Source: DiEM 25

For nearly a year, DiEM25 has been calling on the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) to bar Israel from Eurovision due to its ongoing genocide in Gaza and its long-standing system of apartheid and occupation. We argued then, and continue to argue now, that cultural platforms must not be used to whitewash state violence or shield governments from accountability.

Now, that call is finally being echoed across Europe.

Over the past week, the Eurovision Song Contest has been plunged into crisis as a wave of broadcasters, artists, and former winners have publicly withdrawn rather than share a stage with a state carrying out genocide.

Far from isolated acts, these boycotts form a rapidly growing front built on moral clarity and international solidarity – the exact principles DiEM25 has urged the EBU to uphold.

A wave of boycotts

Five countries have now confirmed they will not participate in Eurovision 2026 if Israel remains in the contest: Iceland, Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Slovenia.

Iceland’s public broadcaster RÚV made the position explicit: Eurovision “cannot bring joy or peace” while turning a blind eye to mass civilian suffering. Others have echoed the same message: it is impossible to celebrate unity and culture while one contestant state is accused of war crimes on a catastrophic scale.

Meanwhile, inside national competitions, resistance is intensifying. In Portugal, no fewer than 17 artists competing in Festival da Canção announced that they will refuse to represent Portugal at Eurovision 2026 should they win that competition, rejecting any complicity in “a blatant double standard” that bans Russia but welcomes Israel.

Artists are refusing to be used for art-washing

The backlash is not limited to broadcasters. Switzerland’s 2024 Eurovision winner, Nemo, is returning their trophy in protest, stating that Eurovision cannot defend “European values” if it simultaneously offers a stage for a state under investigation for genocide. This is not a protest against Israeli artists – but against the use of culture to obscure crimes committed by the state.

This is precisely the argument DiEM25 made when we launched our campaign, “No Platform for Apartheid: Exclude Israel from Eurovision.” Eurovision cannot pretend to be non-political when its own decisions legitimise oppression.

A moment of cultural courage, and a final push

What we are witnessing now is a cultural uprising against complicity. Broadcasters, artists, and audiences have chosen integrity over spectacle, and Europe is finally catching up to what many human rights groups, including DiEM25, have insisted all along.

But the pressure must continue.

If the EBU insists on defying its own values and enabling art-washing, then the only ethical position left is a full, Europe-wide boycott of Eurovision 2026. The message must be clear that our continent is against cultural whitewashing. No Eurovision for apartheid.

Let’s boycott Eurovision 2026 unless Israel is removed.


This article was originally published by DiEM 25; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors709
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors709
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version