Spain has made an unexpected turn in its history. Days before the last elections, various surveys announced that the executive power was not going to change and that Mariano Rajoy, right wing candidate promoted by the president of the Spanish government, José María Aznar, was going to be victorious.


It was clear that a third consecutive period for the rightist Partido Popular (Popular Party) was on its way. But then, Aznar and Rajoy recognized the bitter taste of defeat in front of the cameras around the world on Sunday March 14th in the late hours of the night.


José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, leader of the Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE), (Spanish Socialist Worker Party) turned into the new hero of a highly concurred electoral process. He now takes power to promote, according to his statements, a program that will change Spain: Zapatero will, like some say, touch solid ground.


One of the changes Zapatero will make is to withdraw the Spanish troops from Iraq (1,300 soldiers approximately). No doubt about it, Zapatero has answered to the different popular protests that repudiated the war against Iraq, in which Aznar involved Spain. The new leadership will break up with the United States-Spain-England Alliance.


The Spanish electoral process received a hard strike. The campaign finished steeply with the March 11 terrorist attacks, which killed 191 people and injured more than 1,900. That horrendous act that stupefied the world was used politically by Aznar, and his government blamed ETA with no proof. At all.


The Spanish government believed that in doing so the population was going to be distracted by the big mess created when their country became part of the coalition in Iraq. They believed people would just ignore the enormous repercussions for backing the US: Al Qaida and the fundamentalist islamic networks are now aiming at countries that help the United States.


But in the end, the Spanish people decided to punish the PP, whose principal leaders wanted to take electoral advantage by way of deceit. On the other hand, when the electorate realized that the responsability pointed to radical islamists, they could not do less than to blame Aznar for what he had gotten them into.


The Spain and El Salvador connection.


What are the consequences of the left winning in Spain here in El Salvador, where the right radical government of Francisco Flores has lost a ‘friend’ (Aznar), to whom he was as loyal as he was to George W. Bush? We will have to see. We do not have, as in Spain, the experience of interchanging governments and we do not posses a critical and analytical population, nor do we have a media capable of making things clear to the public even if it means hurting the government image.


In Spain, on the other hand, the return of the troops from Iraq will be a result of the popular demonstrations. Something that did not happen in El Salvador, and now is less likely to occur with the right in power for 5 more years.


Washington intruding in the Salvadorean affairs, trying to always benefit the right wing party, has not been a matter of popular protests either. Even the responses from Farabundo Martí Front for National Liberation (FMLN, the biggest opposition party) have been warm.


* Juan Jose Dalton is the correspondent for Dutch Press Agency (DPA) in El Salvador, He is a frequent writer to Latin American publications, both printed and electronical.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors688
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors688
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version