Were you among the Facebook friends or Twitter followers of the 20 million people who shared a picture of @thedress? I was. And, I was convinced that the dress was white and gold, rather than blue and black (which was what my mother saw). Or, admittedly, white with shades of light blue shimmering tints, and a kind of golden brown. My mother could only see blue and black.

A BBC news segment included a visit to the manufacturer which revealed that my mother was correct in what she saw. In the absence of bad lighting – it was clear that @thedress was, in fact, blue and black.

I have always enjoyed understanding optical illusions. As more than 20 million people shared an image of @thedress through social media networking sites, I learned much about the way in which we each see colors, was reminded of long forgotten high school biology lessons, and paused to ponder on how our perceptions of the world vary.

As Facebook friends shared an image of @thedress, I noticed some mutual friends comment with exasperation with sentiments such as; “people are dying in the world, and you’re concerned about the color of a dress! C’mon people!!!”.

I am always confused by such sentiments. How does boycotting sharing an image of an optical illusion further the quest for world peace? Does the pursuit of justice require abstinence from trivial interests? I understand indifference as to the color of @thedress better than I understand this exasperation.

If 20 million people shared daily visions for organising a free and participatory society – where resources were allocated and produced differently so as to eliminate poverty and classism, where we worked jobs that were more or less equally empowering, and where we moved toward sustainability – we might not worry about who or how many were sharing a picture of a dress and questioning its color. We might have large and diverse movements to end conflict, poverty, classism, racism, sexism, homophobia, able-ism, environment degradation, but, we don’t.

And, @thedress is not at fault – it’s a harmless optical illusion – more powerful illusions are at play. The illusion that hard work leads to financial freedom; the illusion that we can positively think our way to financial abundance or political freedom; the illusion that change is impossible and there is no alternative. Perhaps we must also reflect upon our own methods of communicating, building, and sharing visions for a more just society.

U.S. media website BuzzFeed helped make the image of @thedress go viral. BuzzFeed was set up to test, track and create viral content on the internet and typically publishes content that beings with numbers “23 Things All Introverts Are Guilty Of Doing” or “10 Children’s Games That Make No Sense When You Think About It”. It would be unusual to find meaningful political analysis on BuzzFeed.

Surely it’s more important to: understand the systems that propagate and support such media projects; support alternative projects (such as teleSUR and ZNet) which aim to shed light on imperialism, capitalism and poverty; build and participate in diverse social movements; and express in our loud and diverse voices our poetic visions for a more just society, than criticize another’s interest in a modern popular optical illusion.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors683
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors683
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version