in fact the whole country, a more dangerous place,” says Bloomberg.

Mayor, you are so ‘80s. That was the drug war, tough-on-crime, criminalization-of-the-black male era. But selling a discriminatory policy to the public using fear of “the other” is standard fare in American political drama. http://www.davekopel.com/CJ/The-Drug-War-on-Human-Rights.htm

Bloomberg, just say no.

Auset Marian Lewis is a writer living in Baltimore.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version