Number of likely Virginia voters polled on the eve of the Nov. 7 election by Latino Decisions, a Seattle-based political opinion research firm, with an over-sampling of non-whites to ensure their views were properly reflected: 1,600

Percent of all poll respondents who said they planned to vote in the governor’s race for Democrat Ralph Northam, currently the lieutenant governor, over Ed Gillespie, former chair of the Republican National Committee: 54

Margin by which Northam defeated Gillespie, who ran a racially charged campaign that focused on restricting immigration and defending Confederate statues: 54-45

Percent of Asian-American, Latino and African-American poll respondents, respectively, who preferred Northam: 69, 73, 89

Percent of white respondents who preferred Gillespie: 57

Month in which Gillespie’s campaign began running the first negative ad in the general election, making a connection between violence committed by the MS-13 street gang to Northam’s tie-breaking vote in the Virginia Senate against a ban on sanctuary cities: 8/2017

Percent of poll respondents overall who said the MS-13 ad made them less enthusiastic about Gillespie: 69

Percent of Asian-American, Latino and African-American respondents, respectively, who said so: 58, 67, 83

Percent of white respondents who agreed: 52

In response to what it called Gillespie’s “fear-mongering,” date on which the Latino Victory Fund — an outside political group unaffiliated with either campaign and a co-sponsor of the Latino Decisions poll — began running an ad in Virginia featuring a child dreaming that a Gillespie supporter in a Confederate flag-adorned pickup truck was terrorizing brown-skinned children: 10/30/2017

Number of days later that the group pulled the ad following a deadly terrorist truck attack in New York City: 1

Percent of all poll respondents who said they’d seen ads or heard discussion about Gillespie’s anti-immigrant views: 47

About racism in his campaign: 61

Of all respondents who had neither seen an ad nor heard discussion about racism in the governor’s contest, percent who favored Gillespie: 58

Percent of white respondents similarly situated who did so: 69

Of all respondents who had seen an ad or heard discussion about Gillespie and racism, percent who favored Northam: 66

Percent of white respondents similarly situated who did so: 57

Percent of all poll respondents who said Northam’s support for in-state tuition for immigrants brought to the U.S. as children made them more enthusiastic about his campaign: 58

Percent of white respondents who said it made them more enthusiastic for Northam as well: 51

(Click on figure to go to source. Most of the numbers in this index are from Latino Decision’s Elections Eve Poll, which was co-sponsored by AAPI Victory Fund, the African American Research Collaborative, America’s Voice, CASA in Action, Latino Victory Fund and NextGen America.)

Editorial director of the NC-based Institute for Southern Studies, publisher of Facing South and Southern Exposure, where she focuses on energy & the environment.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version